×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

(OP)
Hi there,

I am currently carrying out a buckling finite element analysis of a simple, slender beam-column structure. I am after the force-deflection curve for the structure when it is loaded at each one of 3 different locations (A, B and C).

The structure is pin jointed at the supports and a quick sketch of the structure is provided below:
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/godisadj_2007/frame.gif

I'm wondering if anyone can suggest some typical hand calculations or theory which would help verify my FE results. The results are partially verified by a (very) simple implementation of the Euler buckling equation for the column member when the structure is loaded at point B, but obviously this does not take into consideration the effect of the conjoined beam, or indeed the load eccentricities when loaded at points A or C.

Any help or insight would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

HI godisadj

Just wondering if you could analyse your beam /column
using Castigliano's Theorem.

regards

desertfox

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

For a hand calc, use the moment distribution method to give you your end moments.  Then use the conjugate beam method to determine your slope & deflection.

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

1. your effective column length should be in the realm of 0.85L. Conservatively take 1.0 (wont be any more than this because it is a braced frame)

2.Find out your end moment by moment distribution.

3.Find out deflections of beam as pin supported. Reduce this by the restraint moment obtained in 2. Use design charts in steel designers manual or code.

Why us FEM for something so simple?

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

(OP)
Thanks for your responses.

I am using FEM as I am not familiar with the above methods.

Please forgive my ignorance, but as I understand, since the structure is statically indeterminate, i.e the degree of indeterminancy is 1 (4 unknown reaction forces minus 3 equations of equilibrium), in order to formulate the primary system for use with the moment distribution method I must release one reaction force, and replace it with a redundant force. This leads me to believe I must replace either the upper or lower pin support with a roller support, but wouldnt replacing either one result in a structure that is unstable?

csd72, you mention that the frame is "braced". Does this mean that my frame is braced against sway and I do not need to take joint translation into account? But surely the joint at B will indeed translate when a force is applied to either  A, B, or C.

Im new to this method, so thanks for staying with me this far!

Cheers.

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

The methods I mentioned are analysis procedures for indeterminite structures.

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

I'm sorry to be blunt - but if you can't do that problem by hand, you really shouldn't be using an FEA program yet.

If you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent.

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

godisadj,

My reference to braced frame is a steel code reference referring to the sway behaviour of the frame.

The frame will have minimal translation of joint B. Not zero as there will be axial force in the horizontal member that will change its length, but this is usually ignored.

This is a very fundamental problem, and you really should get a structures text to understand the theory (there may be one in your local public library).

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

godisadj,

a singly redundant structure is easily solved by deflection methods; i prefer "unit load" method myself.

the vertical member would be a beam column if you're applying a moment at the intersection of the two beams ... the horizontal member is the stiffer loadpath for horizontal loads (stiffer than bending of the vertical member), and the vertical member would similarly react vertical loads ... this also indicates the end reactions of the beams (the horizontal member reacts horizontal loads, so its vertical reaction at the supported end should be very small (unless you're applying moments).

I'd use Bruhn "analysis of Flight Vehicle Structures" for both these methods.

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

You can use a mechanics of materials approach: Euler buckling of columns with linearly elastic end constraints.  This basically models a column similar to the pinned-pinned Euler column but with elastic translational and rotational supports instead of rigid supports. Boresi and Schmidt have a simple chapter on stability of columns that outlines this procedure.  Depending on just how simple you want to be, there probably is no simple hand calculation that will capture everything you want.  

RE: Hand calculations for a slender beam-column structure?

If the two supports are pinned, and if the members are beams, and if the beams are "welded" together at the load point, then there is a single redundancy.  The primary reaction is obviously a vertical reaction at the lower end of the vertical (loaded) member.  There is a secondary reaction (both vertical and lateral) that will act along the line connecting the two supports acting at both supports (as a load/reaction pair); this can be shown with a force vector diagram (for a three force body).  In the "real" world I think this is almost certainly negligible.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources