×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

(OP)
I'm trying to find a company/lab to do some 3D surface roughness measurements for me.  I'm looking for some specific parameters and having trouble finding someone who can measure what I need for a model that has been developed.  

The tricky parameter is the standard deviation of peak distribution.  

I have found several labs that use non-contact white light interferometers, but they do not know how to interpret the data to give me the standard deviation of peak distribution.  

Can anyone give me any tips to find the standard deviation of peak distribution?  

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

Can they give you the raw data and you calculate it yourself?  Since you seem to know what this factor is and they don't.
Is there another surface texture factor that you can use as a proxy?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

Have you tried Michigan Metrology?  I bet they would be able to assist you with this testing.

http://www.michmet.com/

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

(OP)
I did try Michigan Metrology.  Don was very helpful, but he was unsure if he could get me the standard deviation of peak distribution.  It's one of the really important characterizations of the surface roughness I need for my model.  I also contacted Solarius, but they were unable to help.  

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

IMO the best option is still to get the data yourself and compute it yourself. What happens if you get the lab to compute it? You get the answer from the lab once, and you hope it was correct; plus you have no control over the data and no way to check if the lab did the computation correctly.

My advice to you is to _always_ get the raw or massaged data (say if your lab records voltages, but you want some distance recorded. the raw is the voltage, the massaged is the distance).

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

(OP)
I understand that calculating it myself from the raw data is an option, but I was hoping I could find a lab that would do the calculation for me.  If you don't trust the lab to do a calculation from data, how can you trust their measurements in the first place?  You can't do everything yourself.  

If anyone knows a lab that has the capability to perform non-contact 3D surface roughness measurements and can give me standard deviation of peak distribution please advise me.  

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

You always have to trust the lab to do the things they are good at; in this case, they don't seem to have any idea how to compute this particular quantity. Personally I want the data because today I might want "slipnut coefficient" but tomorrow or next year I might want some quantity I don't know about today, the "doo-hickey value."

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

And what exactly is the "standard deviation of peak distribution?"

TTFN

Eng-Tips Policies FAQ731-376


RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

There are well specified ways that surface roughness is specified.  Surface roughness measuring machines have the math built in so measurements are calculated automatically.  If you want something non-standard, you'll probably have to do the calculation yourself from the raw data.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

Just curious, if you don't have a way to measure this value then how do you know that it is what you need?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

(OP)
A surface consists of peaks that are assumed to have a Gaussian distribution (normal).  When two surfaces come together the highest peaks make contact and contact force develops.  The magnitude of contact force is critical to our model.  Greenwood and Williamson have a theory to relate the contact force to the separation of the two surfaces and the roughness parameters.   

I am now looking for software to do the following:
 
Locate all peaks (points higher than their nearest neighbours (4 or 8))
Work out the curvature of each peak, from the heights at the peak and the 4 or 8 neighbours
Obtain the total number of peaks in the sampling area.  Scale to unit area.
Produce a list of peaks and their heights, or a distribution (number of peaks in each height range ).
Calculate average curvature (Ssc parameter)  
 
I believe most of these calculations are done internally by profilometer  software in order to calculate Rpm etc, but may not be accessible to the user.
 
Peaks, summits and asperities mean the same or similar.  There may be differences due to an exclusion zone etc.
There should not be a lower cut-off (ie a peak whose height is less than zero is valid - but it is a peak, not a valley, ie like a mountain under the sea!)
 
I expect to have to do any further analysis using Excel or similar package.
 
The peak distribution would be fitted to a Gaussian curve.  The mean value is the "mean peak height" - from all the peaks, not just the top 5 or 10.  The standard deviation is a measure of the width of the distribution.  The magnitude of the curve is related to the total number of peaks.
 
Contact pressures are low, so the true area of contact will be very small - I estimate around 0.001% of the nominal area.  So very few peaks in the sampled area will come into contact.  The statistics of most of the peaks are irrelevant as they do not come into contact.
 
A fit can always be forced, but the important thing is to get a close fit to the highest peaks in the sampling area, say the top 100.  This distribution can then be used to extrapolate to the very highest peaks on the surface, which are unlikely to appear in the sampling area.
 
I would therefore use the goodness of fit to the top 100 peaks only in fixing the parameters of the Gaussian distribution, even if the fit elsewhere is poor.
 
As a final point, it would be useful to have the curvature of each peak listed, or some way to link the curvature to the height.  I think there is often a correlation between the two - higher peaks have greater curvature.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

I do not think that you will find any software that will automatically output this type of information.  Your best option will be to use a good company like Michigan Metrology and have them provide as much raw data as possible.  You may be able to contact Mitutoyo or similar contact metrology equipment manufacturer (or Zeiss, Wyko, etc. non-contact metrology equipment manufacturer) to discuss the best method for obtaining raw data that can be exported to Matlab, Excel, etc. for further manipulation.  It sounds like an interesting project; good luck.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

Here is another company that may be of interest. They have some software, OmniSurf, that looks like it can resolved the biggest part of your problem. They have both a demo and online version.

http://www.digitalmetrology.com/

We had a PhD intern that work on some wear problems we were having with out high speed equipment and about the only thin I remember was the he considered the peaks to conical in most cases.

Another approach might be Fractal Geometry. Sometime back I ran across a paper extolling the virtues of describing surface roughness and topography by means of fractal Geometry.  For some reason I didn't mark the site.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

One thing that you will find is that if you give Mich Met a few samples the textures will vary a lot depending on the finishing methods.  Some finishes will have conical points, other will have a direction (lay) to the finish.  Some may have no points, only plateaus and valleys.

I get an idea of what you are after, I wasn't thinking of low contact pressures.  You are going to need to do this optically.  Otherwise stylus geometry will limit you data.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

http://www.alicona.com/

Their Infinite Focus Instrument is capable. I use one regularly.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

FYI Wyko is now part of Veeco so they can offer AFM as & stylus profilers as well as optical profilers.  However they don't offer measurement services as such.

www.veeco.com

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

(OP)
cocobolorose:

Thanks for the tip, I hadn't heard of them.  Does anyone know a metrology service that has an Alicona Infinite Focus?  I found one company in Manchester (ISS Group), but their email address doesn't work and I'd like to find a company in the states.  Thanks.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

minimotorsports:

Get in touch with Paul Beaulieu or Chris Rinaldi at Excel Technologies (Enfield CT;  www.extec.com )
They should be able to place you with someone.

good luck.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

(OP)
Is Extec a lab or just a lab supplier?  

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

We can do this using our MicroXAM 3D non-contact surface profiler.  We export the ASCI file to Excel.  If you need this we can supply it. Mail me at chrispickles@csma.ltd.uk.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

If you still interesting we can try to do it for you. But we must know exactly what do you want to obtain. My Email is zakiev@ukr.net. We can measure 3D topography of surface with the help of non-comtact interferometric profiler.      

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

minimotorsports,

Please believe me that I have done extremely similar work before, GW model, etc - I would not say exactly same. Anyway, I will just give you what I gained before:

1) You insist non-contact imaging, so the tapping mode of AFM can be used;
2) When you have 3-d surface topography from AFM, you have to do the calculation youself to find/define the peaks. 2 years ago, the AFM I was using does not support this calculation automatically.
3) Actually I think I wrote a program to calculate this offline before - find the peaks and fit into whatever distribution. It is not hard at all. I do not understand why the labs won't take this.
4) You have to be quick because I always wanted to write a paper on this, but have been lagging after I left school. Just kidding, if I pick it up again, it will be purely numerical as I have no more access to AFM.

RE: non-contact 3d surface roughness measurement

The standard deviation of peak heights could certainly be calculated from 3D data sets.  However, the challenging part is in the determination of "what defines a peak".  

Is it any local maxima, regardless of its position?  Then you would have to count a small bump in the bottom of a pit.

Is it only local maxima?  Then you would not count a "ridge".

These topics are being wrestled in ISO TC213/WG 16 and some definitions are falling in place.

Try Digital Metrology Solutions (www.digitalmetrology.com) to have something developed.  Otherwise, Michigan Metrology (www.michmet.com) could get raw, ASCII data to you and you can process it yourself.

Good luck!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources