×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

(OP)
Hi,
I have a honeycomb sandwich barrier (aluminum skins and core) which is held in say 4 positions. I wish to apply a pressure load to the structure and get some decent results out. Now on the opposite face to the loaded side their is a flat structure which my barrier is allowed to contact, and when it deflects and cotnacts the surface it will give different load distributions to the normal 4 pick-up points. Now say the gap is 0.1 inch, i dont want to just SPC any point that deflects above this limit, as i dont believe is is the right way to go about it, which leads me to a contact analysis where the nodes are allowed to move a certain distance and upon reachin gthat threshold they are effectivly held. I would require to be able to then get out contact forces as well as the 4 pick-up point forces.

Any ideas on the best way forwards?
Thanks.

RE: Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

Hi,
I'd suggest non-linear springs with almost-0 / almost-infinite stiffness with the "knee" at the deflection value corresponding to the gap you have...
In ANSYS there would be at least three or four different ways to do something like that, but in Nastran I don't know.

Regards

RE: Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

Hi,
sorry, my post was incomplete: the reaction forces of the contact would be retrieved on the auxiliary "totally-restrained" nodes at the end of the non-lin "springs": nodes showing almost-0 reaction force mean "no contact".

Regards

RE: Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

(OP)
I would ideally like it to be a linear analysis, and have found out about using "linear Gaps" or "Spoints" which it seems will do the trick.
Now i just need to try to work out how to use them correctly!

RE: Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

contact problems are, by their nature, non-linear.

are you worried that the contact will overload the second structure ?

is the bulkhead able to react the loading based on the 4 attachments alone ?

i'd consider the problem from a different direction, is there anti-scuff protection on the potneital contact area, 0.1" isn't much space ?

RE: Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

(OP)
It seems the MacNeal Swindler Corporation have a method whereby you can use a linear gap element so you dont need to go to a non-linear analysis for contact, so its good for simple contact analysis such as heel toe effects of direct compression of faces etc. I have a powerpoint pres of theirs which gives the quick theory and usage, but have to try to work out the "how to do it" now.

I'm not worried about the secondary structure being overloaded, but i will need to go through the motions as it were. The 4 attachments are able to carry the whole load, but as its applied as a pressure i get deflections which will introduce the contact. I'm not worried about the contact in itself, it is designed to do so in that loadcase, as its a 9g crash load. Conservativly i could size the 4 attachments to carry all the load no problems, its more of the contact area/force i would like to know.

RE: Nastran/Patran Contact Analysis

Hi,
OK, the algorythm may linearize some parts of the problem, for example by not taking into consideration the contact stiffness update and so on (which, for a "remote control" or a "gap element", makes sense). But, as rb1957 points out, a behaviour such as the one you describe, "allowed to move a certain distance and upon reachin gthat threshold they are effectivly held", IS non-linear by definition. Any full-linear resolution of something like that will be dangerously UNREALISTIC (at best...). So take care...

Regards

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources