×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hp Rating Variance

Hp Rating Variance

Hp Rating Variance

(OP)
I'm doing some compression work on skids that include two different Ford engines.

The first one is a Compressco "Gas Jack" that started with a Ford 460 cu in V-8 and had one bank of cylinders converted to gas compression.  When I Google "Ford 460" I get around 360 hp.  Compressco calls their engine 23 hp.  There is just too much difference between half of 500 hp and 23 hp.

Another skid is driven by a Ford 302 which Wikipedia calls a 220 hp engine.  On the skid it is called 29 hp.

Is there a major (factor of 10) difference between the way hp is measured for vehicles and the way it is measured for industrial engines?

David

RE: Hp Rating Variance

Engines are usually rated for power available at the flywheel under "standard conditions" for air temp, fuel, altitude, etc.  Compression packages are using some cylinders to do work or absorb power, not make it, and the hp rating is usually an indication of how much power is available at the flywheel or front pulley to power accessories.

Hope that helps,

RE: Hp Rating Variance

(OP)
One thing makes sense--the published ratings are for gasoline and the compressors are configured as naturally aspirated natural gas engines.  That cuts the available hp about in half so now I only have a factor of 5 to account for.

Thanks

David

RE: Hp Rating Variance

As gasoline road vehicle engines, those normally develop peak torque between 3000 and 4500 rpm.  I'll bet they're governed to less than 2000 rpm as industrial engines, in the interest of durability.

Additionally, I wonder if they're being rated with some pneumatic equivalent of "hydraulic horsepower", i.e. output pressure x flow x some constant.





Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Hp Rating Variance

(OP)
Mike,
Yes, both engines are regulated to 1800 rpm.  I don't have hp vs. rpm curves for these engines, but I'm betting that cutting the rpm that much would pretty much account for the missing hp.

When I've asked Cat about how they rate an engine for a compressor they always describe a process much like the auto makers use so I don't think it is related to gas hp developed across the compressor.

Thanks

David

RE: Hp Rating Variance

I've run some of the gas jac curves and I can see about 55 HP maximum, add in coolers and such and you can get to 65 hp for compressor.  If you ratio a cat engine it would make 85 hp from the same ci displacement. so, its in the same area if you consider that the ford isn't optimized like a cat engine is on CR, valve  cams ect....

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources