×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

(OP)
I'm sure this is a long-sorted issue, but was just wondering about relative efficiency issues.  What would be the relative power efficiency of using eg. 3 barg compressed air as propulsion?  Assuming of course that

a) The wieght of the compressor machinery would be a non-issue.

b) A venturi eductor system could be applied to convert airstream velocity into volume.

c) Minimal cooling of the compressor output before application to the propulsor jet.

Am I missing any law of physics which makes this a lot less efficient per unit input power than a propellor?

Pechez les vaches.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

why not chuck a little gas (petrol) into the compressed air ?

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

continuing with rb1957's line of thought..

..and then light the petrol/air mix, put some sort of rotating machinery behind it to drive a propeller...

for my own education, what does
"3 barg compressed air"  mean?

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Mmm.  Close prost, but he wants to "replace the propellor" with a compressor (one made of unobtanium, since the weight is "a non-issue").  Maybe an axial-flow, multi-stage compressor, to keep the efficiency high.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Now you can use the rotating machinery to drive the axial compressor.  Then you have something!!!!!

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

(OP)
So do I take it that eg. 1000 shaft kw into an air compressor operating at eg. 50 psi, resulting airstream directed into a venturi volume multiplier will produce propulsive effect just as efficiently as 1000 shaft kw driving a propellor?  

No objection?

Pechez les vaches.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Check out the kids toys made by Air-Hog (I think).  They use compressed air to drive a small piston motor that drives the propeller.  Works pretty good!!  Watch your fingers!!

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

no, i believe you've missed the sarcasm included with the responses

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

(OP)
Actually i haven't missed the sarcasm, or the absence of creativity.  Thanks anyway.

Pechez les vaches.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

yes, the bright spark of creativity is always challenged by the fire extinguisher of experience

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

(OP)
Am I missing any law of physics which makes this a lot less efficient per unit input power than a propellor?

Pechez les vaches.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

You might want to work backwards--what kind of thrust do you need? How big of a tank of compressed air would you need to deliver this amount of thrust for say a minute? And how high must be the pressure?

When you say efficiency, what is the reference source? The power to pump the tank up to a designated pressure?

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

i thought the OP's idea was more along the lines of a water jet, that he wasn't storing the compressed air, just inhaling atmospheric air and expelling a high pressure jet (mixed with low pressure by-pass air).

consider a jet engine.  the compressor ahead of the combustor compresses the air alot (i forget the pressure ratio of a typical compressor, maybe 8 ?) but the major source of thrust of a jet engine is the huge increase in pressure due to explosive expansion (of the fuel/air mixture) within the combustor ... we'd rather it wasn't accompanied by a huge temperature increase, but you can't always get what you want.  Mixing by-pass air was a later innovation (over the earlier turbo-jet designs)  which works (i think) mostly by increasing the mass momentum flow, increasing the diameter of the jet eflux, and so reducing the losses as the jet interacts with the surrounding air.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

I assume you're talking about compressing the air in a completely separate operation on the ground and then just filling a tank on the aircraft with the compressed air which then exhausts through a nozzle and produces thrust.

Think about a SCUBA tank.

How big and relatively heavy is it?

How big would it need to be to get worthwhile thrust & range/endurance in an Aircraft with a reasonable payload?

Even using more advanced materials how heavy would it need to be?

What effect on drag would this size & mass (& hence lift) have?

Given that the performance of a car running on compressed air is limited I doubt we'll see a compressed air aircraft of any size any time soon.

That said there are various ways of using this in toy/model planes.  I tried it as a kid with a balloon attached to a little plane hung from a long horizontal string.  It kind of worked but once I tried putting it in a better shape A/C it wasn't so successful.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

(OP)
The application is actually a (relatively) low-speed (max. 150 kmhr) air-propelled ground-effect vehicle using low-pressure industial compressor powerplant, primarily because of other requirements for the compressed air aside from propulsion.  My question relates to "eg. if I already have 33% of required propulsion kw onboard as a highly efficient air compressor, can I reduce my installed standard propulsion unit kw and employ the compressors for additional propulsion, with any hope of efficiency?

Pechez les vaches.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Isn't compressed air on modern A/C usually bled off of the gas turbine?

If you're talking about carrying around a completely separate system I'd suspect there'd be mass penalties.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

i suspect that the power/weight ratio of an air compressor is probably very low, and the presumably large inlet will cause alot of drag, further reducing the performance.  although i suspect that having a bigger inlet and creating a by-pass flow would improve things ... maybe someone else can help with the propulsive efficiency of a by-pass jet.  I wouldn't confuse the power required to run the compressor as the power output; i think the compressor creates a high pressure eflux (of a certain area, a certain mass/volume flow rate).  you need to calculate the (propulsive) power of this ... you know the inlet conditions (area, volume flow rate, pressure, density); you know some of the outlet conditions (pressure, area) and you can calculate the others (density, flow rate) and (eventually) determine the thrust available form the pure compressed air jet.  then you could add the by-pss flow on top of this ... this is 4th year aero. ... something i did too long ago !!

at the end of this, I'd be very surprised if this was practical, particularly with an "industrial" compressor, maybe (just maybe) with a specialised light weight compressor.  

what are the "other requirements for the compressed air aside from propulsion" ?  is your design using compressed air for other things ?  this'll require a bleed system (rather than a simple exhaust) which will probably induce sizeable losses in the propulsive efficiency

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Ken, Google "ekranoplan"

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

I've seen the 'Caspian Sea Monster' before, in fact one of the guys at my last employer was trying to build a model WIGE vehicle.

If you don't want to bleed the compressed air off of the main propulsion you may want to look at a gas turbine APU.  At take off or other times you need thrust this could perhaps be used to add thrust (I recall seeing this proposed for an airliner, can't remember which).  When you aren't using it for thrust you could have it providing compressed air instead.  

I seem to recall something like this being proposed for aircraft.  The various ancillaries that are run off the main propulsion degrade the efficiency and complicate the installation.  By leaving the main engines to just generate thrust and having an 'APU' generating the compressed air & power take offs for electricity generation etc you could possibly end up with a more efficient system overall.  I'm not sure how far this has been taken in practice.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Guys...

Suggest You check-out the little european automobile powered by a compressed-air engine at the following website.

http://www.theaircar.com/

I am still a skeptic... however, I can visualize a high pressure fiber-wound air tank to deliver "air-fuel" the engine; and a drive-shaft with a flange for a prop... to "launch" an ultralight or light-weight glider.   

Regards, Wil Taylor

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

I've been led to believe that the performance for the air car may have been exagerated.  Even if not, given the limited performance in the car how much more limited would the performance be in an aircraft, where mass and volume are much bigger considerations.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Quote:

Am I missing any law of physics which makes this a lot less efficient per unit input power than a propellor?

Um, yes.

Thrust produced = mass of air X acceleration of the air through the "engine".

The kinetic energy (which is proportional to the required power input) goes up with with the square of the velocity of the air leaving the engine.

Makes more sense to increase thrust by increasing the mass flow than the velocity.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Riiiight.  The vegetable oil- lubricated expander/ compressor/ motor/ generator/ allthingstoallpeoplemechanism compresses air to store in the aerospacetechnology fiber- wound pressure bottle for later expansion.


Bonus question:  Why are scuba compressors lubricated with soap, not oil?

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

That would be because the lube may get hot enough to partially combust, resulting in CO, which is a bad thing to breath.

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

.... close, but no cigar for you today.

When the machine is working as an air compressor, the hot air entering the tank also carries a fine oil mist from the lube oil.  When the discharge pressure gets serious, so does the temperature.

The high pressure part of the system, the one with the fine oil mist and hot air in it, doesn't know that it's not supposed to be a Diesel engine, and every once in a while gets extra confused, and explodes.

Hydraulic accumulators are precharged with nitrogen, not air, for the same reason.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Airscraft Propulsion by Compressed Air

Hm.  Much better idea:  use liquid nitrogen fed thru an atmospheric-temp. heat exchanger, then feed the boiled LN2 vapor into an expansion engine.

Crazy?  Well, a little bit.  But my old Aero prof's. (Hertzberg and Bruckman) came up with the idea, built a prototype, and wrote the white paper that explained why the concept could actually be economically feasible.  Hint:  LN2 is a by-product of oxygen production (e.g. for medical uses), and thus LN2 is a cheap commodity.

http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/CRYOCAR/CryoCar.htm

Apparently U. Texas at Austin has taken up the lance, and continues to joust this particular windmill... (hey, how many metaphors did I just mix?  And, how does it taste?)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources