×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Opacity Vs Water Vapor

Opacity Vs Water Vapor

Opacity Vs Water Vapor

(OP)
We are installing a Liquid Waste Incinerator and is in the stage of Bids evaluation. Environmental regulations stipulate limit on 'Visual Emissions' as "10% Opacity" for Flue Gas. In order to meet this, one leading Supplier used cooling of scrubber water for bringing down the water vapor content of flue gas, consuming huge CW. But we are very short of CW supply. The Supplier assumed Water Vapor for opacity limit saying it contributes to opacity. Opacity definition (elsewhere) refers to only air contaminants i.e. SO2, NOx, PM etc. and not Water Vapor. The supplier suggested to get official clarification/waiver from Regulatory body if Opacity should exclude water vapor, in which case CW load can be brought down significantly.

Forum folks are requested to through some light and offer advice.

Regards

RE: Opacity Vs Water Vapor

I don't know if it is state dependent or not, but in TX water vapor is not included as opacity.  Water vapor in a gas stream off of a stack will quickly dissipate while particulates and pollutants will tail off a stack and this is what you should base your measurement off of.  But to repeat don't know if state dependent.

RE: Opacity Vs Water Vapor

Like previous poster, don't know the location but in Ontario (Canada) water vapour is specifically excluded from opacity calcs.
If not, cooling towers would be failing everywhere.

RE: Opacity Vs Water Vapor

The opacity measurement should be prior to the flue gas exiting the stack, and therefore not be influenced by water vapor as that will still be in a gaseous state.

Orenda

RE: Opacity Vs Water Vapor

EPA Method 9 for visual opacity observation specifically excludes water vapor from the opacity measurement. The point for opacity determination is at the first point beyond condensed water vapor plume, or about 6 inches above stack exit if no water vapor is present. Opacity measurement before stack release is unacceptable as it may not catch condensable fraction of particulate matter, thus giving "false" low reading. Method 9 also has strict requirements on sun position relative to observer. Method 9 cannot be conducted at night and must be done with the sun at observers back. The angle of view through the plume is another critical factor. A search on EPA Method 9 in Google or any other search engine should provide more information on specifics for making an accurate opacity determination.

Good luck.

RE: Opacity Vs Water Vapor

How do you separate vapor contibution from pollutants contribution to opacity? Out of a wet scrubber you got water-saturated gases sometimes at 70-80°C and the vapor will condensate immediately out of the stack.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources