×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

(OP)
Hi Group -

I'm trying to predict rolling fatigue life for cast low carbon steel of about 165 BHN, and at relatively low cycles (~10^5). Most of the work I've found on the subject of rolling fatigue seems to be oriented towards bearing design, with a sprinkling of work on cams and gears, so all the test data and contact life models I've found are more relevent to surface conditions of 450 BHN+, and much higher cycles (10^8+).  Some work has been done for railway & crane wheel/rail design - materials are closer, but my application (wheeled vertical spillway gate) is much higher loading & lower cycles.

I've done a fair bit of literature review but haven't come up with much (Tallian, Lundberg/Palmgren, a few handbooks on the subject, AGMA standards, etc.) Just wondering if anyone might have an idea or two about how to approach this...

David G.
Vancouver, BC

RE: Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

What are the values of contact stress for these components?  I find it difficult to believe that this application can be successful with contact stresses that are much higher than the 2-5 GPa that are routinely seen with roller bearings, etc.

RE: Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

(OP)
The contact stress is about 1.5 GPa.  I did manage a life calculation based on data I found for AISI 1030 at 10^8 cycles, and adjusting via log-log relation for the contact stress of interest, but that isn't a very convincing calculation.  Had to assume S-N curve slope, question about failure mode differences, etc.  10^3 is a reasonable life based on our limited experience with this application, but we need to do a bit better than that given that it is a very "high consequence" application.

RE: Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

In addition to hardness and exotic heat treatment (for great tensile and fatigue strength) It takes immaculate steel, precise geometry and great lubrication to make the rolling bearings work despite the traditionally miserable combination of similar materials.  Often it is not so much subsurface "fatigue" as surface destruction that starts as micro surface distress.  I picture any cast steel is as full of inclusions and junk to resemble a sponge.

Can you get dissimilar materials and some form of lube in there?

RE: Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

Can the application be scaled down to accommodate a small scale test?  Something that might at least give an indication of order of magnitude durability?

RE: Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

(OP)
Tmoose/mewhq:  thanks for your comments.  More about what we're actually doing - it's essentially a like-for-like replacement of existing cast steel wheels, of similar hardness, which have lasted for over 60 years without any indication of fatigue failure (corrosion is another matter).  Despite this strong evidence that the design contact stresses are not excessive, our client is requesting that we review the existing design in light of modern standards & design practice.  I'm just about at the point of concluding that there really isn't any such thing, except for some very rough guidlines that are published by USACE and a few hydroelectric authorities.  I my view this is a pretty futile exercise, but our client is a conservative bunch.

Tmoose, the wheel path is actually about 230+ BHN, so there seems to be a good difference between the two contact surfaces.  So, further hardening of the wheels would make the two surfaces even more similar, which might not really be an improvement.  Lubrication is problematic, mainly because the location is within a fish-bearing waterway.

RE: Mild Steel Rolling/Surface Fatigue

Like materials" was meant as steel-on-steel. There are mighty few steel-on-steel bearings in your car's engine, and the few that exist generally have gorgeous lubrication.
As near as I can tell playing with hardness to get for longer life is betting dollars to win pennies compared to lubrication.

Some plastics think water is lube.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources