×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

V4 resurrected

V4 resurrected

V4 resurrected

(OP)
I am considering pulling my V4 out of storage; what level of RS6000 box should I be shopping for?  At what level did usb appear, and what's it good for--printing screen dumps to a modern printer?

What level of graphics card would be suitable?  Anyone heard of a dual monitor graphics card which will work with AIX?

RE: V4 resurrected

USB did not exist on RS6000.  The last version that I remember being avalable was the 44P, models 170 (single processor) and 270. (SMP)

The Power series is the current IBM line for Unix applications.  You are talking about a lot of money, and you had better have a good V4 gig to consider bringing it out - especially on one of those.  I'm still running a 44P-170 with V4R2.4 Refresh 03.  It works fine.

The graphics cards that were available for RS6000 were the GXT series, and while I don't know who the manufacturer was, I only remember them being available OEM.  Very pricey for no more than they were capable of, too...

I have a GXT3000, which only has one analog monitor.  I never used a dual monitor system on an RS6000, so I really don't know what to tell you on that.  

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

The model 285 has USB ports.  It has a 64-bit Power3 Processor, and should have as much ram as you can afford (as should any Wintel Workstations for that matter).  The GXT series cards are still the standard on th RS platform.  As with any Unix workstation, expect to spend a significant amount of money.

Also keep in mind the End of Support dates.  V4R2M4 End of Support is 12/31/07 (this year).  V4R2M5 End of Support is 12/31/09.  These dates are all posted on the IBM Web Site (http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=886&context=SW860&uid=swg21202560)

I'm not sure about Dual Monitor systems.

RE: V4 resurrected

(OP)
What is the capability of usb ports in AIX/CATIA?

I/O to a pc?
Printing to a latter-day usb inkjet printer?
USB mouse?



=====
Best source(s) for possible refurbished 285s?

RE: V4 resurrected

Quote (catiajim):

The model 285 has USB ports.  It has a 64-bit Power3 Processor, and should have as much ram as you can afford (as should any Wintel Workstations for that matter).  The GXT series cards are still the standard on th RS platform.  As with any Unix workstation, expect to spend a significant amount of money.

Jim - didn't IBM drop the RS6000 designation when they introduced the 275, in favor of the "Power" designation?  While they are technically the same machine, I haven't seen the branding "RS6000" since the beginning of the millenium.

Sorry to be obtuse, but he DID ask about RS6000. smile

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

Yes, it's now called an Intellistation POWER.  It's still an RS.  A Rose is still a Rose smile

RE: V4 resurrected

One thing you will also need to check about is the operating system:  DS are bringing out Catia 4.2.5 for compatability with AIX5.  However, they admit that some functionality is lost wrt 4.2.4 (e.g. 4D Nav).  
If you need to run Catia at 4.2.4, the 44P-170 is probably at the top end of the machines that support AIX 4

"Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?"
"Yes, Brain, but isn't that dangerous?"

RE: V4 resurrected

nickeaston - I have 2 big questions for you:

1) Do you have an existing need for Catia V4, or are you trying to start a new business?

2) Are you aware what the V4 market is VERY slim right now?

I'm in the Catia design and engineering support services game; I'm not finding that V4 is a very profitable gig right now.  Unless you are a proficient AIX admin, it could be even less so.

Just curious...

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

My new 185 AIX5 machine has USB connected mouse/keyboard/spacemouse and a single DVI video connection. We only need to connect to customers VPM system. It ran us just over $10K. Loaded it with 4GB ram and a GXT6500 video card - it's like night and day over the 10 year old 44P-170 it replaced.

RE: V4 resurrected

(OP)
solid7:
\
1. See my profile; my CATIA specialty for 3 years was architectural (Frank Gehry) before I retired.  There is a slight possibility of some similar contract work part time for a more conventional arch/bldr who may need some 3D modeling which V4 (not V5) is elegantly capable of...

2. If we think the V4 market is slim now, imagine how slim architectural V4 is...  By the way, if anyone cares, V5 has failed miserably in every way to be an architectural contender and follow-on to V4.  I would be happy to elaborate on this but it's probably irrelevant to the typical V5 user.  (Although I wonder how many millions of dollars and pain the V4/V5 saga has caused Airbus in the years of delays and software incompatibilities...)




RE: V4 resurrected

Nickeaston,

I'm a V5 user... but I hear the guys around me talk about v4 lovingly (like a long since dead old friend). I'd love to hear what you have to say about v4 regarding archtecture.... mostly because my wife is an architect, and I've been trying to explane Catia to her (in bits an pieces)... USC grad as well (as franksmile

Wes C.
------------------------------
No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

RE: V4 resurrected

1. I tried to get a gig with Frank Gehry.  They told me, in these exact words: "But we already sell Catia!"  Got any contacts you might like to share? :)

2. OK, I'm a V4/V5 dual user.  I have many thousands of hours experience in both, and this Airbus thing has hit a nerve with me.  I'm going to assume, for a second, that you don't know any more than what you've read.  Here are the facts of the matter:

(Continued in next post - some sort of bug that won't let me go long winded)

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected


(continued from above)


A) Catia V4 and V5 are 2 distinct CAD systems, built on 2 distinct kernels.  They are, technologically, about 20 years apart.  We should naturally expect some degree of incompatibility.
B) Airbus, behind the scenes, is notorious for not demanding capable vendors and processes.  Most companies are a little guilty, but this is the extreme.  Believe me, I've worked for them.  I know.
C) No other company has made a $6 billion dollar mistake going from V4 to V5.  However uncomfortable it may be in transition, it doesn't really have to be that bad.  Or, if it does, there was ample time to pull the plug. (or did they take a blind leap of faith?)
D) Shouldn't any savvy company have noticed such a colossal problem before gambling the entire projected profits of a new product away on "faulty" software?
E) Who would most CEO's tell the shareholders were at fault?

You dropped the bait, and I bit it...  My apologies to everyone else.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

The V4/V5 thing was not at the bottom of the Airbus problem.  We use both V4 and V5, and the Citation Mustang was designed using both products.  95% of the Mustang is CATIA V5, while the rest is V4.  V5 can read V4 data with no problem (at least in the 3-D area).  Our database is set to automatically create a V4 copy of every V5 part that is written, so people working in V4 can access the V5 data, again with very little problem.

While I do not know what really happened, I (like many others) have heard rumors that it involved the Digital Mockup, or lack thereof.  We use the DMU on a daily basis.  All of our engineers can call up a significant area of the aircraft whenever they want.

While we all long for our old, glory days (I still miss Applicon Bravo 3 at times), I don't have a single V5 user that would willingly move back to V4 (not after the first 3 months, anyway).  In fact, some of our existing aircraft programs are still in V4, and they have trouble getting help whenever they need it, because no one wants to go back.

The biggest problems that I see currently are the Data Migration of Drawings from V4 into V5.  It's an ugly mess. Even the simplest drawing revision is now taking many hours simply because of the conversion.

RE: V4 resurrected

I spoke to some of the engineers who were involved on the A380 - according to them, the real problem was that one of the major Airbus sites was allowed to stay on CADDS 5 - Catia V4/V5 issues had no real impact.  
No one seems too sure where the story about the Catia V4/V5 problems originally came from, but it found its way into the official Airbus explanation and so tends to be regarded as the gospel truth.  

"Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?"
"Yes, Brain, but isn't that dangerous?"

RE: V4 resurrected

rikman - this is *exactly* what I meant when I said this:

Quote (solid7):

B) Airbus, behind the scenes, is notorious for not demanding capable vendors and processes.  Most companies are a little guilty, but this is the extreme.  Believe me, I've worked for them.  I know.

This whole Airbus fiasco should be the ultimate wake-up call for any company to DEMAND which software their employees/vendors should be using.

(continued in next post due to anti-long posting bug)

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

(continued from above)

We've all worked in a company when they made a software transition.  Everyone is familiar with (and a few of us might even be well versed) the pissing and moaning that goes along with the concept of having to go to the new system.  Well, this is a lesson to people who cry and whine about being "inconvenienced".  Everyone should, at this point, jump up and agree that the people who write the checks are the ones who have the say in which tools drive processes.  It doesn't matter if someone is a year away from retirement, or just doesn't feel like learning, because they'll lose their "advantage".

For the suppliers, it was all about the "cost" of buying the software.  Really, it should have been a decision between being capable, or not capable.  I would have sooner been emboldened to ask the company to share the expense of upgrading to Catia, than tarnishing my company's name and jeopardizing future work by using the wrong tools for the job.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

I hope that everyone will remember Airbus next time you catch yourself, or someone you know, complaining about having to learn a new CAD system.  (and that it will still pay the same, and probably make you more marketable later on - a good thing)  Sometimes, when people get their way, they get just exactly what they have asked for...

P.S. - I sure do wish I knew why I can't make long posts anymore.  Is this supposed to be some sort of subtle hint? :)

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

Hi,

The real problem of A380 is (copied from http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/10/airbus_at_the_crossroads.html):

"The problem was magnified because the Airbus marketing effort promised each airline customer as separate custom cabin layout. The wiring for each airline version is different, multiplying the magnitude of the redesign effort. Solve a problem for Singapore Airlines, and it helps not at all with Emirates or Lufthansa."

No real problem with the software (v4 - v5 compatibility, CADDS5, PTC or DS products), or designers, learning process or whatever other reasons you will hear, believe me...Just management...

Regards
Fernando

RE: V4 resurrected

Ferdo - believe me also when I tell you - they DID NOT select capable vendors.  As a vendor on the A380 design, I was shocked by what I saw coming in.  Some of the "Catia" data for new design projects, was being sent back as a Catia translation from some other software.  I saw projects that should have been turned over in 2 weeks, dragging out for 6+ months at a time.  If that's not a management problem, what is?

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

I also remember seeing much furor over the Catia transition from various European sites.  I wish I could find the link.  Until I do, I'm just making talk - but I seem to remember that there was talk of some sites supplying data in V2 or V3 of Catia. (we're not talking about suppliers, but Airbus sites)  And yes, it ultimately came down to customer options, and problems with wiring harnesses.  But going back to what I said earlier - who bares the blame when an obvioius problem is mounting, and nothing is done to stop it?  HINT: it's not Dassault!

The other bit about designers who refuse to adapt was a liberty that I took, because it happens everyday, all over the world.  It's a really bad attitude, and it's a poor way to manage a business, to give in to those demands.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

Hi Ferdo,

According to Airbus' own press release on the subject, one of the issues they had with the looms was that Catia V4 could not generate a 3D mockup of the wiring.  

I work with Catia V4 / V5 all the time - the only problem I've ever had with visualising wiring in the mockup is that there always seems to be far too much of it :)  

If Airbus couldn't visualise their looms in 4DNAV or DMU, it looks like they weren't being created in either V4 or V5.

"Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?"
"Yes, Brain, but isn't that dangerous?"

RE: V4 resurrected

Quote (rikman):

If Airbus couldn't visualise their looms in 4DNAV or DMU, it looks like they weren't being created in either V4 or V5.

You got it, buddy. wink

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected


I agree. Management problem (at least in my opinion).

v2, v3...I didn't see something like this in A380 project (at least in Germany).

In fact, Airbus has specific rules for their subcontractors, including software compatibility. And its true also that some of them where not the happiest choice.

Regards
Fernando

RE: V4 resurrected

Quote:

In fact, Airbus has specific rules for their subcontractors, including software compatibility. And its true also that some of them where not the happiest choice.

Those rules were fairly lax for awhile.  It really tightened up about a year and a half ago.   Long after the damage was already done, I'm sure.

Many of the contractors were not capable, in the least.  They subcontracted the work, many times to people who were equally incapable.  No matter how strict Airbus tried to be, that program was too much data, too fast, to catch all the flaws.

We saw jobs that we worked to the prime contractor's specs - and we ended up revisiting them later on.  Not because we did a bad job, but because when we initially did the job, they had no idea what "release" requirements were, much less could they point us to them.  When Airbus started bouncing the garbage back at them, we had to tell them "I told you so."  But it was really a shameful affair.  Mostly because the prime contractor had NO WAY to verify that the work we were doing was correct.  It had to go all the way back to Europe to find out what was right/wrong!

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

Hi rikman,

They have dVISE (http://www.tec.army.mil/TD/tvd/survey/dVISE.html), where they can load lots of files, different types, much more then in DMU (I must say that I like more DMU).

So again, no problem with the software...

Regards
Fernando

RE: V4 resurrected

Hi ferdo,

Thanks for the info.  I've seen some screen shots of dVISE - the graphics look superb, but the interface seems a bit "clunky" - probably since the demo was running on a unix box.  That said, I think I prefer the DMU layout as well.

I'm not sure how Airbus use dVISE - is it a specialist group or does the average designer get access to the tool as well?  

We've found that giving all our designers access to decent mockup tools has greatly reduced part-to-part clashes and - as we get up the learning curve in DMU kinematics and Assembly Simulation - we are staring to see benefits in these areas as well.  Certainly, the designers feel that DMU is one of the biggest plus points to going V5 (after the 3-months of begging to be put back on Catia V4 has ended anyway!)

"Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?"
"Yes, Brain, but isn't that dangerous?"

RE: V4 resurrected

(OP)
wes666:

We should probably start another thread.

Quote:
I'm a V5 user... but I hear the guys around me talk about v4 lovingly (like a long since dead old friend). I'd love to hear what you have to say about v4 regarding archtecture.... mostly because my wife is an architect, and I've been trying to explane Catia to her (in bits an pieces)... USC grad as well (as frank

RE: V4 resurrected

nickeaston:

I'd be interested in speaking with you more on the subject also.  I have some experience with the subject, albeit in some unlikely places.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Catia Design|Catia Design News|Catia V5 blog

RE: V4 resurrected

Everybody has access, after a training. Using DMU for primary structure its really easy, doesn't matter if work in v4 or v5.

The real problem is when you come with secondary structure and all those other ATA chapters...

Anyway, a "new" add-in is also available in DMU, making designers life much easier.

Regards
Fernando

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources