×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Water Flow Switches in Calculations

Water Flow Switches in Calculations

Water Flow Switches in Calculations

(OP)
I am currently reviewing some shop drawings from a local contractor.  In there calculations they have not included the fixed pressure loss for water flow switches.  The project is being designed to NFPA 13, 1999 edition.  I believe that a flow switch is considered a “device that affects sprinkler discharge”.  After reading the Memo from Potter dated 11/24/03, that explains the friction loss for a flow switch is 3 psig for sizes 4 in. or less and 1 psig for sizes exceeding 4 in.

Under the '99 code, section 8-4.4.5 Pipe friction loss shall be calculated in accordance with the Hazen-Williams formula with C values from Table 8-4.4.5.

(a)    Include pipe, fittings, and devices such as valves, meters, and strainers, and calculate elevation changes that affect the sprinkler discharge.

In the ’02 code, section 14.4.4.5, the above was changed to “(1) Include pipe, fittings, and devices such as valves, meters, flow switches in pipe 2 in. or less in size, and strainers, and calculate elevation changes that affect the sprinkler discharge.”

I am wondering what the over all consciences is of requiring them in calculations?

RE: Water Flow Switches in Calculations

So deduct the pressure loss from the calculations. If the hydraulic demand is satisfactory and can be satisifed at the design pressure, you are done.

If the system is designed with a 3 PSI or 1 PSI safety factor you got more problems than the friction loss of the water flow switches.

RE: Water Flow Switches in Calculations

What stookey said.

Georgia requires all sprinkler systems to be designed with a 10 psi safety factor where there is a backflow preventor installed and a 15 psi safety factor where there isn't.  

Not a bad deal at all, let's me sleep better at night, and as long as everyone is made to do it (it appears to be this way) it's the way to go.

The 15 psi safety factor is required with the thought the local water perveyor may someday require a backflow preventor.

I've been in the desogm end of this business since the early 70's  and in my younger days I used to strive to get it 'as close to the line" as I could.  Looking back most of the systems I "super tweaked" might have save a couple hundred bucks at most and what is a couple hundred bucks on a job selling for $30 or $40K? Kind of silly if you ask me.

Did a storage building a while back; a 40,000 sq. ft. building with a 6" riser, 4" mains and 2" branch lines on a grid.  I toyed with the idea of running the lines 1 1/2", if would have worked, but in working up the savings the difference between 1 1/2" and 2" didn't amount to $700 and this was a $48K job.  By running 2" I had a 25 psi safety factor.  No problems on that job for me.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources