×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Suitcase wind tunnel

Suitcase wind tunnel

Suitcase wind tunnel

(OP)
I think I need a wind tunnel to test modifictions on ducted fans for model propulsion. First thought was a tunnel with 10 inch diameter test section, 20 inch diameter upstream, giving a 4:1 area ratio. Velocity desired is 50 mph. Grinding through the design gave a beast over 50 inches high, 20 inches thick and over 90 inches long. Then, thinking of ways to reduce size and complexity, I tried a design with NO area ratio. Constant duct diameter of 10 inches.

This is FAR simpler! The four corners are all alike. No tapering tubes. Even with advanced Collar type turning vanes, complexity is within the reach of a reasonable home shop. Dimensions decreased to suitcase size: 10 wide X 26 high X 42 long. Estimated power required is quite reasonable.

QUESTION: What problems am I creating by not having a large diameter upstream of the test section?

RE: Suitcase wind tunnel

insideman (Mechanical)
The biggest problem I see, is that you are going to have a wide turbulent boundary layer in your test area, limiting the section you can actually use.
B.E.

To the optimist, the glass is half full. To the pessimist, the glass is half empty. To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

RE: Suitcase wind tunnel

(OP)
Thanks Berkshire. Can you elaborate please?

RE: Suitcase wind tunnel

In a parallel duct, particularly downstream of an elbow, the duct has vortices's  generated by the elbow, even with turning vanes which reduce the size of, but do not eliminate the vortices's. You want a parallel stream of air at the site of your test article I believe.
 The purpose of the larger area up stream is to first slow the air down, then to re accelerate it in a compressive flow to reduce the thickness of that turbulent boundary layer. Some tunnels use a diffuser grid at the point of slowest speed to re distribute the air to eliminate this turbulence.
B.E.

To the optimist, the glass is half full. To the pessimist, the glass is half empty. To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources