×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unlinked dimension question

Unlinked dimension question

Unlinked dimension question

(OP)
Say I model a 2” cube and then create a drawing for it. When I slap a dimension on one of the sides, the dimension is going to read 2”. But I want to over-ride the text with something else for whatever reason, and I’m prompted with the warning about the tolerance no longer being live. The dimension text is no longer linked to the model, which is expected. Question is, do these ‘over-ridden’ dimensions have a name such that I can go into doc properties and give them a special color so that next time I open the drawing they’ll stand out?

Thanks,
Chris

RE: Unlinked dimension question

There is not a separate setting for overridden text dimensions, but you could place them onto a separate layer and assign a distinctive colour to that layer.

I am sure you are aware that using overridden dims is NOT a recommended practice, and that is probably why an option is not available to colour them.

cheers

RE: Unlinked dimension question

(OP)
Not to draw this out too long but here’s why we do it. Our Customer demands that the cube be 3” max. The part we produce ends up being 2” plus/minus a fourth. Our outgoing inspection department needs a print that reads 3” max so they can ensure the cube meets spec before it goes out the door. Either we give them a drawing of the true model including the fudged dimension or we create a bogus model to support the 3” max dimension. The fudged dimension idea seemed to be the lesser of two evils.

RE: Unlinked dimension question

deadeye,
Think about this.
Draw your part at maximum material condition with a plus nothing tolerance +.000 and the minus tolerance of what ever.

Bradley
SolidWorks Premim 2007 x64 SP3.1
PDM Works, Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU
3.00 GHz, 4 GB RAM, Virtual memory 12577 MB, nVidia 3400

RE: Unlinked dimension question

deadeye ... I assume you haven't discovered Configurations yet?

cheers

RE: Unlinked dimension question

(OP)
Following the cube example, the hardware we use to get to the 2" plus/minus a fourth, comes from an existing catalog of available sizes so obviously I must model them exactly as they are, tolerances included, to do internal design. The resulting part may or may not be anywhere near the Customers max. Sometimes I have the need to use the exact same (external) hardware set to support 5 different customers with 5 different max requirements. Again, I don't see the need to make bogus models or configurations just to support this situation. The bogus dimension is the quickest solution.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources