×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mononpole cross-section and Seismic/Wind issues
2

Mononpole cross-section and Seismic/Wind issues

Mononpole cross-section and Seismic/Wind issues

(OP)
I would like to know where I can find design information on seismic/wind issues with regard to tower
installation inside/on top of existing buildings.  
Also why monopoles are chosen to have certain type(s) of cross-section (18 sided, 16 sided) to prevent cross-wind excitation.
Any help in the right direction would be most helpful.
Thanks

RE: Mononpole cross-section and Seismic/Wind issues

adurbin,

For wind/seismic loads on structures on top of buildings I would use ASCE 7 "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures", a publication of the American Society of Civil Engineers.  Or, the applicable Building Code.

I may be wrong, but I think the number of sides on the cross-section of monopoles has to do with the manufacturing process.   All poles, polygonal or cylindrical section, may be subject to cross-wind excitations if the conditions producing these vibrations (wind velocity, pole height and natural frequency, etc.) exist.

AEF

RE: Mononpole cross-section and Seismic/Wind issues

2
I am in the process of designing a 66m high tower to go on a 50 storey building, so I hope I know what I am talking about.

Design wind loads will come from your local building codes. Usually these give you wind speeds at differing heights above ground. The drag of the different forms of tower will also be in the Code. If you don't have a local code, then I suggest John Holmes "Wind Loading of Structures".

Earthquake should not govern for a tower on top of a building. The building acts to isolate the tower from the ground vibrations. Also, a tower usually has a low natural frequency which reduces the magnitude of earthquake forces.

Tapered cylindrical poles are sometimes made with 8 or 12 flat sides, simply for ease of fabrication. Note that the drag coefficient of a octagon is about 1.3. A smooth circular cylinder has a drag coefficient of 1.2 at low Reynolds Numbers, but this reduces to 0.6 at higher Re. The typical tower on a building will have the lower figure.

Long cylindrical members or polygons are susceptable to wind-excited vibration. This comes from vortex shedding. The vibration will become unstable if there isn't sufficient damping in the structure.

The frequency of vortex shedding can be upset by adding spiral rings to the tower. A 16mm fibre rope wrapped round a 250mm light post works quite well. Another way of upsetting the vortex shedding frequency is to have a large bank of lights at the top of the tower. For this reason, tall posts for illuminating football fields do not need damping.

The alternative to upsetting the rhythm of vortex shedding is to provide a damper. A relatively cheap damper, such as a tuned chain in a tube, will provide over 2% damping and solve vibration problems for the average tower.

The stiffness requirement for the tower is not well defined in Building Codes. If the tower is to carry microwave antennas, there will be a servicability requirement for the rotation of the antenna. This ensures the transmitting antenna points at the receiver up to (say) the 6-year return wind gust.

Russell Keays

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources