×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tie down requirement for rail road cars

Tie down requirement for rail road cars

Tie down requirement for rail road cars

(OP)
I was looking into the tie down design requirements for products shipped on flat bed rail road cars.  The requirements are- forward and backward-3g, transverse-2g, up and down-2g.  I find these requirements quite unbelievable.  As far as I am concerned, 3g is about the acceleration during the launch of a space rocket (?). The product that I am trying to tie down is about 90 tons. Can you imagine the force that the system has to be designed for.

RE: Tie down requirement for rail road cars

I imagine it is to allow for a collision. If the train hits a solid object at full speed it would be easy to imagine a deceleration of 3g. If you are the driver in this situation you really dont want your ten ton load flying through your back windscreen.

The space rockets have acceleration greater than 3g I believe, some jets give 5 or 6g when turning (which the pilots have to wear special suits for).

csd

RE: Tie down requirement for rail road cars

(OP)
csd72,

I seem to agree with you. But,

These rail cars with heavy loads that I am mentioning probably cannot achieve more than 40 miles/hr at full speed.  So, for an example, if it meets with a collision and comes to a complete stop in 2 seconds (which is unlikely considering all types of deformations,etc), then deceleration is only 29 ft/sec^2, which is even less than 1g (32.2 ft/sec^2).

RE: Tie down requirement for rail road cars

29ft/sec^2 is your average deceleration.

If you think of the impact as a spring then your deceleration curve will be more like a triangle with the instantaneous maximum being about twice the average (58).

You are also thinking likely scenarios whereas these are base on worst case (i.e. if the brakes fail going down a hill).

Do not mess with it, you dont want to be facing a court with your only defence being 'I didnt think it was likely'.

csd

RE: Tie down requirement for rail road cars

These are probably shock loads, as well, not sustained loads.  For example, pulling the slack out of couplers sends a shock down the train that could be the 3g force.  If the floor under you accelerates at 3g for 1 or 2 inches, it's not going to bother you much, but on a rigid item, that could be a large force.

I think there is a rail engineering forum here, you might check there as well.

RE: Tie down requirement for rail road cars

In my experience, the railroad will not transport a load that is not tied down to their specifications.  I recently transported several million pounds of steel about 1200 miles via rail.  It seemed that no matter how well we tied down the loads, they shifted when the cars were bumped.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources