×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

REFINERY VESSELS LIGHTNING PROTECTION

REFINERY VESSELS LIGHTNING PROTECTION

REFINERY VESSELS LIGHTNING PROTECTION

(OP)
I posted this in the NFPA forum and no one replied!  Any takers here?

Vessels in a refinery which are tall and slim are usually not required to have lightning protection since they are constructed of metal of at least 3/16" in thickness and are electrically conductive.  However, what if the vessel is covered with insulation, say 150mm in thickness, top to bottom.  Normally the cladding that covers the insulation is only 14ga and not electrically continous.  NFPA 780 is not specific as to whether it should be protected. Does anyone know?  

 

RE: REFINERY VESSELS LIGHTNING PROTECTION

I don't think there's a 'right' answer to this question. The cladding (and underlying insulation) could be damaged by a strike. If the insulation is flammable, conductive or contains water, it could explode. I would also be concerned about flashover between the cladding and tank body unless they are made electrically continuous.

Does your insurance carrier have an opinion?

RE: REFINERY VESSELS LIGHTNING PROTECTION

duki,

When we talk about lightning srikes we need to consider two issues. That is Direct strokes and Indirect strokes.

Direct strokes: By the design itself of these tall metalic vessels (columns/ reactors), they will easily conduct the lightning current to the ground. Mostly a direct stroke will leave scars/ damages at the point of strike. It is true for a floating roof tank too.

Indirect strikes: Since these vessels (columns/ reactors), are tall they are not subjected to indirect strikes due to bound charges (unless it is a floating roof tank which is having a large surface area). Only there may be damages to instrumentation/ electronic equipments installed on the vessel due to transferred potential issue/ improper grounding etc.

Therefore, in my opinion the insulating cover does not play any role in lightning strikes to these vessels.

Hope this helps

Kiri

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources