×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Current 2 phase flow method

Current 2 phase flow method

Current 2 phase flow method

(OP)
What is the currently accepted (by API, ASME, OSHA, courts of law) good engineering practice method of calculating relief devices with two phase flow?  

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

Three articles that you should get:

1. Ron Darby, "Size Safety-Releif Valves for Any Conditions", Chemical Engineering Magazine, September 2005

2. Ron Darby, F.E. Self, V.H. Edwards, "Properly Size Pressure-Relief Valves for Two-Phase Flow", Chemical Engineering Magazine, June 2002

3. J.C. Leung, "Easily Size Relief Devices and Piping for Two-Phase Flow", Chemical Engineering Progress, December 1996

The method given by Darby et. al. has been adapted from work done by DIERS. The method by Leung (the OMEGA method) is another way to obtain the same thing. Darby discusses this method as well as some others in the articles I reference. Currently, the Omega method is what is given in API RP520. Darby solves the nozzle equation for mass flow rate via direct numerical integration. These methods are accepted as good engineering practice by most standardards.

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

Homogeneous Equilibrium Model

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

API 520 refers to the Leung omega methode for "hand" calculations and the HEM methode for a more rigorous combuterbased methode.

Best regards

Morten

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

Leung's method IS based on the HEM model. All Leung has done was simplify the calcualtions by creating a pseudo-linear equation of state that can easily be integrated for both choked and non-choked flow.

The HEM model assumes equal velocities between the vapor and the liquid (no slip) and thermal equilibrium between the two phases, i.e. they are at the same temperature. The HEM model is found to be conservative in that it slightly underpredicts the mass flux (lb/hr/in2) through the valve and is the current preferred model to use. Read reference #3 I give in my post above.

Other models introduce a slip ratio into the equation for volume fraction of the gas phase and some introduce a non-equilibrium "quality value" into the two-phase density calculation. The final calculation method to determine mass flux through the relief valve is performed the same way with just these modifications added. Read references #1 and 2 I give in my post above.

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

Currently, the new method is Diers Omega Method.

The old school method is to solve for the liquid and gas separately, add them togehter, and add a bit of safety factor.

In most of my applications, the tricky part isn't the calculations, it's the $ of gas/liq.

"Do not worry about your problems with mathematics, I assure you mine are far greater."   
Albert Einstein
Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

Ooops, meant % of gas/liq.

"Do not worry about your problems with mathematics, I assure you mine are far greater."   
Albert Einstein
Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

The Leung method IS the Omega method as I state in my first post. Leung basically proposes a single point (pressure vs volume) to determine Omega. API RP520 uses a two point basis to calculate Omega, one at the stagnation conditions and one at 0.9 stagnation.

However, I hear that the next revision of API 520 (whenever that will be) will be emphasizing the use of the Direct Integration Method to determine the mass flux through the relief valve. This is also the method most preferred by the DIERS Users Group. The Omega method will still be very useful for single component systems away from the critical point and for use in pipe sizing/pressure drop determination.

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

(OP)
Have any of you had experience with "The AIChE / ASME / DUG course “Emergency Relief System Design Using DIERS Technology”", and if so is it worth the money?  I have an opportunity to go, but don't want to waste my employer's money.  What do you think?

RE: Current 2 phase flow method

I took it and thought it was great. However, for it to be meaningful in anyway, you should be involved with doing PSV analysis and sizing at your site AND at least some of your relieving scenarios will be two-phase.

The course emphasizes the latest information on the DIERS methodology for sizng relief systems for two-phase flow, this includes the PSV itself, piping and downstream equipment.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources