×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

(OP)
we did some normal thru hardening job on 8740. the surface is 1 or 2 point (RC) harder than core. microscope shows no sign of carburization. why this happen? what we can do?

thanks

RE: why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

The 1 or 2 HRc point spread in hardness is not that significant, in fact it can be within the margin of error in hardness testing.

How many hardness traverses did you perform for actual comparisons? Also, the surface will still cool more rapidly in comparison to the core for thru-hardening steels. If what you report is correct, it could simply be that the martensite adjacent to the surface contained less retained austenite, in comparison to the martensite formed toward the core.

RE: why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

I would tend toward the notion that the core is less hard than the surface due to less complete transformation, i.e. the surface is 100% martensite and the core is only ~ 90% martensite (other 10% may be bainite, ferrite, etc.).  8740 does not have that great of hardenability, and should not have much if any retained austenite.  I also agree with metengr that hardness testing has sufficient variability that 1-2 HRC points on 1 sample is not uncommon.  Sample preparation and test configuration can easily lead to amount of difference.

RE: why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

(OP)
understanding that 1 or 2 RC difference may be within tolerance. however we have had this variance constantly, i.e. surf is harder than core. therefore difficult to attribute the difference to test tolerance.

another thing is that the parts, washers, are only two coins' thickness. i am not sure if cooling transformation (i.e. surf cools faster than core) is an issue here.

any comments and ideas?

thanks

RE: why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

If you can get hold of the "End Quench Hardenability Curve" for 8740 you will see a couple of points different in thin sections.

RE: why Surface is harder than core but no carburization?

Is the hardness difference a problem for the product in question?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources