×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

(OP)
Hi,
We have been trying shot peening on our hypoid gears to increase their fatigue life. However, a big problem in manufacturing has turned up. With shot peened gears we get very bad and fluctuating contact pattern when the gears are assembled. This seems to be due to a bulge at the tip of the tooths from the shot peening that cause flank interference.
I have made some sketches to show what I mean.

The picture below shows the contact pattern at testing that we have without shot peening the pinion and ring gear and with shot peened gears (a little exaggerated).


We have measured the gear flanks with a profilometer and noticed that we have a bulge at the tip of the tooths which seems to make the flank interference. (see picture below)


The gears are face milling gears that are cut, hardened and lapped. If the gears should be shot peened, it is done before the lapping.
Does anyone have any suggestions how we can resolve this problem?

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

How much retained austenite do you have?

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

have you read the thread below this one titled..heat treating OE gears a waste ?

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

(OP)
swall
I am not so good when it comes to material science but I think 20-30 % is what we have.

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

Here is what could be happening. Case depth will tend to build a corner, and you will have higher retained austenite at that location. The peeing transforms the retained austenite to martensite and you get a volume increase, i.e. the bulge. To prove if this is happening, get some gears subzero treated prior to peening and see if that makes a difference.

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

(OP)
Oh my, that was really an interresting theory.

You say case depth build a corner and thats why you get more retained austenite. Is that because you get more carbon atoms to that place (coming both from the flank and the top) and more carbon gives more retained austenite?

The subzero treatment I have almost never heard of (same as cryogenic?). What will happen then if we shot peen? Isnt cryogenics used with race cars to improve the gears also?

However, if it should turn out that you are right, is there any other way to solve the problem? I guess subzero treatment is expensive.

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

The Austenite -> martensite reaction can be competed by a quench to extremely low temps, doesnt always need to be LN2, but thats cheap and easy.

Yes Carbon is an austenite stabilizer.

I like swall's answer.

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

Perhaps you need to modify the lapping treatment for the shot peened flanks.

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

(OP)
I found the AGMA information sheet about shotpeening of gears

http://webstore.ansi.org/ansidocstore/product.asp?sku=AGMA+938-A05

It is a very nice text which I can recommend. It says that sharp corners need to be rounded before shot peening to avoid edge rollover which I guess is my problem. We'll see if we can get those corners rounded of in some way. Any ideas?

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

even a 45-ish degree chamfer/bevel makes a corner less vulnerable.

How much of the tip is involved in the meshing? According to your contact pattern it gets real close, so maybe you can't afford to lose any flank surface.

Are you really after a shotpeened flank?  Maybe most of the flank and dip need to be masked

RE: Contact pattern problem on hypoid with shot peening

Gearen,
Until today I saw your comment.
I do apply shot peening process several types of gears. The condition you describe, based on my experience is that your nozzle are not properly directed to the tooth root where you want to have the shot peening process to be applied.
It don make sense to hit the tooth flank, the critical area that will help you to increase your fatigue life is the tooth root not the flank.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources