wood rafter thrust problem
wood rafter thrust problem
(OP)
I have a wood framed building with a very tall and steep pitched roof. Unfortunately, the client wants the ceiling vaulted, so we cannot use trusses to frame the roof, only rafters with one intermediate brace toward the top of the roof. This results in quite a bit of thrust force at the bottom of these rafters. To take this thrust force out, I was thinking about resolving it into the sill. By analysis, this results in a really big sill plate. I was thinking of the sill plate as a simply supported beam. Is this the right way to go about this thrust problem? Would I need a pretty substantial connection at the end of this sill plate? Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance.






RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
I have run into this problem before and the way that I handled the excess thrust from the vaulted ceiling rafters is to use LVL's placed flat so that the strong axis is in the plane of the thrust force. Not knowing how far of a span your LVL's will have to go you may need 2 or 3 to with stand the thrust force.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Sorry to be so naive on this subject, but I have limited experience in wood design. Can you please explain to me how the ridge beam resists the thrust force? I'm assuming a ridge beam is like a header at the ridge of your roof. Thanks.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
If you model the roof as an A-frame and put one support on rollers then if you limit the lateral deflection to about 1/2" larger rafters but no significant wall thrust.
Alternatively use a load bearing ridge beam as suggested by jechols, this will remove the thrust.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Using a ridge beam eliminates the thrust by making your slope rafters simply supported.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
I have seen two major wood truss failures in five years, one in a state building in Lansing, MI.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Structuralnerd is not using trusses. His client doesn't want a bottom chord. Your cable would work only for gravity loads, not for uplift.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
When you look at it you would think that there would be significant lateral loads due to the slope of the rafter.
But, the rafter only needs vertical reactions to be stable and it only needs a minute amount of lateral movement in the walls to alleviate any horizontal components.
Otherwise single pitch roofs would not work!
csd
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Looks to me that you need a "real" structural engineer!
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
It's true there is not a roller support at the top of the wall. but it's not a moment connection either. If you think of the wall as a member pinned top and bottom, then any horizontal movement at the bottom of the rafter simply tilts the wall slightly. The wall acts like a strut with axial force. Since the wall tilts, the force at the joint is technically not vertical, but it's close enough.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
If the rafter was set in concrete each end then it would resemble the pinned-pinned models and would therefore have very significant horizontal thrust even if it had a ridge beam.
But in a real situationwith a ridge beam and where the bottom end of a rafter ends at the top of a stud wall, then the wall will tend to yield outward slightly therefore giving closer to the pinned-roller model which has no horizontal thrust. This wall does not have to move much to make a massive reduction in the horizontal force - 1/16" each side would make a big difference.
My point was that it doesnt 'require' horizontal reactions to be stable. There are reactions, but they get reduced down to very small values.
csd
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Like I stated previously get a “real” structural engineer.
Take a ladder and lean it against the wall and place a skateboard under each side leg of the ladder and climb the ladder and see what happens.
Now take an anchor like a Simpson LSSU and attach the ladder top to the wall
Now climb the ladder and see what happens.
Do the same thing but with a LVL (as ridge beam) instead of the wall and see what happens.
Now go back and design your ridge beam.
By the by if you have scissor trusses look at the cut sheet and note the disclaimer as to the horizontal load and who has to account for it.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
The internal axial force in the rafter is offset in the horizontal direction by the internal shear. Net horizontal reaction is small. You get little horizontal reaction under gravity load no matter what the roof angle.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
This is illustrated well by bylar with his example. The reason the ladder will fall out from under you in the first situation is that the friction is not enough to keep the ladder (the end against the wall) from translating down. Once you add the LSSU that he mentions, the ladder (the end against the wall) can not translate down and the skateboards will not translate outward. If, however, you get a little give in the connection and the ladder (the end against the wall) drops by say 0.5" (this would be comparable to the deflection in the ridge beam) then the skateboard (or the end bearing on the wall) will translate out just slightly causing the thrust.
Please help me out if I have missed something.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
The small axial force in the rafter will be taken out by the roof diaphragm and will not end up in the wall.
csd
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
If you have uniform transverse load and uniform axial load, the axial load isn't taken out by the shear. Where did you get that information, or how do you prove it mathematically? Whether the thrust has a diaphragm that can resist it is another matter.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
As jmiec said, the vector sum of the internal shear and axial force is resisted by the vertical reaction (assuming an infinitely stiff ridge beam OR a roller support at the lower end).
Diaphragm action will of course stiffen up the whole structure.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Ignoring the diaphragm, which admittedly, changes the picture;
For a rafter with a horizontal projection L at an angle "a", from the horizontal, with a uniform vertical load w;
The vertical reaction at the ridge and at the sill is R=.5wL
The shear at each end of the rafter due to this reaction is V=R*cos(a).
The axial force at each end of the rafter due to this reaction is A=R*sin(a). Tension at the ridge, compression at the sill.
The horizontal force at the sill is: H=V*sin(a)-A*cos(a)=R*cos(a)*sin(a)-R*sin(a)*cos(a)=0.
Same thing at the ridge.
I have a RISA model that gives the same result.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
The rafters would have to be quite stiff to minimize the thrust. The collar tie acts similar to the rafters being moment connected at the center and now having to span from bearing wall to bearing wall. If the rafters deflect, the walls bow out. Does that sound accurate to you?
j
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
You said "If the loads applied are all vertical the reactions need only be vertical - regardless of the geometry."
That's only true if there is no vertical displacement of the roof structure (whether using a ridge beam or collar ties above eaves level), or there is no horizontal restraint at eaves level. Neither one of those conditions is very realistic.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Try it set up two rafters with no ridge with the ends of the rafters on a smooth surface and then go stand on the apex of the two rafter and tell me how long it take you to hit the ground.
Dodson you apparently don't understand the function of collar ties. They are to be in the upper third and if you take the moment at the junction of the rafter and the collar tie you will see how large a section you need.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
what you say is strictly not true, but is not too far off.
Equilibrium of forces requires 2 things.
1. Sum of Moment reactions = Sum of applied moments
(or in cases like this center of reaction = center of applied loads)
2. Sum of Force Reactions = Sum of applied forces.
In this case it means:
Vertical reactions = applied load, but in the horizontal direction it does not necessarilly mean that there are no reactions only that the sum is equal to zero. You can also have equal and opposite horizontal reactions on both sides!.
csd
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
That must be a local definition, not a global one.
By the definition I use collar ties are located higher than the lower rafter support.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
Are you suggesting that if you had a roller-roller support on a sloped beam that the beam would just roll away with vertical-only loads?
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
For a real roller support, the vertical reaction at each end of a sloped beam would not be in line with the center of the roller axis. The horizontal distance would cause a moment and would cause the roller to rotate untill the beam fell off the rollers.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
That is only true if the bottom of the sloped rafter is not notched to bear on the top plate (roller), correct? If it is notched, then you will not have the resulting eccentricity that you are talking about, correct?
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
If you had two roller supports on the rafter, and the rafter supporting vertical load, the rafter woul have an unbalanced horizotal reaction and the rafter would roll away.
There are not two roller supports, but unless the rafters conections are rigid, they would be modeled as pinned. Thus the sills will need to reesist a horizotal reaction.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
If there is a roller support there can be no horizontal reaction.
A sloping beam on rigid supports, with vertical loads, will only have vertical reactions.
Only if there is a vertical displacement of the top support (such as deflection of the ridge beam) will there be a horizontal reaction (or displacement) at the lower support.
If the top support is a vertical roller and the bottom support is a horizontal roller only then the beam will roll away ie. ladder on skateboard.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
As I said in a previous post, the "rolling away" of the beam will only happen if the beam is not notched to bear vertically on the wall (roller).
I agree with apsix.
RE: wood rafter thrust problem
CSD72 said essentially the same thing earlier in this thread, but with some of the recent posts, I think it needed to be repeated. I think you are right on target.
On your third point, I believe that, for a ridge supported rafter, normally the result at the rafter plate is horizontal displacement, and the horizontal reaction is small enough to be ignored.