×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Suggestions for Mechanical Linkage Improvement

Suggestions for Mechanical Linkage Improvement

Suggestions for Mechanical Linkage Improvement

(OP)
I am currently working on a slow moving (15mph max) off highway vehicle that has a tandem pump directly coupled to the engine.  There are two operator control levers connected to the pump via mechanical linkage.  Each lever controls the speed and rotational direction of a hydraulic wheel motor.

I am trying to eliminate/reduce vibration transmitted from the pump/engine to the control levers, while limiting the amount of "dead" or “lost” motion while actuating the levers.  Here are some of the suggestions or prototypes I have recommended to the customer.

1) vibration dampening rod ends
     - did not effectively dampen vibration,
       introduced excessive “lost” motion
2) “steer-by-wire” servo-motor actuation
     - too expensive
     - customer prefers simpler solution
3) push-pull cables
     - eliminated vibration effectively,
       high quality cable had minimal lost motion
     - customer has previously had “bad” experience,
       says $15 per cable is too high for    production
4) dual bell crank mechanical linkage
     - reduced vibration, lower cost than cables,
     - complicated assembly, excessive lost motion

OK, can anyone come up with any other solutions?  I prefer the push-pull cables if I can prove their merit to the customer.  Any info or ideas will be appreciated!

RE: Suggestions for Mechanical Linkage Improvement

ETBISME,

I do not know if the current linkage setup is steel rods, or stamped parts, or what have you.  If the design consists of stamped or tubular pieces, you should consider using laminated steel. A major US pickup truck manufacturer has run commercials touting "quiet steel."  Same stuff.  I have seen this used in an off-highway application to reduce vibration transmitted into a component mounting box with tremendous success.

Along that same thought path, golf club shaft makers have had vibration dampening steel shafts for many years.  They either coat the I.D. of the tubular shaft with an elastomer, or install tightly fitted plastic inserts into the I.D.'s..

 

 

-Tony Staples
www.tscombustion.com

RE: Suggestions for Mechanical Linkage Improvement


I too would push for cable control. The $15 concern could be valid but cable control is incredibly popular for that very application, and not particularly because of costs.

RE: Suggestions for Mechanical Linkage Improvement

Cables have the benefit of easier control layout. You don't need direct line of sight. You might also have the potential for more subassembly off of the main line. You can get good push/pull cables for the off-road industry, you just get what you pay for.

As to your original question if possible I would look at some of the big name skid steer makers for inspiration. There have been numerous ideas tried throughout the years so the latest designs should be fairly mature.

You also didn't describe the vibration in much detail. One source would be vibration in the chassis going through the cab and control lever. I don't think this is your concern but it could be adding to the problem depending on the operator platform/cab isolation or lack there of. I assume your main problem is vibration coming through the linkage from the motors. One idea that I haven't seen before is a tuned spring/mass damper on the linkage. It would need to be a set of tuned weights and springs sliding on the linkage axis.

I also realized that one version you didn't mention was hydraulic pilot control. It is very robust and should be cheaper than drive-by-wire but probably more than cables. It is also easy for service people to deal with - easier to understand than "smoke in the wires." Depending on the size of your pumps you could probably directly control the servo cylinders in the pumps.

Another idea would be to have vibration dampened lever pivots.

And of course there is the old stand-by - large "spongy" control grips.

ISZ

RE: Suggestions for Mechanical Linkage Improvement

I always favor bell cranks and just finished a design where a bell crank system expanded a 4 segment pie section to increase the diameter with ....no lost motion..

I often wonder but haven't tried it yet if you could dampen vibration with magnets pulling (but not in contact) in a canceling direction...

Cheers

I don't know anything but the people that do.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources