×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rainfall distributions, Rational Method and SCS

Rainfall distributions, Rational Method and SCS

Rainfall distributions, Rational Method and SCS

(OP)
The requirement is that I use the rational method for the pre-existing conditions and compare it to the critical storm.  In order to find this I have to run 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year storms for the 1 hr, 4 hr, 8hr etc. storm for the developed conditions.  I talked to the regulatory agency and normally they do not use HydroCad.   The following is from a post 3-years ago which sound like what I am trying to do:

A competitor's software has an option which allows hydrographs to be generated using the Rational Method, but with the intensity from SCS 24 hour storm distribution.  The Return Rate, Precipitation (in inches) and SCS Rainfall Type are specified...from there, an IDF curve is (apparently) generated.

Does anybody have any ideas how to do this with HydroCad?

RE: Rainfall distributions, Rational Method and SCS

Although it is theoretically possible to derive an IDF relationship from a rainfall distribution, I'm not sure why you would want to do this.  Why not use your local IDF data and create an IDF file for HydroCAD?  See www.hydrocad.net/idf.htm

Of course, there have been MANY other posts on the limitations and complexities of the Rational method.  Please see www.hydrocad.net/rational.htm

RE: Rainfall distributions, Rational Method and SCS

Psmarts answer is, of course, correct.

But why, oh why, would anyone want to compare the Rational Method with a hydrograph method ?  First, you can't really do this.  The Rational Method does not yield a hydrograph, only a peak flow.  Second,  the Rational Method is only allowed by most regulatory agencies to be used for very small drainage basins ( usually 20 acres or less in my part of the U.S.) Even if you use the so called Modified Rational Method you only get artificial triangular and trapezoidal hydrographs which don't look like anything seen in nature.

When you do such comparisons you will probably find wide disparities which can't be explained by any logical reasoning.

Finally, what is accomplished by all this ?

good luck

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources