×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bracing and Secondary Members

Bracing and Secondary Members

Bracing and Secondary Members

(OP)
Up through the 8th Edition, the AISC spec allowed an increase for "axially loaded bracing and secondary members  when l/r exceeds 120". I do not see this provision in the 9th or 13th editions, though I may be missing it.

I have two questions.

Would any of you use this provision when looking at the capactiy of an existing installation of 7th Edition era?

If the answer to the first question is "yes" and if the member in question is a main compression diagonal in a 200' span "joist" (10' deep truss, really), would you consider it a "secondary" member?

I have my own feeling about this but in the office here we are not all of the same opinion.

RE: Bracing and Secondary Members

Without the diagonal, will the truss function? How could it be secondary?

RE: Bracing and Secondary Members

I wouldn't use it and I don't know of anything post-89 that allows this.  

Like kslee1000 typed, the truss might completely collapse (assuming statically determinate) with the loss of this one member.

RE: Bracing and Secondary Members

JLNJ
I think you answered your own question when you called it a "main compression diagonal"

RE: Bracing and Secondary Members

(OP)
I am in the camp to not consider such a provision, but I play devil's advocate.

With chord continuity the truss will not be unstable simply because a diagonal is cut or has has limited capacity. As a roof joist there might be a chance for some load redistribution to adjacent joists. One assumes pinned ends on a diagonal but there is usually some restraint provided by the connection.
 

RE: Bracing and Secondary Members

In my opinion, A secondary member is one in which its failure would only result in its own collapse (or a very local failure) e.g. a floor joist.

Any other member should be considered a primary member.

That said, I would consider a truss diagonal part of a built up member and not a separate member in itself. You would not consider the web of an I beam as a separate member to the rest of the I beam even though it performs the same function as this truss diagonal.

csd

RE: Bracing and Secondary Members

To me, a secondary member is some thing rudundant in a structural system. The failure of such element shouldn't result in drastic increase/change of stresses of other members, even the system may not fail under such circumstance. Please note lacing is quite different from truss members. The former is acting more on the stability concerns, the later is a true Main Force Carrying element.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources