×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NASTRAN-CATIA

NASTRAN-CATIA

NASTRAN-CATIA

(OP)
Hello everybody,

I'm a FEM user who works with FEMAP/PATRAN-NASTRAN. I have just discover that CATIA has a module that allows FEM resolution.

I wonder, which of these two solvers (NASTRAN or CATIA) gives more accurate results? In other words, which is better?

I assume that the advantage of CATIA could be less time consumed than NASTRAN, since the item to analysed/design is yet modelled.

Thank you

Pesog

RE: NASTRAN-CATIA

If I were a FEM user, I would not compare a FEM software to a CAD software having some FEM related modules.

In fact, I would not compare any two FEM software without specifying the exact type of problem I want to solve.

In general, for a given problem to be analyzed using a FEM software, the major inacurracies are generated by the wrong understanding of FEM by the FEM users and by modeling mistakes rather than by the intrinsic software accuracy.

RE: NASTRAN-CATIA

Hi,
I perfectly agree with Xerf.
These are two different things.
The Catia FE module, (or, as other examples, the FE tool of Unigraphics NX, and SolidWorks' CosmosExpress which is by far on the lower-end side), is primarily intended for the designer who wants/needs to check his design in the early stages. In order to do that, of course, the designer must also have knowledge of mechanical calculations. However, an extremely "realistic" simulation is not really intended.
On the other hand, we have "specialistic" tools which are meant to be used by specialized people, the "calculation men". The work of these people is focused on simulating the reality as close as POSSIBLE, or more in general analyzing it with a deep knowledge of the simplifying assumptions (you can never simulate reality at 100%, except in some rare and simple cases...). There you will find extensive control about the meshing, the element formulations, the constitutive laws, the BC conditions, the interactions between components, etc etc...

Regards

RE: NASTRAN-CATIA

Wont say much, but its another pretty tool for people to use without having any knowledge about the basics. If you want a steak you go to a butcher, not a grocer.
I bet if you look in the user manual in Catia about that function, it will probably sum up the whole stress analysis in 2 paragraphs.
And any engineer worth his/her salt will preliminary size a part before designing it so there is no immediate need to go to FE to see if the idea is worth pusuing. I'm all for designers to work prelim calcs, but when they try to start shoving FEM plots under your nose saying that their design is wonderful when in reality is useless is something i can hardly wait for!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources