×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

304 vs 316 for below waterline marine applications on boats

304 vs 316 for below waterline marine applications on boats

304 vs 316 for below waterline marine applications on boats

(OP)
We are very cautiously investigating a switch from 316ss to 304ss on less critical below waterline marine hardware applications where some corrosion could be tolerated over a 10-20 year service life.  The applications would mainly be skegs and rudder blades fabricated by welding waterjet cut plate.  All the rudders would still have nautiloy or aquamet shafting only the plates are being considered for 304.  Everything is bonded and fitted with sacrificial zinc.

Anyone made a first hand comparison between the two alloys in applications like this?  Did the change shorten the usefull life of the parts or were they still being replaced at the same inteveral for other reasons?

The main reason for the switch is that 304 is available more consistently.

RE: 304 vs 316 for below waterline marine applications on boats

I presume that you are trying to save money?  Look at lean duplex grades, Outokumpu LDX2101 and Allegheny AL2003.  They have as good or better pitting resistance than 316L, they are much stronger (make thinner), and they cost less.
I see 304 as taking a risk for this application.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: 304 vs 316 for below waterline marine applications on boats

(OP)
Thank you both.  Helpful articles.

How are the duplex alloys for welding?  Do they still require low carbon welding rod?  Do they behave predictably between physical test and FEA models?

-Eric

RE: 304 vs 316 for below waterline marine applications on boats

Yes, you need low carbon filler any time you are welding ot stainless.
There are special weld rod grades for welding duplex-to-duplex.  If you are welding duplex to austenitic stainless then 309L would be the preferred filler.
The Outokumpu web site (is difficult to navigate) has some great welding guides on it.
These grades have been used extensivly for structures and equipment.  The properties are predictable.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: 304 vs 316 for below waterline marine applications on boats

(OP)
You have all been very helpful.  Thank you.

-Eric

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources