×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

(OP)
I'm looking in to converting a cross-plane V8 to a flat-plane.  Specifically, the Toyota/Lexus 1UZ.  I understand the basics of difference between the two configurations but was looking for recommendations on engineering the balance shaft(s).

I have the CAD/CAM, engineering and machining/welding capabilities but need to figure out those balance shafts.  Anyone know of any texts that cover the secondary vibration characteristics of flat-plane V8's?  Or perhaps someone knows the specs on the bottom end of Lotus' Espirit, Ferrari's Modena or the TVRs?

I've got a couple of friends that can handle the ECU, ignition and fuel injection but would cherish any advice you folks may have....

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

I'm surprised that anyone would bother putting balance shafts in a V8, and given that they apparently did, I wonder what imbalance they were trying to offset.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane


Are you sure the existing system is robust enough for the increased duty?

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

Flat crank v-8 has big secondary imbalance like a pair of inline 4s. The vibration is one of the things for whichg the NOVI V-8 engine was famous

Since the secondary imabalance is along the  cylinder axis you >>might<< need a pair of 2x encrank speed counter-rotating balance shafts for each bank.  Serious complication to simplify exhaust manifolding

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

(OP)
MikeHalloran -- Flat-plane V8s are essentially like two inline 4's mated together, on a crank with no counterbalance weights.  Therefore there is a secondary vibration similar to an I4, although the components of the imbalance from each bank negate each other....

Fabrico -- based on the Toyota Supra's block being capable of +1000 HP I'm GUESSING this block should handle it.  Do you think perhaps the crank bearings won't have the area necessary to resist the unbalanced forces?

Tmoose -- I'm not really after the simplified exhaust... more along the lines of the decreased rotational mass (throttle response), the oh-so-beautiful sound and for sheer uniqueness...

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

I understand what a flat-crank V8 is.  Did I understand correctly that the Toyota/Lexus V8, presumably not a flat-crank design, has balance shafts anyway?

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

(OP)
No, it has no balance shafts.  I'm planning on welding in what I need, re-heat treating the block and then machining.  My two business partners are ex-race machinists.  I'll be doing a good bit to this block anyway - replacing the head gasket with  compression rings, mating a 6-speed Porsche tranny, etc. - so I thought I might try the flat-plane conversion.  I've got the time and tools; just need the theory.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

It seems like a lot of work, weight, complexity and power loss just to reduce vibration.  How about some soft motor mounts instead?



Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

I wouldn't bother either. There's a million flat plane cranks out there and I have never seen balancer shafts used.  Since they don't reduce the bearing loads they can't improve reliability much.

First you need to work out your effective forcing function. Then you need to design eccentric masses to give the same forcing function.

All the equations are in Theory of Machines and Mechanisms by Shigley and Ucker, or you can do it from first principles.

Then you need to figure out where to put them.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

Greetings,theonlynamenottaken,

You should have used, "theonlyroadnottaken."  Your project, your money; however, of all the possible modifications one could make to that engine, a 180-degree crankshaft with balance shafts is the greatest investment of time and effort for the least return I can imagine.  It will be unique.

Keep us posted as you work through the project.

thnx, jv.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

On a technical note, the V-8 engine use shared rod journals on the crank.  A flat plane crank would change the camshaft valve sequencing and firing intervals too.

If you were to take a four position standard V-8 crankshaft and change it to a 180 degree two position crank, you would introduce uneven firing impulses (instead of one every 90 degrees).  Hmm, it seems to me you would be introducing more vibration than you are trying to eliminate.

Somewhere, there would be 4 cylinders with 180 degrees firing impulses, followed by 4 others.  I visualize a master/slave cylinder relationship.

I can think of better ways to spend a couple of hundred grand, and you would get more power and a better sounding exhaust with exhuast tuning.

Franz

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

got to ask the question why do you wish to change to flat plan crank

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

My understanding was that the principle advantage of a flat plane V8 crank was the ease of forging compared to a cruciform design.  Racing engines design requiring a forged material rather than a cast crank then tended to be flat crank engines.  

The racing engines were not as constrained by 1)the need for better balance and 2) the better fuel distribution that a dual plane intake manifold provides with a central carburetor mount.

The availability of independant fuel injectors solved the latter problem and your no holds barred approach to cost should permit you to whittle a strong crank from a big chunk of sturdy steel.

Sound? You want sound? Take the savings and make a downpayment on a P51.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

If anyone cares to follow the link posted by amorrison4, that kind of says it all.

Flat plane crank is lighter, so more performance while accelerating as there is less inertia to overcome, and it changes the firing order so that each bank fires like a normal 4 cylinder at 180 degree increments, instead of a pair at 90 degree like a cuneiform crank.

This allows for an exhaust system that is more efficient without a need to cross pipes from one side of the engine to the other.

It also means that a dual plane manifold will have a left and right hand plane rather than a top and bottom plane.

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

Quote:

My understanding was that the principle advantage of a flat plane V8 crank was the ease of forging compared to a cruciform design.  Racing engines design requiring a forged material rather than a cast crank then tended to be flat crank engines.
Things have been taken the other way too. There have been sucessful racers that stretched rules to the max by making flat plane cranks out of qualifying standard OEM cranks. New wording ended the practice.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

Seems like there was a drag racer back in the old 70's A/FX days that ran 180 cranks in his cars ( Dick Landy?? Dodge Hemi??) The benefit was efficent exaust scavanging and intake tuning. As I recall it Literally shook pieces off the car on every run. The increased power was offset by much increased maintenance bettween runs.

regards, Steve

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

theonlynamenottaken,
i am going to put a flat plane crank in a 3uz.
i am going to use a balancer from a company in san diego. it is not a secondary balance shaft but a balancer to put onto the crank out front. looked for a balance shaft, couldn't find one for this engine or one to adapt to this engine. ferrari uses one. i'll look up the company, can't remember the name. would love to have a balancer shaft though.
wes

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

That's a harmonic damper (or TV damper). It won't really help much with the roughness of a flat plane crank, but I don't think you got to a flat plane crank if you want refinement. The thing will live, that is your primary concern.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

If a carbureted motor shakes enough it won't run very well, even if the crank and block don't care.

A well respected balance shop balanced a race shop's  enlarged by stroking 4 cylinder Opel motor.  It shook so violently the intake manifold would not stay on.  Settled out of court.  Really the balance shop was blameless.  Vibration analysis would almost certainly have revealed the heavy vibration was at 2X rotation, not 1X (where "balancing" can help).
The secondary vibration was made worse if the cranks was "stroked" and original length rods were used. Heavy pistons aggavate secondary imbalance too.

RE: Converting a Cross-Plane V8 to Flat-Plane

i dont know if your still into this, but i have been looking like crazy for and been researching flat plane V8's.  and no, the sound can not be produced any other way, except with a quad rotor wankle.
It probably would be easier and cheaper to find a engine that is already made that way, but if you want to convert and need balance shaft calculations, this site is for you:
http://www.dinamoto.it/DINAMOTO/on-line%20papers/twin%20motors/twin.html

you may have to do some modifications to the formula, because it is for v-twins, but the shafts will act the same. they will have to be proportionate to the weight, sit opposite to each other one the same plane as the crank, and spin in the opposite direction twice as fast as the crank. its pretty simple once you see it in action.  the moto guzzi is the one that has a flat plane design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources