×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

isotropic radiation patter equation

isotropic radiation patter equation

isotropic radiation patter equation

(OP)
I'm trying to plot an ideal isotropic radiation pattern (meters vs dB).  So far, I've managed to find some equations in order to do this...

ReceivePower(RxP) = TransmitPower(TxP) - FreeSpaceLoss(FSL)

*Assuming that there is no loss internally within the receiver or transmitter, and that there is no gain between either of the systems.

TxP = InputPower / 4*Pie*Radius^2
FSP = -27.55 dB + 20*log[frequency(MHz)] + 20*log[distance(m)]

Given the transmit frequency, the only variable would be the distance from the signal origin.

The isotropic pattern should be a sphere, but it seems that the 1/R^2 is heavily influencing my graph.  So instead of a steady decline in power, I immediately see a steep drop as the power goes to zero as distance increases.

Are these the equations I should be using to calculate the propagation data?

RE: isotropic radiation patter equation

"...4*Pie..." Yummie.

By the way, tomorrow is 'Pi Day' (3/14). Happy Pi Day.

The number I learned was 32.25 (instead of your 27.55), but it depends on your units.

Wiki link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-space_loss

It's only a sphere in 3-D, and even then only for a given power density value. On a flat graph it is a square-law decline. Compared to short distance (near field), the power does actually approach zero (essentially) fairly quickly depending on your scales. In other words, adjust your X and Y scales.

Hint: try a log scale on the power (amplitude) axis.

RE: isotropic radiation patter equation

Some say Pi are squared, but I always say Pie are round!

RE: isotropic radiation patter equation

(OP)
Sorry my mistake (pi).  I'm assuming that when I use the TxP and FSL equations, the radius and distance (for the respective equations) are the same variable.  Given these parameters, I am seeing a 1/R^2 decrease in power as the distance increases.  So I guess I am plotting the correct 2D graph (distance vs power).

Just so that I have this straight, the isotropic 3d graphs that I'm viewing (that show a sphere) only demonstrate distribution of the signal and not the distribution of power?  (http://www.hp.com/rnd/images/pdf_html/antennas_figure6.jpg)

When I graph my isotropic signal, it in a 3d space, it looks more like rotating a 1/R^2 function around the y-axis.  Hopefully I'm seeing this properly.

Lastly, I'm not entirely sure what you meant by trying a log scale on the amplitude axis, but I am unable to take the log of most of those numbers since, most of those consist of negative values.  I appreciate all the help.

RE: isotropic radiation patter equation

To make a spherical shape in 3-D, pick a value and note that the locations where that value occurs forms the surface of a sphere (for such a perfectly isotropic source).

To plot all values in 3-D you need to introduce colour as the fourth axis.

If your path loss is giving negative values (which is fine), then assign an absolute power (say 1 watt) to the source and calculate the smaller-but-always-positive power levels all the way out. Then you can convert the scale to log if it helps.

(If you still find negative power, then the Universe will implode shortly anyway...  winky smile  )

RE: isotropic radiation patter equation

Simple loss formulas are also usually a far field calculation. I realized that one day when I was working at lower frequencies, like 100 Mhz. my answers were all wrong in my antenna chamber.
If you get very close to an antenna, the simple formulas in the antenna near field don't work. Hence, beware if for exampley you want results from 0.1" to 1" from an antenna that's radiating at a wavelength of 4 inches.

kch

RE: isotropic radiation patter equation

This is all a bit backwards. If you radiate 1W isotropically you get 1W spread over the sphere at all distances. That's it.

You had it in your first equation for TxP, although that formula gives power flux density at a distance from the antenna (watts per metre squared).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources