×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Timber Bulkhead Design

Timber Bulkhead Design

Timber Bulkhead Design

(OP)
I am currently designing a tied back timber bulkhead to serve as a bridge abutment.  The bulkhead is tied back near the top and there are two rows of timber walers. The timber walers are sandwiched between the piles and the timber sheeting planks. I have not had any luck finding design examples that deal with the design of timber bulkheads with multiple rows of walers.  My problem lies in determining the distribution of the loads on the walers from the lateral earth pressure.  Due to the flexibility of the bulkhead wall the lower waler cannot be treated as a fixed support and I was wondering how others have approached this type of design.  Does anyone know of any design examples or has experience in designing timber bulkheads with multiple rows of walers?

RE: Timber Bulkhead Design

Please give more information.  Do you have soldier beams (piles)?  How many rows of tiebacks are there?  Is the bulkhead temporary or permanent? Are the sheeting planks vertical between wales or horizontal between soldier beams?  Is there water in front of this bulkhead?  How high is the bulkhead?  Is the bulkhead supporting a surcharge from the abutment footing or is the abutment pile supported?

RE: Timber Bulkhead Design

If this bulkhead is for a highway bridge, you probably should be following the requirements of the state DOT, AASHTO, and FHWA for anchored retaining walls.

RE: Timber Bulkhead Design

(OP)
Here are the particulars about the wall:

1. 12" timber piles spaced at 4'-0" on centers.  Every other pile is tied back to a drag pile.
2. Timber sheeting planks are vertical 2"x8" sheets in two layers (ship lapped)
3. The bulkhead is permanent since it will act as a bridge abutment.
4. There is water in front of the bulkhead but it is located within a stream that runs dry during summer months.
5. The distance from the top of the wall to the stream bed is approximately 11 feet.
6. The superstructure (glulam deck panels) rest on a timber pile cap which is the only vertical loading on the piles.
7. Walers are 6"x8" timber planks and spaced at 3'-6" on center.  There are two rows of walers.

RE: Timber Bulkhead Design

Assuming you have cohesionless material behind the bulkhead, for two rows of walers your pressure would be
p= .65ka gama H^2 where gama is the unit weight and H is the retained height. The wales would support the laggingat the two points. If the height is 11 feet and the wales are at say 4 ft and 5 ft, Take a unit width of 1 foot, compute p and the compute reactions for an 11 ft beam with supports at 4 ft and 8 feet. These are your unit loads for the wale.

RE: Timber Bulkhead Design

(OP)
DRC1, I considered treating this as a braced cut but since the only the top waler is tied back the flexibility of the wall should allow for active earth pressure to develop.  I was considering to distribute the active earth pressure load to the walers in somewhat the same manner as you describe utilizing the lateral pressure for a braced cut.  I was thinking of utilizing the equivalent beam method and determine a pseudo reaction at the point of zero pressure and the reactions at the walers.  From this I could also determine the moment in the sheet piles and then determine the required depth of sheet pile embedment to develop the pseudo reaction.  Does this approach seem rational???  Any input would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks for all the responses thus far.  I am a structures person with just enough geotechnical knowledge to get myself in trouble!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources