×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

sap2000 vs etabs

sap2000 vs etabs

sap2000 vs etabs

(OP)
I am going to purchase either sap2000 or etabs
which one is a better software for concrete design?

RE: sap2000 vs etabs

Strictly for buildings?

RE: sap2000 vs etabs

ETABS is a powerful building design package.  In some ways, it's awesome, but CSi insists on including enough stupid crap that I'm not sure it would ever be my first choice.

We used it extremely effectively for tall buildings with shearwalls.  That was our main usage.

About 3 years ago, I gave its composite beam design a good workout and found pages of bugs, stupid defaults, unexplainable output, etc.  I'd go as far as to say that some of it was just plain wrong.  The noncomposite beam stuff had lots of weird defaults also.

CSi also has some very strange ideas about ergonomics.  For example, units are always either kip/inch, kip/ft, lb/ft, etc.  Try entering your concrete material properties when you want unit weight in pcf, E in ksi or psi, etc.  You have to either calculate some of the parameters in unnatural units or enter some of them, exit the menu, change the units, and re-enter the menu for the others.  I complained about this and they acted like I had two heads.  I can't think of another modern program that does this.  RISA for example has a screen where you can specify that lengths are ft, loads are klf, or whatever is natural for you.

I use SAP2000 A LOT and it's similar.  Very powerful, but has a lot of the same "Why the @#$# would a programmer do that!?!" issues.

The main difference is that SAP is more general purpose.  For example, it uses member geometric stiffness matrices, so it can do buckling analysis.  ETABS uses story geometric stiffness matrices, so it can't.  The story Kg's have the advantage of not requiring iteration for second-order analyses because the axial load in the total story never changes after the first iteration.  SAP has some support for cables and more nonlinear options than ETABS.  

ETABS also has things like shear wall piers that help when trying to size the rebar between or over doors, etc.

Anyway, that's more than you asked for.

RE: sap2000 vs etabs

Kibris:

You may consider RAM Structural System, which has a pretty good concrete design module. We are using this for several years and found to be quite good. The big advantage of RAM is that you can generate concrete beam & column schedule. With ETABS you have to buy CSI detailer which come as an option with SAFE program. To generate any detailing out of ETABS you need to have SAFE & CSI detailer (it costs about 10K for all 3). RAM would be much cheaper.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources