×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

wood rafter thrust problem
5

wood rafter thrust problem

wood rafter thrust problem

(OP)
I have a wood framed building with a very tall and steep pitched roof.  Unfortunately, the client wants the ceiling vaulted, so we cannot use trusses to frame the roof, only rafters with one intermediate brace toward the top of the roof.  This results in quite a bit of thrust force at the bottom of these rafters.  To take this thrust force out, I was thinking about resolving it into the sill.  By analysis, this results in a really big sill plate.  I was thinking of the sill plate as a simply supported beam.  Is this the right way to go about this thrust problem?  Would I need a pretty substantial connection at the end of this sill plate?  Any other suggestions?  Thanks in advance.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

I would use a ridge beam.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Structuralnerd -

I have run into this problem before and the way that I handled the excess thrust from the vaulted ceiling rafters is to use LVL's placed flat so that the strong axis is in the plane of the thrust force.  Not knowing how far of a span your LVL's will have to go you may need 2 or 3 to with stand the thrust force.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

(OP)
jechols-
Sorry to be so naive on this subject, but I have limited experience in wood design.  Can you please explain to me how the ridge beam resists the thrust force?  I'm assuming a ridge beam is like a header at the ridge of your roof.  Thanks.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Sometimes you just have to tell the client that what he wants is not reasonable.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

You said you could have a brace toward the top.

If you model the roof as an A-frame and put one support on rollers then if you limit the lateral deflection to about 1/2" larger rafters but no significant wall thrust.

Alternatively use a load bearing ridge beam as suggested by jechols, this will remove the thrust.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

(OP)
Is this ridge beam like a header?  Do I design it like a simply supported beam, therefore also making sure the supports are strong enough?  Thanks for the suggestions csd72.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Why not use scissors trusses?  You will still have a lateral reaction but it will be manageable.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

structuralnerd-
Using a ridge beam eliminates the thrust by making your slope rafters simply supported.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

I second (third) ridge beam suggestion.  If the span is long, you might need to go to a steel ridge beam wrapped in wood.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

(OP)
Just to clarify, this ridge beam must sit on wall studs to support it, correct?

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Yes, it sits on the stud walls.  I have in the past, created a frame in the wall, using LVLS, with cross ties between windows, when the windows were directly below the ridge beam.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

I would suggest cable tension members to complete the trusses. Some marginal wood trusses may need this help as extra insurance.

I have seen two major wood truss failures in five years, one in a state building in Lansing, MI.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

plasgears,

Structuralnerd is not using trusses.  His client doesn't want a bottom chord.  Your cable would work only for gravity loads, not for uplift.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

It seems you should still have thrust from an unbalanced live load, even if they are simply-supported.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

In resolving your thrust forces, you need to consider lateral loading conditions, not just vertical.  How is the horizontal reaction of the top of the wall resisted by the roof structure?  And how is the horizontal reaction of the rafter (due to lateral loading) resolved?  If there is a system of bracing or diaphragms to resist these forces, the thrust forces due to vertical loads will probably follow the same load path.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

I still don't understand how using a ridge beam eliminates the horizontal force component at the wall. Is it assumed that the connection at the wall is a roller support which doesn't seem realistic??

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Hemifun,

When you look at it you would think that there would be significant lateral loads due to the slope of the rafter.

But, the rafter only needs vertical reactions to be stable and it only needs a minute amount of lateral movement in the walls to alleviate any horizontal components.

Otherwise single pitch roofs would not work!

csd

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Why does the rafter have only vertical reactions at each support?

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

3
Structualnerd.
Looks to me that you need a "real" structural engineer!

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Hemifun-

It's true there is not a roller support at the top of the wall. but it's not a moment connection either.  If you think of the wall as a member pinned top and bottom, then any horizontal movement at the bottom of the rafter simply tilts the wall slightly.  The wall acts like a strut with axial force.  Since the wall tilts, the force at the joint is technically not vertical, but it's close enough.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

UcfSE,

If the rafter was set in concrete each end then it would resemble the pinned-pinned models and would therefore have very significant horizontal thrust even if it had a ridge beam.

But in a real situationwith a ridge beam and where the bottom end of a rafter ends at the top of a stud wall, then the wall will tend to yield outward slightly therefore giving closer to the pinned-roller model which has no horizontal thrust. This wall does not have to move much to make a massive reduction in the horizontal force - 1/16" each side would make a big difference.

My point was that it doesnt 'require' horizontal reactions to be stable. There are reactions, but they get reduced down to very small values.

csd

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

So, I guess the rafter would act like it is pinned at the ridge beam and a roller support at the wall?  How does one determine that "movement" at the top of the wall will eliminate the horizontal force?  Say you had a steep roof with 6/12 slope, this would give a sizeable horizontal force which I don't think would disappear with a minute amount of wall movement. Also, when would the movement stop?

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

I really can’t believe all this discussion among structural engineers.
Like I stated previously get a “real” structural engineer.

Take a ladder and lean it against the wall and place a skateboard under each side leg of the ladder and climb the ladder and see what happens.

Now take an anchor like a Simpson LSSU and attach the ladder top to the wall
Now climb the ladder and see what happens.

Do the same thing but with a LVL (as ridge beam) instead of the wall and see what happens.

Now go back and design your ridge beam.

By the by if you have scissor trusses  look at the cut sheet and note the disclaimer as to the horizontal load and who has to account for it.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

You don't need a horizontal reaction at the top of the wall necessarily, if that is your roller end, but you do need some horizontal reaction to balance the internal axial force in the rafter.  bylar has a very good example of this.  The only time you get no horizontal reaction under gravity load is when the roof angle θ is zero or 90 degrees.  So even with no thrust on the walls, you still end up designing the rafter itself for axial load as well as the connection.  

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

UcfSE

The internal axial force in the rafter is offset in the horizontal direction by the internal shear. Net horizontal reaction is small.  You get little horizontal reaction under gravity load no matter what the roof angle.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Is there really this much discussion (typically) over a ridge beam?  I thought it was a long settled discussion that as long as you design the ridge beam to take the vertical reaction of the sloped rafters that you don't need to worry about whatever minor thrust may occur at the walls.  It seems to me that the majority of the thrust in this situation would occur as a result of the deflection of the ridge beam allowing the "pinned" end to translate down, which in turn allows the "roller" end at the wall to translate out (or create thrust).
This is illustrated well by bylar with his example.  The reason the ladder will fall out from under you in the first situation is that the friction is not enough to keep the ladder (the end against the wall) from translating down.  Once you add the LSSU that he mentions, the ladder (the end against the wall) can not translate down and the skateboards will not translate outward.  If, however, you get a little give in the connection and the ladder (the end against the wall) drops by say 0.5" (this would be comparable to the deflection in the ridge beam) then the skateboard (or the end bearing on the wall) will translate out just slightly causing the thrust.
Please help me out if I have missed something.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

UcfSE,

The small axial force in the rafter will be taken out by the roof diaphragm and will not end up in the wall.

csd

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

jmiec,

If you have uniform transverse load and uniform axial load, the axial load isn't taken out by the shear.  Where did you get that information, or how do you prove it mathematically?  Whether the thrust has a diaphragm that can resist it is another matter.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Ignoring lateral loads, the only reason that there is a horizontal reaction (or displacement) is due to the deflection of the ridge beam.
As jmiec said, the vector sum of the internal shear and axial force is resisted by the vertical reaction (assuming an infinitely stiff ridge beam OR a roller support at the lower end).
Diaphragm action will of course stiffen up the whole structure.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

UcfSE

Ignoring the diaphragm, which admittedly, changes the picture;

For a rafter with a horizontal projection L at an angle "a", from the horizontal, with a uniform vertical load w;

The vertical reaction at the ridge and at the sill is R=.5wL

The shear at each end of the rafter due to this reaction is V=R*cos(a).

The axial force at each end of the rafter due to this reaction is A=R*sin(a).  Tension at the ridge, compression at the sill.

The horizontal force at the sill is: H=V*sin(a)-A*cos(a)=R*cos(a)*sin(a)-R*sin(a)*cos(a)=0.

Same thing at the ridge.

I have a RISA model that gives the same result.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Anyone thought of using an exposed collar tie instead of a ridge?? The connection of the collar tie to the rafters will take care of your thrust force.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

dodson,

The rafters would have to be quite stiff to minimize the thrust.  The collar tie acts similar to the rafters being moment connected at the center and now having to span from bearing wall to bearing wall. If the rafters deflect, the walls bow out.  Does that sound accurate to you?

j

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

If the loads applied are all vertical the reactions need only be vertical - regardless of the geometry. Those vertical loads will induce some internal axial load in a sloping member but this does not result in a horizontal resultant force.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

JLNJ
You said "If the loads applied are all vertical the reactions need only be vertical - regardless of the geometry."

That's only true if there is no vertical displacement of the roof structure (whether using a ridge beam or collar ties above eaves level), or there is no horizontal restraint at eaves level. Neither one of those conditions is very realistic.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

JLNJ
Try it set up two rafters with no ridge with the ends of the rafters on a smooth surface and then go stand on the apex of the two rafter and tell me how long it take you to hit the ground.

Dodson you apparently don't understand the function of collar ties. They are to be in the upper third and if you take the moment at the junction of the rafter and the collar tie you will see how large a section you need.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

JLNJ,

what you say is strictly not true, but is not too far off.

Equilibrium of forces requires 2 things.

1. Sum of Moment reactions = Sum of applied moments
(or in cases like this center of reaction = center of applied loads)
2. Sum of Force Reactions = Sum of applied forces.
In this case it means:
Vertical reactions = applied load, but in the horizontal direction it does not necessarilly mean that there are no reactions only that the sum is equal to zero. You can also have equal and opposite horizontal reactions on both sides!.

csd

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

"collar ties. They are to be in the upper third "
That must be a local definition, not a global one.

By the definition I use collar ties are located higher than the lower rafter support.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

The rafter is best modeled as a pin and roller member. Reactions will resolve themselves at right angles to the rafter. Thus there will be a horizontal reaction due to vertical load at the base of the rafter that should be easy to calculate. It needs to be dealt with and can not be wished away. Ties, steel framing or external bracing are ways to deal with it.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

DRC1-
Are you suggesting that if you had a roller-roller support on a sloped beam that the beam would just roll away with vertical-only loads?

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

StructuralEIT
For a real roller support, the vertical reaction at each end of a sloped beam would not be in line with the center of the roller axis.  The horizontal distance would cause a moment and would cause the roller to rotate untill the beam fell off the rollers.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

WmacG-
That is only true if the bottom of the sloped rafter is not notched to bear on the top plate (roller), correct?  If it is notched, then you will not have the resulting eccentricity that you are talking about, correct?

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Agreed

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

StructuralEIT

If you had two roller supports on the rafter, and the rafter supporting vertical load, the rafter woul have an unbalanced horizotal reaction and the rafter would roll away.

There are not two roller supports, but unless the rafters conections are  rigid, they would be modeled as pinned. Thus the sills will need to reesist a horizotal reaction.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

Just to counter some recent posts I'll make a few broad statements. Feel free to enlighten me if they are wrong.

If there is a roller support there can be no horizontal reaction.
A sloping beam on rigid supports, with vertical loads, will only have vertical reactions.
Only if there is a vertical displacement of the top support (such as deflection of the ridge beam) will there be a horizontal reaction (or displacement) at the lower support.
If the top support is a vertical roller and the bottom support is a horizontal roller only then the beam will roll away ie. ladder on skateboard.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

DRC1-
As I said in a previous post, the "rolling away" of the beam will only happen if the beam is not notched to bear vertically on the wall (roller).


I agree with apsix.

RE: wood rafter thrust problem

apsix

CSD72 said essentially the same thing earlier in this thread, but with some of the recent posts, I think it needed to be repeated.  I think you are right on target.

On your third point, I believe that, for a ridge supported rafter, normally the result at the rafter plate is horizontal displacement, and the horizontal reaction is small enough to be ignored.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources