×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Paralleling Substation Transformers

Paralleling Substation Transformers

Paralleling Substation Transformers

(OP)
Problem:
Have 1 existing 18 MVA (ONAN), 132:13.2kV (nominal), z = 8%, OLTC = 21 steps ±10% dy1 transformer.  To supply the load, this transformer will have to be paralleled with a new transformer.  The existing parallel scheme used is a "master-follower" arrangement.  Typically, we order transformers rated for 138kV (nominal) because that is the common supply voltage on our transmission system.  Also common is an OLTC = 33 steps ±10%.  I need help understanding what the specs of the new transformer should be.  

The best solution would be to have a transformer that will work for this installation, while still being able to be used elsewhere in the system (following the common specs above).  I am concerned that these are opposing criteria I have laid out, making a solution difficult.  

Any insight would be helpful.  Or, any idea on transformer application reference guides that may address this issue would also be appreciated.

TIA,
Pete

RE: Paralleling Substation Transformers

I suggest reading Beckwith Application Notes AN #11: Introduction to Paralleling of LTC Transformers by the Circulating Current Method  http://www.beckwithelectric.com/infoctr/appnotes/App11.pdf and AN #13: Advanced Paralleling of LTC Transformers by the Circulating Current Method  http://www.beckwithelectric.com/infoctr/appnotes/App13.pdf for a comprehensive explanation of the subject.

The first assumes the ideal case of two or more transformers of equivalent turns ratios and impedances.  The second deals with complications that arise when this is not the case.  If it is not the case, there will be circulating currents and the problem is to minimize them.

RE: Paralleling Substation Transformers

I'd ask Beckwith (or whoever supplies your parallel balancing control) how they handle two parallel LTC's with different step percentages.  Many controls simply keep LTC's with the same step percentages within one step of each other thus minimizing circulating currents (assuming you've done your homework regarding no-load taps and impedances).  At 10 steps = 10% on the existing unit a 5/8% step on tap 9 (one step off) would have 5.625% or a gap of approx. 4.4% and there it would sit - high circulating currents.  I've had opportunity to set units with 2:1 load capacity to run in parallel but the LTC's had the same 5/8% step increment.  I also assume you will specify an impedance so your downstream equipment can handle the fault current resulting from the parallel combination or do your common specs preclude this?  You might need to program a PLC for the parallel-balance vs. an off-the-shelf control.

RE: Paralleling Substation Transformers

(OP)
Thanks, as additional background, the existing unit actually had a sister unit which it operated in parallel with.  This unit has failed, and so we are in the process of replacing it with a new one.  I do not believe that the fault current will vary much, since this project is a replacement project.  

I have looked at the Beckwith application notes, but found that they are in reference to the circulating method.  The paralleling scheme we are implementing is a simple master / follower (ie. Master A raises, therefore Follower B raises; Master A lowers, therefore Follower B lowers).  It seems that if a "mis-stepped" replacement transformer is ordered, we would need to revise this scheme (perhaps to the circulating current method).

RE: Paralleling Substation Transformers

I don't see how a master/follower scheme would work with dissimilar tap voltages.  I guess that if there are taps close enough together that circulating currents would be acceptable, a PLC could be used to to restrict the taps to certain particular combinations.  I'm not sure that this would work for all possible loads and voltages.

The best solution would be to purchase a replacement transformer with the same impedance and taps.

RE: Paralleling Substation Transformers

Hi duh
For your existing tap control scheme to work you need identical transformers ie rating, number of taps & impeadance. If this criteria is not met you will be faced with large ciculating currents.
If you install a different spec transformer and the %v/tap & impeadance are not too disimilar to your existing transformer you may get away with it as long as you change the control scheme.
Supertapp or microtapp relays from siemens ex vatech/reyolle will do the job

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources