Nozzle Repads
Nozzle Repads
(OP)
I have a question about nozzle repads for pipe stress purposes. The stress group says putting a note in the spec adding pads on process nozzles will reduce overall analysis time. A pad should be added wheather or not the Code requires one.
All the projects and companies I previousy worked for, pads were never added so I'm reluctant to agree. Besides, it increases the cost of the vessels and I'm not given any proof that analysis time will actually be saved.
Does anyone have an opinion as to when a pad should be used even before any analysis is done? Is this a new trend/fad?
All the projects and companies I previousy worked for, pads were never added so I'm reluctant to agree. Besides, it increases the cost of the vessels and I'm not given any proof that analysis time will actually be saved.
Does anyone have an opinion as to when a pad should be used even before any analysis is done? Is this a new trend/fad?





RE: Nozzle Repads
My answer is "it just depends". :)
Brian
RE: Nozzle Repads
I agree with your sentiments - it is not clearly evident that the client gets better value from indiscriminately adding repads (and who specifies their size?) rather than... ahem... engineering the situation and making a defensible decision.
jt
RE: Nozzle Repads
RE: Nozzle Repads
I agree with TGS4 and jte. Sounds to me like your pipe stress guys want an easy time no matter what the additional cost is. A good pipe stress engineer should be able to meet realistic vessel nozzle loads providing the vessel engineer has not designed the vessel right on the knuckle. I would go back and challenge them on their requirement for re-pads willy-nilly being used.
RE: Nozzle Repads
All, I agree that adding repads does cost more and it gets darn hard to get them all to fit in on a vessel.
Joe Tank