×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

(OP)
How do you deal with concrete cover at couplers.

For instance, if you have 2" of clear cover to a bar and place a coupler on it, all of a sudden you only have 1-1/2" clear cover.  

My specific circumstance is a connection to existing reinforcing where 10" of reinforcing was left sticking out of the existing construction for future use.  It happens to be in a waste water treatment plant, so I'm more worried about corrosion than development length.

I also have to provide a similar detail for the next guy who comes around to add further future construction.

I think my options are.  1) Coat the coupler and the reinforcing around it with something like Sika Armatec 110 Epocem which is a corrosion inhibitor (anyone have any experience with Armatec?  Any alternative products?), 2) coat the surface of the wall with a waterproofer (subject to maintenance, yuck), 3) provide 3" of clear cover for the next guy so he doesn't have an issue (seems inefficent).

I'm interested to hear your thoughts.

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

I would say coating would be the best option.  Moving the bars in just for cover at a single point seems unreasonable.  If you don't have sufficient cover, however, there is the fire resistance concern but since you are in a wastewater plant area, perhaps not a big concern.

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

(OP)
If my basins catch on fire, something has gone seriously wrong.

JAE, Have you ever used Armatec 110 or a similar product?  

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

Talk to the manufacturer about this.

The couplers that I have used in the past were justified on the basis of:

1. The coupler is made of a material with lower corrossion potential than reinforcing steel.

2. The area of the coupler exposed to more heat under fire is negligible compared to the overall volume of the bars that it is attached to.

I am sure these were based on tests e.t.c. that the manufacturer had done (it was a while ago), so the manufacturer of your couplers may have similar information.

csd

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

hot-dipped galvanized rebar mech splices are available. Stainless steel rebar and couplings are available too:)

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

Be careful to use stainless steel and normal steel together. It can accelerate the corrosion in the normal steel.

csd

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

Have not used Armatech.  Sorry.

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

Since ACI 318 does not clearly spell out where cover is measured from, for the situation you have described, why not check ICC-ES legacy reports for guidance? In these reports, cover is measured from surface of coupler sleeve. I did not dig deep enough to ascertain whether a reduction in cover is allowed if sleeve is coated.

Do a search for the word coupler...and review reports. http://www.icc-es.org/reports/index.cfm?search=search

Open any of the pdf files and do a search for the word cover.


RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

ACI-318 building code allows tolerences on clear cover.  This tolerence can even be a negative number.

We use Sika Armatec-110 quite frequently as bonding agent during concrete repair work.  Once or twice we have used this product as corrosion inhibitor as well, when the rebars in concrete members were left exposed to weather over a long period of time.  In this case just before we do the final repair, we apply the armatec once again, because if the epocem dries it can be a bond breaker between concrete and steel.

RE: Concrete Cover at Reinforcing Couplers

Degussa (Masterbuilders, or whatever they are called now) makes a galvanic anode that can be embedded in the concrete.  Some people call them "hockey pucks".  In my Degussa book, they are called Emaco Corr-stops CI.  Perhaps these could be used instead of or in addition to galvanized couplers.  I have used them for concrete rehab projects, but I don't see why they cannot be used for new construction when there is a situation like Gumpmaster's.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources