×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

HalfPower Bandwidth method

HalfPower Bandwidth method

HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
Hello members,
I am working on shell emitted noise and I am required to optimise the noise considering damping (modal).
As a part of that, I need to determine damping ratios experimentally. The simulated first natural frequency of the structure is of 300Hz. Now, I need to know which experimental method is best suitable for finding damping ratio. I read Experimental decay method and HalfPowerBand Width method suits well for this purpose. I gathered some info on the test rigs used for finding Frequency response function (FRF). For this, speaker is used as the exciting device. FRF is determined as the ratio of Velocity over the point on the surface to the Sound Pressure Level at the same point but just below the inner surface of the structure. i.e FRF=Vel/SPL. Using this FRF, damping ratio is found using Half Power Band width method.
Friends, I am in need of much information about this test rig/method. If there is any other method of determing damping ratio, kindly let me know. Your help in this regard is highly appreciatable.
Regards

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

half power methd is probably the best in this case. Exponntial decay is rather rough and ready.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

Though it will only work if the modes are well separated in frequency (i.e. effectively single degree of freedom behaviour)

M

--
Dr Michael F Platten

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

Like one of the other gentlemen mentioned, half-power will only work if you don't have modes right on top of each other.  

For example, I have one specimen that has at least 5 frequencies between 5 Hz and 5.3 Hz.  Half-power and log decrement are both impossible for it.  

I have another specimen that has the first two frequencies of 7.8 Hz and 8.0 Hz and half-power works fine for it because it has a damping ratio of about 0.2% of critical, so the modes are well separated even though they're only 0.2 Hz apart.  Just gotta look at the FRF and make the judgment.  Log decrement fails on this one, though.

If it has modes right on top of each other, you'll have to try a tool like MEScope.

I always try log dec first if possible.  Plotting semi-log makes it very reliable and fast.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

Well, if the modal density is high then you just play suck it and see by some sort of least squares fit between the analytical and test FRFs. That's the way some of the older EMA software worked

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
Dear members,
I am very glad to receive your responses. I got some idea on the method to use. Can any one suggest on the test equipment which I explained before?
--Speaker as exciting source--
--FRF defined as the ratio of velocity just above the surface of the structure to the sound pressure level just below the inner surface of the structure keeping the location same for both parameters.
It would be highly appreciatable if any gentleman comments on this.
Regards

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

Another practical point - in vaguely homogenous systems the damping ratio for modes in a given small bandwidth will generally be similar. That's not always true for all systems- for instance you might have a small sub-system going off into resonance all on its merry own.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

You may run into problems using a speaker as an exciter;  you might find it difficult to judge what the sound pressure is at the surface of the test object unless you have a rather good anechoic room.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
If that's the case, is there any other better method of exciation in this case.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

A shaker. A hammer. A tight string and a pair of scissors.

But in some respects for this problem a speaker is a good choice, as it will excite the modes of most interest for radiated noise, all other things being equal.

BUT there is a problem, as it is exciting the structure in a very complex fashion (simultaneously, all over and inside the structure). That's not to say it won't work - I've certainly done acoustically excited modals quite succesfully.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
Hello 271828(Structural)
"
I have another specimen that has the first two frequencies of 7.8 Hz and 8.0 Hz and half-power works fine for it because it has a damping ratio of about 0.2% of critical, so the modes are well separated even though they're only 0.2 Hz apart."
Could you kindly explain about the figures you mentioned.
In what way 7.8 and 8.0Hz is related to 0.2% damping.
I am bit confused.
cheers

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

The FRF peaks are much taller and narrower if damping is low.  At 0.2% of critical, even two peaks at 7.8 Hz and 8.0 Hz are separated well enough so that half-power will still work great.  If damping was higher, then the right side of the 7.8 Hz FRF peak would be on top of the left side of the 8.0 Hz peak, making a half-power estimate dubious.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
Thank you very much for immediate response..
It's very clear about the methodology and its usage limits.
Now, I have one more question regarding the test rig which I am going to use.
Test rig consists of SPEAKER as an harmonic excitor. Can I replace the conventially used hammer/shaker with the speaker keeping the rest same (transducers,analyzers etc..).
Being a fresher in this test, I am not aware of the test methodology.
Can we get multiple modes in single excitation? If so, how should be the input?

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

If all you want is natural frequencies and damping, then yes you can use the speaker with the same instrumentation. In fact you could get away without the microphone and just use the voltage across the speaker as the excitation reference (provided the dynamic electrical impedance of the speaker varies smoothly across your frequency range - it probably will).

HOWEVER, your speaker must be a good approximation to a the point load that a hammer or shaker would provide. I have done this on large flat structures with a 125mm diameter speaker. The speaker was positioned less than 10mm from the surface of the structure. This only gave useful info for the first dozen modes or so where the "wavelength" of each mode was large compared with the speaker. If this is not the case for your application then you could still use a speaker but you would have to switch to some form of "operational modal analysis"

M

--
Dr Michael F Platten

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

Yes I agree with previous post.  It will be ok for operational deflection shapes & the damping for these but getting an FRF will be harder due to difficulty in measuring input accurately.  Must keep it concentrated on a small area.  
I would try the shaker as well in your relevant freq range.  Just because end result is acoustic does not mean it is necessary to use sound as exciting source.  You can use the sound source later to check the modal frequencies.

    

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
Thanks to one and all for their valuable suggestions. I will get back if I face any difficulties during experimentation.
Before that, I would like to know
---any method of selecting points over the structure. ( random or any mathematical method etc..)
---number of points required to get better values.

regards

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

No, random is not a good approach, unless you are doing SEA, which I don't think you are.

You need to pick up all the mode shapes in the frequency range of interest wihout spatial aliasing.

You need to select locations that are of interest.

You need to select locations that are not unduly sensitive to accelerometer mass.

You need to select locations that can be used for correlation with an FEA model.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
Hello GregLocock,
Thanks for the response.
I am a newbie to all this stuff. I need some elaborate explanation on this. Can you suggest any relevant literature regarding this.
regards

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

(OP)
Hello Members,
Can any one comment on the test rigs which I would like to use for my present project.
File is loaded in rapidshare.com and is available at
http://rapidshare.com/files/20851929/Test_Rigs.doc
Regards,

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

No, sorry. Try Ewins, I don't have a copy, but he probably discusses it. Or the B&K Modal analysis books.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: HalfPower Bandwidth method

If you are lucky enough to have access to IADS software, tools for pretty much all of the methods described here are built in and user friendly. I know we're not supposed to self-promote here, but I think I'm mostly offering solid technical advice. The LogDec (and other similar), HPD for PSD/Autospectrum and FRF, CE and RFP Curve fits (for MDOF) are all in there, and learning-curve time is short.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources