×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Medical v. Aerospace

Medical v. Aerospace

Medical v. Aerospace

(OP)
Does anyone have any experience in switching from one to the other?  I recently changed from Aero to Medical, and am now having second thoughts.

RE: Medical v. Aerospace

I went from "sort-of-aero", flight simulator hydraulics and structures, to "in vitro" medical, blood cell counters, which have enormously complex fluid systems, and more.  Same equations, different scale.  Bolts is bolts.  Because the blood never returns to the patient, the FDA is only interested in whether the machines produce accurate results, so they look over your shoulder once in a while, but they don't live in your back pocket, unless you screw up.

"In vivo" medical, where what you do contacts the patient directly or indirectly, or internally, is more heavily regulated, for the obvious reasons and because physicians run the companies, and many are arrogant enough to insert themselves in technical decisions despite a generally tenuous grasp of physics.  

I get the impression that within the "in vivo" universe, everybody who is anybody has an M.D., and a string of initials after that, and everyone else is just "the help", largely interchangeable, except for people who work or have ever worked in "in vivo", who are beneath contempt.

The "in vitro" universe is a little closer to the one that includes Earth.



Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Medical v. Aerospace

(OP)
Well I think thats pretty accurate for the most part, except they don't necessarily have MD's.  But non technical people seem to have an undue amount of influence / power.  We basically get direction from marketing.  When I was in aerospace it was the engineers who ran the show period.  The problem here is that you can not make judgments and or decisions based on basic mechanical or engineering principles.    The regulation and oversight is cumbersome, and the fear essentially paralyzes decision making and planning.  I think that is crazy though, the parts we made for aerospace had a much more direct life or death impact than the junk I work on now.  Also, the government was either right there with us, or we had a designated representative.

I'm thinking of returning to aerospace but my concern is that aerospace is a dying field and medical is the better industry.

RE: Medical v. Aerospace

I have been mostly aerospace. Did a little with medical. I enjoy medical. But, both you get to work with new materials, lots of changes & deadlines. Aerospace isn't dying, it's just more spread out than it used to be.

Chris
SolidWorks 07 3.0/PDMWorks 07
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 03-13-07)

RE: Medical v. Aerospace

Aerospace spread out?  I'd say it's agglomerated.  E.g. if you piss off L-M, where else will you go?  There are other choices, but not nearly as many as there used to be.  The industry is not dying, but Uncle Sugar is still pushing to have just one vendor for everything ... as opposed to the old, equally dysfunctional system where the same engineers did the work for everything, but lost their pensions between contracts.

Medicine is somewhat less agglomerated, and medical startups have a much better chance of growing rather than evaporating.  I don't mean to say that their chances are good, just better than an aerospace startup, mostly because of the much smaller amount of capital required to enter production.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Medical v. Aerospace

I meant spread out as throughout the world vs in hot spots like it used to be. So California used to be a hot spot for aerospace.

Chris
SolidWorks 07 3.0/PDMWorks 07
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 03-13-07)

RE: Medical v. Aerospace

There's still evil empire 1 and evil empire 2, plus a host of evil empire wannabees, like us winky smile

TTFN

Eng-Tips Policies FAQ731-376


RE: Medical v. Aerospace

borg2Who ya call'n a wannabee? tongue

Chris
SolidWorks 07 3.0/PDMWorks 07
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 03-13-07)

RE: Medical v. Aerospace

If I had a chance to do it all over again, I would have gone the bio-eng route. Aerospace was the route to a first job when I got my eng degree.

A friend from another eng school confessed concern that all the jobs were in aero, weapons, etc. I advised him that there was a whole other world out there in bio-eng, and he went to med school right after eng school. He probably wrote his own ticket after med school.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources