×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Branch Piping Turbulence

Branch Piping Turbulence

Branch Piping Turbulence

(OP)
Need some opinions on the following flow situation, which I believe will cost many dollars and not provide significant results.

Have a request to determine flow disturbance created by modifying an existing piping system.

Turbulent flow (water at std conditions) in 8' diameter pipe.
Install 24" diameter branch with blind flange for access.
Fabricate a 24" flange connection with an internal plug to fill the short branch volume.  The plug face will match the existing 8' diameter wall contour. Claim is to mitigate additional turbulence. Line pressure is 40 psi, Reynolds number in the 1*10^7 range(upper end of transition phase).
Cannot believe that the disturbance (turbulence) is significant when the plug will conform to the large pipe ID.

Connection will be several diameters downstream of a normally full open check valve, so the flow regime profile will not be fully developed.

Yes there will be a small gap at the interface, but certainly no redirection of the flow.

My comments to date - FEA and /or CFD would be the only way to go, and the results would be insignificant. Losses are minimal for a normal "tee" connection without a plug or branch flow.

Believe that determining the flow conditions at the plug insert would require a total analysis of the pipe upstream and downstream, supports, check valve, vibration etc. in order to get meaningful relative data. Cost could be significant.

Tis a puzzle that I have not had to address during 30 years of piping, except head box piping (cotton test) in Paper Mills.

RE: Branch Piping Turbulence

Why ?

These sort of solutions I have had to adopt in high velocity reservoir outlets to avoid cavitation damage but to adopt such a solution to reduce, what is likely to be a negligible head loss, as you say will spend dollars with no result.

Is there any other reason such as a downstream flow meter installation?

RE: Branch Piping Turbulence

bose,

I agree with BRIS...... Why ?

I also agree with you in your statement: "Losses are minimal for a normal "tee" connection without a plug or branch flow."

I do not understand why you must "determine flow disturbance" for these modest flow and pressure conditions.

Is flow induced corrosion a concern ? Is raw water being used and corrosion may be a concern ?

If so, thicken the pipe and tee and dont worry about it.

I have seen hundreds of piping systems modified repeatedly in more radical ways than you describe with no ill effects...

My opinion only

-MJC

  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources