×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Conductor Sizing Question

Conductor Sizing Question

Conductor Sizing Question

(OP)
Hello,

I'm having trouble figuring out what exactly is the legal way to size conductors in one of my typical motor circuits.  My typical circuit includes an MCP (motor circuit protector) and overload protection inside of the MCC and a fusible disconnect switch near the motor.  Logically, I would size the conductors based on the FLA of the motor (1.25x), because the overload protection would not permit the circuit to reach a higher ampacity.  But is this the legal way based on the NEC?  If not, how should I go about this?

Here is an example: MCP = 30A, DISC = 30A, FUSE = 25A, MOTOR = 10HP (14 FLA), OL set to trip at just above 14FLA.

Thanks!

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

Yes.  Size the conductor at 125% of motor FLA and size other protective devices per Article 430 in NEC.  There is no direct relationship between the feeder size and the breaker/fuse size for motor circuits.  

This is not the same procedure used for general purpose feeders.  

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

Motor branch circuit sizing is one the exception permitted in NEC where OCPD's ampacity can be greater than that of the conductors to allow for motor starting current.

The motor branch circuit breaker or fuses only provide short circuit protection.  However, there is overload protection in form of the motor overload protection. protection.  Do as what dpc said.

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

Hi folks: I am not in the US and I don't have a current copy of the NEC.
Question: Have the Rules been changed? I remember the NEC requiring most motor conductors to be sized based on the horsepower with the FLA being determined from the tables rather than nameplate rating. This ensures that the wiring for a given horsepower motor is adequate for all motors of that horsepower, should a high efficiency motor be replaced with a lower efficiency motor.
Thanks
respectfully

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

waross

Basically, yes - you are supposed to use the FLA data in the NEC Tables.  It hasn't always been that way, but it is now. It's Article 430.6.   

For motors less than 1200 rpm, and where the nameplate FLA is higher than the table, you have to use the nameplate value.  

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

Thanks dpc
Respectfully

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

I'm a bit surprised that no-one asked, "just where in the NEC does it permit you to size motor branch circuit conductors any differently than any other conductor?!?"  There's so much misinformation thrown around with regards to Code requirements, you should never accept what anyone tells you about the Code without asking for a Code reference (or finding it yourself).

Anyway, NEC permits you to size motor conductors (and a few other specific types of feeders and branch-circuit conductors) differently from most other branch circuits in 240.4(G).

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

(OP)
Ok, glad to hear i've been doing my job correctly.  Thanks for the code reference peebee. (was asking that question in the back of my mind)..... I'm also assuming that the conductor sizes of the other types of most common circuits I run across are based on protection devices.  This mainly includes heaters and panel/receptacle feeder circuits.

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

You should read all of Article 240 in the NEC.  

In particular, 240.4.

The NEC Handbook (NFPA) is also a good investment - although you should wait for the 2008 version at this point.  

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

peebee and timjturner:

Article NEC 430.

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

rbulsara:  that's just what 240.4(G) says!  :)

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

Peebee:

It better!!:)

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

Timjturner:

Since you have a fused disconnect switch next to the motor, The feeder from MCC to Fused disconnect switch falls under branch circuit (not a motor circuit/feeder) and therefore, the correct wire size for your example is #10AWG. Now, if you use a non-fused disconnect switch, then the whole circuit will be considered a motor feeder/circuit and NEC allows using #14 AWG wire on it (based on 125% of FLA). Hope this helps.

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

rnpe:

I disagree.  I don't see how adding a fuse to a circuit would result in a requirement for a larger conductor size.

I follow your logic & reasoning, I just don't agree with that interpretation.  There may well be plenty of AHJ's who do agree with you, though.

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

waross,

Quote:

Hi folks: I am not in the US and I don't have a current copy of the NEC.
While not the easiest to use and you can't cut and paste or print, you can view the NEC online here.
http://www.nfpa.org/freecodes/free_access_agreement.asp?id=7005SB
The NFPA has made all of there codes and standards available in this manner.
Don

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

Where does the 125% come from?  I think it is only required when the motor is likely to be used in continous operation i.e. more than 3 hours.

John

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

ducks13 -- If you fall under the jurisdiction of NEC 430.22, you'd be thinking wrong.

RE: Conductor Sizing Question

There are some exceptions to the 125% rule for intermittent duty motors, but basically, every motor is considered continuous duty unless it fits the few categories listed and you can prove it to the AHJ.

The 3 hour concept is for general purpose feeder loads and has nothing to do with sizing motor feeders.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources