×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Vortex sediment separation

Vortex sediment separation

Vortex sediment separation

(OP)
Has anyone worked with a vortex sediment separation facility? I'm talking 800cfs, gravity powered. I've seen references to them overseas, and that they worked well, but I haven't found one in the US or with any specific design information.

Check out www.cis.umassd.edu/gleung/cawfo/conf12.htm

Any help will be much appreciated.
Thanks

RE: Vortex sediment separation

(OP)
Actually I missed a character

check out www.cis.umassd.edu/~gleung/cawfo/conf12.htm

A cool idea... I'd like to use it, but I'm having some trouble finding resources.

Thanks for any help

RE: Vortex sediment separation

We used to use them frequently on irrigation canals to take out bed load. They work well technically but failed due to lack of maintenance.
 But I assume you are looking to use in a treatment plant?

RE: Vortex sediment separation

It should be obvious from the picture that the device will not work. Solids will collect on the bottom.

You have two options;

A) Put a scraper in to collect the solids,  or
B) Put a 55 Deg slope in the bottom to collect the solids.

Otherwise, the thing is just going to fill up with solids.

RE: Vortex sediment separation

(OP)
Thank you BRIS and Bimr,

Yes, the thought was to put a steep bottom on it to prevent buildup and direct the sediment into the center drain. BRIS, please tell me more about maintainence. This will be on the headworks of a flume to a power plant.

Thanks a lot

RE: Vortex sediment separation

Same problem as above the vortex flow  carries the coarse sediment. It needs to discahrge into a basin where the sediment drops our and is removed mechanically. If it is not removed then the sediment blocks the exit and the vortex tube fills. It then needs a lot of effort to clean out. On irrigation canals we could only clear at the end of the season by which time the tube was fully cemented with sediment. The vortex tubes were constructed horizontally below the invert of the canal, approxinmatly at right angles to the flow. - the objective was maximum sediment transport with minimum water loss from the canal.

The project was in Pakistan where maintenance is a problem

RE: Vortex sediment separation

(OP)
Thanks alot BRIS, it sounds like you know a lot about this type of project. Now the questions come...

1. You said "course sediment" was removed. Can you give me an approx size that was removed/remained in suspension after treatment?
2. Do you suppose that the basin would be reliable if we send the sediment right back to the river and mechanical removal isn't required or if removal was regular?
3. Can you hook me up with some design references?

Thanks a lot!

RE: Vortex sediment separation

The volume that you are talking about is so large that it makes the task impossible. You are talking about 30 - 60 tons per day of solids dropping out.

Have you thought about using a lake? I am familiar with a power plant that uses a cooling lake. Water is obtained from a river and pumped to the lake. Cooling water is then taken from the lake.

RE: Vortex sediment separation

Fishead

Low energy swirl concentrators are commonly used to treat storm water with sizes ranging from .5 cfs to 10 cfs in off the shelf units and up to 120 cfs in off the shelf designs.  There are several manufacturers of such devices many of whom may be able to help out in the design of a larger unit or setting up several units in parallel.
These units typically remove particles in the 250 micron down to 75 micron depending upon the type, model and size with up to 80% efficiency.  At the flow you are looking at a maintenance system would need to be built into the unit cause all that sediment has to go someplace.  
As storm water treatment devices, the removal of 1 to 2 tons per peak cfs per year is typical.  but remember your application is continuous not intermittent like storm water treatment devices.

The above listed website, is not entirely accurate on the power requirements,  there are head losses in any such device as well as losses in process water to flush the sediment away

Hydrae

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources