×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Evaluating measurements

Evaluating measurements

Evaluating measurements

(OP)
I programed a PIC 18F to generate pulses going from 120 to 6000 Hz.

Measured the output with two frequencimeters (ME and WA) plus the reading from an analog TRIO scope.

In the Excel file I listed following values:

PIC: frequency expected at the PIC's output.
WA: frequency values obtained with frequencimeter WA.
ME: frequency values obtained with frequencimeter ME.
TRIO: frequency calculated from the readings (which also listed).

Readings approximated to 0.25 of a division. Scope is analogic so I had to actually read the divisions in the mask.

On the right I listed the differences between PIC value and the three instruments.

The x axis of the graphic helds PIC values. The curves, the three differences above.

My conclusions, rather limited, besides that all my instruments are of poor quality:

a) PIC could be not producing the expected frequency. (But MPSIM, with current software, allows to think that I am getting the best of it with values close to the Hz in all cases).

b) I am very bad at reading my scope.

c) Frequencimeter ME is worst than WA. (Both frequencimeters are of the type embeded in garden variety multimeters).

Do you have more useful / educated conclusions to make? I will appreciate that.

Attached file here

http://www.mediafire.com/?5m4renbezsy

Agustín Tomás

RE: Evaluating measurements

I'm not going to download a file of unknown origin... how about taking a screen capture and posting it.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Evaluating measurements

I would think your FREQUENCY METERS are the problem.  The cheap DMM meters can be way off and can be confused by square waves.

PICs usually are right on.  If you know what frequency the crystal is.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.- http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Evaluating measurements

(OP)
Hola Dan,

That will make for ANOTHER file of unknown origin. No thanks.

Hola Keith,

Thanks for replying. For both multimeters, square wave IS acceptable according to their user manual.

My mistake (?) is to show round figures for PIC. Actual difference, at least in theory, is fraction of a Hertz for all values. (Nothing serious, anyway, I think). Software was writen to ensure that.

Agustín Tomás

RE: Evaluating measurements

Browsers will open a JPEG or GIF without compromising system security... I can't say the same for a downloaded file, even if it is Excel.  Your call...

How far off is the frequency?  Have you set up the timers correctly?

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources