×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Subassembly Hierarchy

Subassembly Hierarchy

Subassembly Hierarchy

(OP)
I have a ton of components that seem like good candidates for sub-assemblies. Some of the sub-assemblies could actually be inserted into other sub-assemblies to make nested sub-assemblies. The nested sub-assembly would then be inserted into the main assembly. Does this sound like the best approach? or should I insert all of the sub-assemblies into the main assembly at one level? I think using nested sub-assemblies might give me the most control when using configurations showing positional changes of components. I have heard others say the best practice is to insert all of the screws at the main assembly. But if I have nested sub-assemblies wouldn't its screws be inserted at the sub-assembly level?

sorry if this is confusing.
Tom

Tom Malinski
Sr Design Engineer
OKay Industries
New Britain CT

RE: Subassembly Hierarchy

Assemblies and sub-assemblies should reflect the actual methods of manufacture, assembly or storage. If a sub-assy is built and/or stored as a separate process and part number than other sub-assys and top level assy, then that is the way it should be modelled.

cheers

RE: Subassembly Hierarchy

I do the nested form all the time--with the requisite hardware/fasteners.  (If it's a subassembly, it's a subassembly--fasteners are needed.)

I like to keep my top-level assembly light-weight, uncluttered, and agile.  Few mates means few problems.  Plus, this sort of thing is simpler to animate, depending on the complexity of the motion you need.

Jeff Mowry
www.industrialdesignhaus.com
Reason trumps all.  And awe transcends reason.

RE: Subassembly Hierarchy

(OP)
Thanks Jeff, thats what I Thought

CBL In my case, I'm working on tooling die components and assemblies that are all part of one P/N. The tool is one of a kind, but is mage up of many sub-assemblies and components.

Tom Malinski
Sr Design Engineer
OKay Industries
New Britain CT

RE: Subassembly Hierarchy

Tom,

I use sub assemblies all the time in my dies.

Makes it easier to manage the die.

Keeps things modular for easy re-use and cloning, etc.

Makes it easier to send out partial releases when doing concurrent design.

Keeps the top level clean and the top level mate count lower.

Probably lots more things I am not thinking about at the moment.

I also organize my stuff into folders within the top level asm.

Feature driven patterns are your friend when used with hole wizard holes.

The old concept of having all the details in one top level asm for the BOM are just that, old concepts.  Same goes for having all the die asm details in one multi-sheet drawing file.

Regards,

Anna Wood
SW 2007 SP2.2, WinXP
Dell Precision 380, Pentium D940, 4 Gigs RAM, FX3450
http://designsmarter.typepad.com/solidmuse
http://www.phxswug.com

RE: Subassembly Hierarchy

Tom,

Something else to consider is whether you will be inserting any flexible sub-assemblies.  They are only flexible one level up.

I myself prefer not to use sub-assemblies unless there is a good reason to (re-use, limit top level mates to under 300).  The more sub-assemblies you have, the more models to manage.  If you start making configurations and each sub-assembly has a configuration to match, then you increase the amount you have to manage.

One final thought fpor right now: sub-assemblies can also cause problems with making exploded views and auto-spacing.

SA

RE: Subassembly Hierarchy

(OP)
Thanks for your help, I'm leaning towards multiple sub-assemblies as our standard. I like the way they work for the most part and managing configurations seems to be a small price to pay for the organization and other benefits gained. I also don't often use flexible sub-assemblies any more.

Thanks
Tom..

Tom Malinski
Sr Design Engineer
OKay Industries
New Britain CT

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources