×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Brazing SA-249 Stainless
3

Brazing SA-249 Stainless

Brazing SA-249 Stainless

(OP)
Our company brazes SA-249 stainless tubes to SA-36 structural tubing (actually A500 GrB that is qualified to SA-36 via Heat treat).  We're having trouble with our latest batch of SA-249 brazing properly.  The SA-36 is laser cut and the holes are dead on accurate.  Tube geometry is quite good as well, so no tolerance issues.

I received MTR's on the tubes and cannot tell much difference in chemical makeup from last batch.  Furnace recipe is exactly the same.  Here is the chemical analysis of the last good batch:

C:0.018 Mn:1.67 P:0.032 S:0.00 Si:0.39 Cr:18.2 Ni:9.2 Mo:0.50 Cu:0.40 N:0.04 Fe:Bal.  Rockwell B-71

Here's the latest that is not brazing correctly:

C:0.018 Mn:1.62 P:0.033 S:0.00 Si:0.32 Cr:18.3 Ni:9.1 Mo:0.40 Cu:0.39 N:0.04 Fe:Bal. Rockwell B-72

I would appreciate any comments/advice any of you may offer to remedy our current issue.

Thanks!

Brent



RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

BrentB96;

Quote:

We're having trouble with our latest batch of SA-249 brazing properly.

What's the actual problem?

Porosity, lack of bond, cracks???

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

(OP)
No bond of the brazing compound seen.  We can see the compound all over both materials, but not at the junction where the capillary flow is supposed to occur.  We're bridging a .005-.007" gap.

We have SA-214 tubes that did fine in the same braze.  I realize the SA-249 to SA-36 is a P2 to P1, but we've qualified our braze process for both and usually do not encounter this result.  That is why we're questioning the material.  I'll obtain MTR on the SA-36 as well and post.

Thanks,

Brent
 

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

(OP)
SA-36 Material:
C:0.200  Mn:0.780  P:0.012  S:0.008  Si:0.014  Al:0.043  Cu:0.040  Cb:0.001  Mo:0.001  Ni:0.010  Cr:0.040  V:0.001

Yield: 37,100 psi
Tensile: 62,800
%Elong: 36.00

Hope this helps.

Thanks,

Brent

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

BrentB96;
There is some confusing information here. First off, SA 214 is a specification for ERW carbon steel tubes. SA 249 is a material specification for austenitic stainless steel tubing.

What is the flux and braze material you selected to join the austenitic stainless steel tube to the carbon steel structural tubing?

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

(OP)
We braze 10,000 lbs of coolers in one braze cycle.  Some of them have steel some of them have stainless tubes.  The SA-214 to SA-36 is a P1 to P1 braze and the SA-249 to SA-36 is a P2 to P1 braze but they both have the same brazing procedure specification, and both were qualified.

Just letting you know that the SA-214 to SA-36 brazed fine.  But the SA-249 to SA-36 did not.  And normally they both come out with good brazes in the same cycle.  We're using AMS 4777.


Thanks,

Brent

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

BrentB96;
I don't see anything wrong with the ASME SA 249 material, other than you report 0% for sulfur, which is probably typo.

From my background with ASME B&PV Code, the austenitic stainless steel is a P-No 8 material, not a P-No 2 material (unless you have your own methods of typing base materials).

I still believe you have either missed a fluxing operation with the stainless steel or had a cleanliness problem with the joint. Austenitic stainless steels have excellent brazing capability provided the correct flux and braze metal are used.

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

(OP)
Thank you for your reply and comments.

One thing I forgot to add...

We always heat treat (anneal) the coils of stainless when they come in because their rockwell is too great for our processing...

We ramp up to 1910F, hold 45 minutes, then N quench rapidly down to 100F as soon as possible.  Then the product is processed & prepped for the braze cycle and placed back in the furnace.  We've never encountered a precipitate formation of Chromium carbides problem either, but could this have something to do with it?

Still considering all ideas/comments!

Thanks,

Brent

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

Surface condition.  What flux are you using? Do you pickle?

My guess is that you have a slight amount of oxidation on the stainless that is preventing wetting and flow.

The A249 should be annealed.  You should be able to restrict the upper end of the properties, unless it is your process that is causing the working.
Have you played with your anneal cycle?  You don't need the time, just getting it to temp should work.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: Brazing SA-249 Stainless

(OP)
The SA-36 comes in with slight mill scale, but after laser machining, it is then run through a (small grit) shot blast.  The SA-249 gets an oil treatment (different than SA-214 tubes) in processing, but is supposedly washed off and cleaned (now suspecting something here...)  

I've just discovered the oil used for SA-249 processing has parrifins in it and isn't water soluble. We may run some test product through (ultra cleaned) and see if we can get consistency.  Will let you know what we discover.

Thanks everyone!

Brent

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources