×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dual calipers per rotor

Dual calipers per rotor

Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
Not a secondary caliper for handbrakes/ parking brakes.

This is an idea more for discussion than for implementation.

Car: Circuit racer. 4lb+/hp. Wide slicks all round. Medium downforce. Short wheelbase.

Avg. Track: Low/ medium speed corners after long straights. Occassional stoplight after hwy offramp... :D jk.

Proposed brake setup: Front wheels only. Custom knuckle. Twin calipers mounted 180deg apart. Single master cylinder for all 4 front calipers (appropriately sized). Adjustable f/r wheel bias bar. Adjustable pedal ratio.

Intended advantages: A wider range of useful calipers and all the resulting advantages (read: cost).

Observed disadvantages: Complexity. More time consuming brake jobs. More parts to fail. Increased unsprung weight. I suspect a reduction in clamping effectiveness of each caliper (compared to a single caliper setup) but overall more brake friction overall and thus   
calculations would be slightly more complex.

Assumptions: The designer has required resources to properly size all (6) calipers. The knuckles would be optimized for the proposed setup. The tuner & driver have good enough communication and knowledge to find the [presumably narrowed] f/r bias sweetspot. Adequate brake cooling.

I'm sure if this setup worked favorably, I'd be able to find something on the net or at the tracks. Searches proved fruitless.

If anybody's experimented with similar setups, as well as those of You more educated ones, please educate me.

Note: I may add additional points as I remember them.

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

I suspect you'll run into a packaging problem - the outer tie rod balljoint and the calliper live in the same space.

Also activation might be interesting - would you run a separate circuit for each calliper?

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

Hit submit too quickly ! - it sounds like a reasonable idea, but you'll also lose some cooling area for the rotor as well.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

Kurt,

Rolls - Royce used a twin caliper brake system on the Silver Shadow cars built from 1966 onwards.

In their application one caliper set was fed from a high pressure hydraulic circuit. The pressure being supplied via an engie driven pump. The second caliper was fed via a non pressurised circuit.
The calipers were 180 degrees apart and as far as I know idential in design.
The disc itself was a conventional arrangement.

The intention was to provide the best possible level of "feeL and feedback" for the driver with the minimal level of effort required.

Cheers , Pete.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
Thanks for the replies.

Greg:
Packaging would be an issue but given the wide variety of mounting locations currently in existence, I feel it could be incorporated as one of the "concurrent factors" in suspension design.

My current thinking was to run the same circuit to all 4 front calipers (i.e. the front master cylinder feeds all 4)  - for simplicity. Especially for a prototype. I'd hate to be troubleshooting any problems with any more circuits involved... Plus the prototype would have to have the option of easily going back to single caliper if a completely unexpected (and dangerous) problem were to arise. Cost advantages would also have to be reassessed (although I'm sure it would still be an advantage).

In regards to the cooling area, I feel this is where the price tag shows up for the free lunch... I debated to myself that having twice the heat in each rotor revolution would not allow enough cooling but one could argue that traveling at twice the speed has the same effect - except that twice the speed = [almost] twice the airflow (in a perfect world). So at 40mph, this setup would apply the effective heat of 80mph (actually considerably less), but with 40mph of airflow. (Consider the mph numbers for the effect being described, not for accuracy, as they neglect the squared effects of doubling the speed)

For both cooling issues (cooling area & cooling time), metallic pad compounds, variable inlet ducts (possibly thermostatic brake cooling fans) and other cooling strategies would have to come into play.

Pete
Thanks for the Rolls- Royce example. I'll look into it. Using their setup it seems like the non-assisted caliper would become somewhat of a 'trailing caliper' which I was trying to avoid (hence the 180deg) as I suspect the wear and heat issues introduced would create complexities in design (and testing). I suspect that even in 180deg config, there'd be trailing caliper effects but I feel that only testing would reveal those effects. Of course Rolls' design intent and application explains why the 'trailing caliper' would work better for them...

Any thoughts on trailing caliper (even in 180deg)?
>>>>>

You guys are making me consider a test bench setup using junkyard parts... I'll wait tho...

Keep 'em coming!

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

I have considered doing that to a 65 Mustang that had the little one piston calipers. I was going to cut of two of the flange mount bolts on each caliper mount,, then siamese them at 180* apart...
That being said the extra mount is adding to the unsprung weight.  So it seems you would be better of with a 6 piston (progressive) caliper,,, then mounting two of the 3 piston calipers..

Cheers

I don't know anything but the people that do.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
Thanks for the reply.

I have unsprung weight listed as one of the disadvantages. Considering a custom suspension with a custom knuckle and lightweight wheels, the weight gain would not be enough to make the car handle poorly on bumpy roads. Less poorly than if it had less weight, but not poorly enough to kill any hopes of winning the race. But to avoid that conversation of "how much does unsprung weight really affect a car's performance" let's assume that the car would race on smooth surfaces.

(I also suspect that the effects of the weight gain could be mostly tuned out with current damping technology).

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

Unsprung weight causes weight...I drive a Z06 and at 145 the car feels like it weighs a couple of ton. My point is you will feel the weight.
 You will need stiffer springs, bigger shocks, larger pivot joints, more bracing and the list goes on..That is why for some the inboard brake was the answer,, but you hardly see them now.

What you do see is aluminum calipers with light weight rotors even as they grow in diameter and some have made the hat section out of aluminum with the cast rotor bolted to it..

When you layout your design do it in 3D as you will see the shrouding of the rotor as this will add to one of the latest problems in disk brakes. Which is transferring heat into the rim and destroying the tire.

But don't give up on trying another solution there are plenty of people here that will keep you honest. Thats why I post, isolated thought is ignorance..

Cheers

I don't know anything but the people that do.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

I've pondered this before myself, and I know it has been used in racing applications...Nissan Primera?...I think that in an ideal setup one perfectly sized caliper per corner has advantages, however, the perfect single caliper can will cost considerably more than say 2 Wilwood Dynalites for each front wheel. Plus the smaller calipers will probably resist heat-soak for a longer period of time, make this work and take some pictures!!

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

I've pondered this before myself, and I know it has been used in racing applications...Nissan Primera?...I think that in an ideal setup one perfectly sized caliper per corner has advantages, however, the perfect single caliper can (will) cost considerably more than say 2 Wilwood Dynalites for each front wheel. Plus the smaller calipers will probably resist heat-soak for a longer period of time, make this work and take some pictures!!

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

Brake performance depends mostly on heat rejection capacity.

Brake pad life depends mostly on pad area and compound and manner of operation.

Increasing pad area decreases the heat rejection capacity of the rotor.

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
Thanks for all the responses.

Thundair
For a custom application where weight reduction is already in mind,(read: custom knuckle, lightweight rims, etc), the quest of absolute minimum unsprung weight is approaching the point of diminishing returns. Data from FSAE and objective (lap timer) results from a tarmac rally car to support these statements. On bumpy tracks - especially in braking zones- or if the driver likes to ride brake strips, then it does have a significant effect on lap times, but I've found these not to be the case for majority of the tracks I've been to. We could discuss this in more detail another thread if You'd like.

The example of decreasing amount of observed inboard brakes also support the diminishing returns argument.

Revoltrise
If it continues to look somewhat promising, I might setup a bench rig to conduct some tests and see where it goes from there. I'm waiting to hear the compelling argument that makes it clear why nobody else is doing it currently (that I know of).

Pat
I think You've pinpointed a major flaw in the setup. However, heat rejection capacity of the rotor in a moving medium (air) is also related to the medium, it's thermal characteristics and blah, blah, blah (I'm sure You already know all that). Basically, with better cooling one should be able to remedy the 'heat soak' problem. Also, with relatively open design, one could aim to match the [pad area]: [rotor area] of the more conventional racing pad/ rotor combination, all be it at a significantly reduced cost (as opposed to just slapping two huge calipers and the biggest pads that will fit on there).

Anyone have any papers to recommend regarding pad area and heat rejection? (About to go search)

(And here I was thinking I wouldn't be using matlab for a while again...)

>>>>>

I'm starting to daydream about the Tyrrell P34 again... Keep me in check please.

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

The simplest way to get more braking is with a bigger rotor, but as you increase rotor diameter, the wheel shrouds the airflow, and proximity heats the tire.

Two rotors interferes with both radiation and convection cooling of the rotor.  Still it might be effective if you use a smaller rotor, so the wheel doesn't interfere with the air flow as much.

You can't afford big calipers, but you can afford special knuckles?  That doesn't compute.

Can you get _enough_ braking with a more conventional setup?

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
Thanks for the reply.

To ensure we're on the same page, I'm talking about using dual caliper per rotor per (front) wheel, not dual rotors per front wheel. Off the top of my head,  can think of 3 reservations against using dual rotors...

Quote:


You can't afford big calipers, but you can afford special knuckles?  That doesn't compute.

That's not the case but here're two legitimate examples that could justify it if that were the case:

1) Access to a fabrication & machine shop with relevant computer software and experience for knuckle manufacturing. No experience with caliper manufacturing.

2) Within a specific finite budget, gains in the suspension department may be more effective than in the braking department. Budget allocated accordingly.
 
I'm sure I could acheive the same (probably better due to available data) braking ability with a conventional setup. I'm also never content with conventional :D

The purpose of my question is more for exploration than for a particular application.

Please feel free to critique the details proposed.

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

I meant to write "two calipers" of course.

But I had been thinking about two rotors, also.  I.e. with 4WD type spindles, you could put another rotor on the inboard side of the knuckle, where it could have better cooling than the one on the outboard side.  Sort of like inboard brakes without the u-joints and halfshafts.

I'd rather trust my bones to homemade calipers than homemade knuckles.  YMMV.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)

Quote:


I'd rather trust my bones to homemade calipers than homemade knuckles.  YMMV.

Lol! I wouldn't trust my bones with niether! (given the implication of 'homemade'). Of course if the design includes sound engineering logic and is being designed on a computer in a home office, I'd be willing to reconsider...

Interesting idea of the 'inboard side' mounted rotors. Sounds potentially obtrusive to the suspension members for most performance oriented double wishbones. Of course my thoughts are undeveloped regarding that setup.

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

Several Japanese and I am sure some European high performance mass production road cars have 4 spot callipers standard.

Why not just buy a set from a junk yard.

Things that spring to mind are Mitsubishi Lance EVO, Nissan Skyline GTR, Subaru WRX, Nissan Pulsar GTI-R etc etc

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

Bettonracing17 ".. I debated to myself that having twice the heat in each rotor revolution would not allow enough cooling but one could argue that traveling at twice the speed has the same effect - except that twice the speed = [almost] twice the airflow (in a perfect world). So at 40mph, this setup would apply the effective heat of 80mph (actually considerably less), but with 40mph of airflow. (Consider the mph numbers for the effect being described, not for accuracy, as they neglect the squared effects of doubling the speed)"

Doubling the number of pads does not create more heat. You are changing the kinetic energy (motion) into heat. So at the same speed and nearly the same mass (probably a slight increase with the 4 caliper set-up) you would generate almost the identical amount of heat. And I will assume that the current calipers generate the forces you require - so in reality each of the four calipers will only be doing half of the work your current ones are.

So from a performance stance you are decreasing your rotor cooling and increasing your sprung mass to run a more complicated braking system that may be cheaper. Doesn't sound like a road I would take.

I agree with Pat - look for production 4 pot calipers instead.

ISZ

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
I interpret Your reply as recommending calipers from performance vehicles to be used in single caliper per rotor configuration.

If this is the case, I think I may have incorrectly created the impression that I'm asking about this setup due to lack of funding and looking for a cheap setup.

Please discard this interpretation and look beyond the cost advantage.
>>>>>

It seems the primary disadvantage is the decrease of rotor heat rejection (increase in pad area) with unsprung weight coming in a close second.

I'm now considering a test rig...

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
Apparently You posted while I was typing last night. The previous reply was directed to Pat.

Pretty compelling argument regarding not doubling the heat. The excerpt You quoted was more in regards to the amount of time (or degrees of revolution) the rotor has to cool before being reheated by the next set of pads but I guess Your argument explains that only half the energy is being converted per set of pads (as opposed to doubling it).

I'm also concluding that even in an application designed to create more braking force, the heat rejection issue multiplies and the [theoretical] braking force advantage of the proposed setup starts rapidly approaching zero...

I'm starting to understand why nobody's doing it (publicly)...

Thanks for Your time and inputs.

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

From your OP

Quote:

Intended advantages: A wider range of useful calipers and all the resulting advantages (read: cost).

I can see no other interpretation.

If you can see no other advantages than the one you just dismissed, and you see several disadvantages, why are you pursuing this.

Why do you change your parameters when the answer does not support your case. Is this work related or are you just wasting our time for your amusement.

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

(OP)
Thanks for Your reply.

Quote:


Quote:

Intended advantages: A wider range of useful calipers and all the resulting advantages (read: cost).

I can see no other interpretation.

My intended (expected?) interpretation was that cost would be the primary (overall?) advantage but the other advantages of having a wider range of calipers (such as pad options, rotor thicknesses, mounting type, piston arrangement, availability, serviceability, etc) would also be considered in the assessment of the setup.

I apologize if You feel as if Your time was wasted but I was trying to get more educated opinions (& facts) on the setup, which I have attained from the posts of Yourself and others. If I've somehow offended You (or anybody else) by asking for Your opinions on other aspects of the setup, rest assured, that was not my intention.

I'm unable to find where I've changed the parameters as opposed to asking You (and others) to include other parameters that seemed to be ignored in Your recommendations.

I've concluded that the setup is less ideal than initially expected (butter knife to cut bread?), primarily due to the heat rejection issue. For equal performance to a single caliper setup, the heat rejection issue seems to have a counterproductive effect as opposed to an 'advantage reduction' effect. That being said, I rest the case for the "dual calipers".

FTR, this is not for work and is more for 'amusement'. If I've violated the spirit of the forum, please feel free to delete the thread.

Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

RE: Dual calipers per rotor

Hi, we just completed a sand rail (kart) which has inboard rear brake (way more than needed) and had  single piston caliper front brakes. These were not quite enough so we installed as large of disc as would fit within the wheel. About 2" larger in dia. still using the single caliper. Still not quite enough but much better. Then we found a double piston caliper very slightly larger (bulk) with slightly smaller pistons. Again much improved but still not quite enough. Next step was a smaller bore master cylinder to increase the pressure. This really did the job. The final step was to install a 2# residual valve right at the master cylinder. This reduced the stroke considerably and improved the feel. Over all we added only a few ounces for the larger discs and a couple for the slightly larger calipers. Now the braking on this insanely fast kart is almost as good as its accelleration.  Overall cost was very small as we made our own brackets (all modeled on SW), modified stock discs, purchased over the counter stock calipers and pads.
We also looked at heat build up. It isn't really there. Maybe the discs are just too small and the forces are not high enough.  7 guys flogged this little sand rail for an entire day and there were no brake problems. No other problems either. The discs got a little warm..you surely didn't want to touch them and the master cyl was barely warm to the touch.  

Call it hit and miss engineering but this little animal is a long way from our first adventure into high performance.  We set set some goals as you have and met all of them plus used over the counter parts so replacement is very easy.

99 Dodge CTD dually.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources