×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

(OP)
Can the Manning equation be used for case where a pipe is running full of water?  

For example, in open channel flow where the channel flow runs through a culvert pipe, if the conditions are such that the culvert pipe is running full, can the Manning equation still be used?  Are there any restrictions or limitations to the use of the Manning equation in this situation?

Thanks.

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

It can be used for full flowing pipe, although I would rather use Churchill.

BigInchworm-born in the trenches.
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

(OP)
Thank you.

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

Manning's will only give a snpashot of full capacity, due to area and friction.  It can not account for HW/TW control, or indicate pressure head.  So, as BigInch said, yes you will get a capacity.  But, you will not see roadway topping, or backwater.

I always run a culvert analysis for an open, stand alone culvert in a channel.  I always check all losses with Bernoulli's for a system.

Engineering is the practice of the art of science - Steve

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

(OP)
Our concern is whether or not a 21” culvert will have sufficient capacity to prevent flooding of nearby property.  I was trying to verify an engineering calculation and put together a bounding scenario for maximum culvert capacity, as follows:

1.    Storm water flows freely through an open ditch until it reaches the culvert.  The culvert is 120’ long, 21” corrugated steel pipe running through a railroad embankment.

2.    Assume culvert is the primary restriction to flow, therefore culvert capacity controls total flow rate.

3.    Neglect any back pressure/ head water on the discharge side of the culvert.

4.    The maximum water level prior to flooding is 6.13 feet above the bottom of the culvert.  Use this water level for any slope/head calculation.

5.    Assume the culvert pipe runs full.

I applied the Bernoulli equation and Manning’s equation and got similar results:

BERNOULLI

Volumetric flow = q = A*sqrt(2*g*h/K)

A = (21/12)^2*pi/4 = 2.4 ft^2
K = 1 + fL/D + Kentrance + Kexit = 1+ .02*120/(21/12) + 0.5 + 1.0 = 3.9
h = water level to pipe centerline = 6.13 – 21/12/2 = 5.255 ft

q = 2.4*sqrt(2*32.2*5.255/3.9) = 22.4 cfs

MANNING

Volumetric flow = q = (1.49/n)* R^2/3 * S^1/2 * A

n = 0.014 (consistent with previous engineering calculation)
R = hydraulic radius = 1/4*(21/12) = 0.4375 ft
S = slope = h/Leq
     Leq = equivalent length = L + (Kentrance + Kexit)*D/f = 120 + (0.5 + 1.0)*21/12*.02
            = 251 ft
    S = 5.255 / 251 = 0.0209 ft/ft

q = (1.49/0.014) * 0.4375^2/3 * 0.0209^1/2 * 2.4 = 21.3 cfs


So the Bernoulli equation and the Manning equation give similar results (22.4 and 21.3 cfs, respectively).  This is a good thing.  I am not familiar with the Churchill equation.

The original engineering calculation neglected the entrance and exit losses on the culvert, so I presented this calculation to the engineer.  Then he said I shouldn’t be using Manning for a pipe running full.  I felt pretty good about the calculation, since there was good agreement between the methods.

This is an important issue because the original calculation shows a culvert capacity that exceeds the storm water peak flow rate for a 100 year storm event.  Hence, no flooding would be expected.  My calculations show that the culvert capacity would be exceeded for even a 10 year storm event.

Any comments you may have are welcome.  Thanks for the input so far.

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

If the pipe you are using is RCP or cement lined stell or DIP, the 'n' value is good. however a lot of culverts are coorugated metal.

Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

(OP)
BigInch:  Thanks for the link.  I downloaded the spreadsheet and am looking at it.

dicksewrrat:  I have to double check, but I thought the culvert was corrugated steel pipe.  The Ohio Dept of Transportation (ODOT) culvert design manual suggests n=.024 for 24" type A corrugated steel pipe.  The HEC-RAS computer code users manual lists n=.016 for 24" corrugated pipe. I will have to look into this some more.

Thanks for the input.

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

0.024 is the Manning's used mainly for Annularly-wound CMP.  They don't make small diameter (your 21") pipe Annularly anymore, but I think they used to.  .016-.018 is more typical for design/analysis of Helically-wound CMP.  Manufactures claim as low as 0.012, but I wouldn't use that.

You can easily look in it and see; Helical is the style where the corrugations "corkscrew" from one end to the other (looks liek a DNA Helix).  Annular is where the corr's are symetrically arranged through out (looks like rings around the inside).

Your 0.014 would be a poorly-jointed/slightly corroded RCP, or conservative, but OK, for a Smooth-Lined pipe, including possibly a Bituminuous-coated CMP, in excellent shape.

Signature under construction, sorry about the mess - Steve

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

Maximum flow comes from the pipe flowing 0.8 dia deep.

RE: Use of Manning equation when a pipe runs full

Civilperson.  If I recall correctly, that should be true only at a dH/dx equal to the slope of the pipe, right?

BigInchworm-born in the trenches.
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources