×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Terzaghi boundary porosity

Terzaghi boundary porosity

Terzaghi boundary porosity

(OP)
Dear Friends,
I have some doubt about the definition of the effective stress proposed by Terzaghi and reported in the book Underground Excavation in Rock (Hoek & Brown, 1980):
s'=s-(1-nb)u
where s'=effective stress; s=total stress; u=pore pressure and nb=boundary porosity.
Evidently the formula should adequate the concept of effective stress to low porosity material, but (maybe I am wrong) it seems to me that there is some problem. In fact, if I consider a very porous material, nb should be high and then the equation tends to s'=s, that is the opposite I expected. Do you have perhaps the original reference? Am I wrong to interpret the "boundary" porosity as the effective porosity (i.e. referred to interconnetted pores)?
Thank you in advance for your help/suggestion?

RE: Terzaghi boundary porosity

Jordan2,

While I haven't seen this relation before, it would tend to make sense to me in terms of the traditional definition of porosity, where I understand porosity to be

Volume of Voids / Total Volume of Soil Specimen (not just solids)

which implies a spectrum of possible values from 1 (totally fluid, no soil particles) to 0 (totally solid, no fluids).

The limit on porosity, then, is what is the minimum amount of soil you need to still call it a soil, rather than a suspension of fine soil solids in some fluid (air, water, etc.).

Jeff

RE: Terzaghi boundary porosity

(OP)
Hi Jeff,
thank you for your answer.
Conceptually I agree with you, nevertheless, speaking of common soils, I do not understand why for a very porous soil the cited equation tends to give s=s'.
Where am I wrong?
Jordan

RE: Terzaghi boundary porosity

I wonder if this is misquoted in H&B.  It doesn't  make sense to me either.  The typical S'=S-u is based on approximately zero contact area on a wavy plane through the soil (boundary porosity approximately equal to 1).  (I think the boundary porosity of a soil would refer to contact area, rather than to volume.)

Looks to me like it should be S'=S-nb*u.  Anybody got Theoretical Soil Mechanics handy?  I MIGHT be able to find the ASTM proceedings that far back.

On the other hand, maybe all three of us are too dense to see it.

RE: Terzaghi boundary porosity

(OP)
I have written also to Ted Brown and he answered that the boundary porosity should be in effect the ratio B/A, where B is the solid to solid contact area and A the total area. Therefore, for a material with very low porosity, the boundary porosity would tend to 1, etc. It is a strange definition and it would be interesting to get the original Terzaghi paper..
Thank you for your contribute.
Giordano    

RE: Terzaghi boundary porosity

Jordan2,

Thanks for bringing the question to our attention. I would be interested in haring back from you on what you learn.

Jeff

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources