×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?

Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?

Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?

(OP)
Trying to understand how to use equivalent length or factor "k", I would like if someone could clarify the following.
Looking at the book: "Practical Centrifugal Pumps" (Paresh Girdhar & Octo Moniz), there is an example for calculating friction losses. However I understand that is mixing up friction calculated by equivalent length and "k" factor. I am attaching the example. I understand this is not right!! Calculating  friction loss by "k" factor (hf=k.v^2/2g) is directly losses (NOT EQUIVALENT LENGTH)!!
I would appreciate it, if someone could give an explanation (if there is any) why the book is mixing up these concepts...
=
=
Thanks

RE: Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?

Unfortunately I cannot see your example, but in principle there is no problem with mixing L/D with K values.  As long as each fitting has one or the other and not both you will get the correct answer. The formulas for some fittings are traditionally given as K values (eg reducers and orifices) while others are often given as L/D (eg bends and tees).

Keep in mind that both are estimates of the pressure drops and don't get too hung up on slight differences.

Katmar Software
Engineering & Risk Analysis Software
http://katmarsoftware.com

RE: Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?

(OP)
In the example, calculate friction loss using h=kv^2/2g and the valued is added to the equivalent length.
I.e:

From chart 140 l/s, 250 mm, sch 40, st
-> 2.30 m per 100m, v^2/2g=0.386

For foot valve  with strainer:
k=5.88,k.v^2/2g=5.88x0.386 m -> 2.27 m equivalent lenght of pipe

So according to the example, the friction loss is 2.30x2.27/100=0.05 m.

I believe this is not right. I understand that it should be 2.27m friction!!in stead of 0.05m as in the book...

RE: Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?


Paloma:

Go to

http://www.cheresources.com/eqlength.shtml

download and read Phil's detailed explanations on the L/D method and I believe you will disspell any problems you presently have with basic pipe friction loss.

RE: Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?


The source has apparently mixed up Le/D with k (used as a multiplier of u2/2g).


RE: Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?

The example has now become visible, and I am afraid that Mssrs Girdar and Moniz have seriously botched this calculation.

When you multiply the K value by the v2/2g as you have done the result is not the equivalent length of pipe. The result is the head as measured in column of the flowing liquid. Using your example for the foot valve with strainer, which has a K value of 5.88, the result of 5.88 x 0.386 does indeed give 2.27 but this is the pressure drop in meters of water.  Girdar and Moniz then add this to the physical pipe length - an excellent example of adding apples and oranges and getting garbage. I hope the rest of the book is not this bad.

It is possible to convert between equivalent length and K values by looking at the Darcy Weisbach formula, i.e.
Head = (ƒML/D + K) x v2/2g

where ƒM is the Moody friction factor.

The L/D value of a fitting can therefore be expressed as K/ƒM.

In this example ƒM will be about 0.015 and the L/D of the foot valve and strainer will be 5.88/0.015 = 392, making the equivalent length 392 x 0.25 = 98 meters.  This is very different from the 2.27 meters G&M claim.  If someone could sell foot valves with this low resistance they would make themselves very rich!

Katmar Software
Engineering & Risk Analysis Software
http://katmarsoftware.com

RE: Pipe friction loss - Equivalent Length or factor K?

(OP)
katmar, thanks!! I have lost a few hours trying to find an explanation!! I feel like complaying to the publisher!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources