×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

FCAW for vessel welding

FCAW for vessel welding

FCAW for vessel welding

(OP)
Good day,

I have heard welding engineers say they don't want FCAW for welding pressure seams when the MDMT is -40°C.  In fact they don't recommend FCAW for pressure seams, period.  

From my research, I can only gather that one might not want to use FCAW process most likely is because of the possiblity of incomplete fusion as a result of the fast fill rate of FCAW.  Other than that, I don't see why FCAW is not acceptable.   Can anyone shed some more light on this subject or pass on a link to some resource so I can bone up on it?  
Thanks in advance.

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

The concern is toughness of the weld metal. As with nay high deposition process you have rather coarse grained, columnar microstructures that can wreak havoc on toughness. There are heat treatments, such as normalization and normalize and temper to improve toughness. However, the heat treatments are more expensive in comparison to subcritical post weld heat treatment.

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

(OP)
metengr,

Thanks for your input.  I think you pointed out the key point.  

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

I'd like to add that certain wires come prequalified by AWS with impacts at -40F, eg. those classified as E7xT-9J.  I'm a firm believer that everything has its place, and while not a panacea, FCAW is a viable process for many applications within the pressure vessel manufacturing industry.  I find there is still some resistance in some companies to allow it, however, in several cases we have been successful in swaying the opinion, by showing the client certain advatages to the FCAW process.  In one case the customer required us to perform some fairly extensive testing including impacts which was all successful but for us the effort paid off because putting it bluntly, in many cases FCAW is a process superior to SMAW.
Just my opinion.  

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

weldtek;
I concur with your statement. Most of the misunderstanding related with FCAW is toughness, which you handled well in your post.

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

I got the same unfavorable opinions on FCAW in field vessel welding from our clients but there is no exact explaination.

Now from your guys' expert post, I learned a lot.
Thanks.

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

Don't forget that you will then also find prejudices between self shielded and gas shielded FCAW.  API RP 582 will help you further.

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.pdo.co.om/pdo/

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

(OP)
SJones,

Thanks for your input.  We use API RP582 as the basis for our welding standard.  It is an excellent welding standard that covered pretty much every thing that has to be said for welding pressure equipment.  You're right, it has some excellent limitations on FCAW.  However, as a non-specialist in welding, from what I have read I see that with carefull consumable material testing, limitation on hydrogen content, and limitation on travel speed, I don't see why we should not use FCAW for pressure seams more often.  Like Weldtech said, it is a viable process.  I am going to have to dig further to find out the history as to why welding people in our oil & gas industry do not like using FCAW on vessels. There must be some good reason for it.

Thanks all.

RE: FCAW for vessel welding

(OP)
I thought I would share some comments I got from our Chief QA Inspector on this issue.  Please read below an excerpt of discussion I was having with him.


It is one of those urban  legends-- sort of.  When I was with Amoco we had a pretty large welding/ research technology group and years ago they had issues with FCAW for use in sour service, but it was largely due to the segregation of the flux in the  the wire, not the process persay. They claimed that they had experienced instances of the alloying elements segregating which resulted in inconsistent mechanical properties, particularly with isolated hard spots. They claimed that they never had the same experiences with  SAW, even though both process can add alloying elements via the flux( They had some theory that the segregation happen in the wire itself after manufacture, which I personally really doubt)
 
About 10 years ago, Amoco removed any restrictions their welding specialists had with FCAW as they felt the manufacturing/ flux process issues had been resolved. I am not against the FCAW process and I think it can and should be used more. It is widely used in the most critical applications including nuclear/ submarines, etc.Like any  process, there needs to be good procedures,  trained welders, and adequate QC controls. if you manage those variables FCAW is fine.....



RE: FCAW for vessel welding

vesselguy,
Your Chief QC Inspector stated the facts succinctly.  I concur with his comments.  
I don't want to offend anyone but, I honestly believe that in many cases the people that are deciding which welding processes are acceptable for use on their jobs, are unqualified to do so.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources