CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
(OP)
I took the CSWP test and I was disappointed in the overall format. I have never used the default SW hotkeys so why would I know what hotkeys do what (multiple choice). Can you use the flex and deform commands on the same part? No idea, never used either one. Never got to the assembly or drawing parts because I spent a bunch of time on a SW provided model to fix and the model was corrupted, even the instructor could not fix it. I got the actual modeling parts perfect and the assy and drawing sections would not have been an issue if there would have been time to do them. Seems to me that the test should be two different tests. One directed toward someone who primarily does industrial design (consumer products) and one directed towards mechanical design (building machines). I have been using SW for over 3 years on a daily basis and can usually do whatever needs to be done without issues. I am a mechanical designer and will probably never change fields to building telephones and toilets. In fact, I think it would be a better description of your skills to be able to be certified in different fields of SW expertise (sheetmetal, molds/dies, weldments, mechanical design, industrial design, etc.) I believe that there are many people out there that have a very focused line of work and those people should be able to be certified for those fields. Some things do cross over, like assembly modeling and drawings. Those are things that would be common to all tests. The way it stands now is someone who has no idea how to make a weldment could easily pass the test if they know other aspects of SW.
Did I fail - Yep, I sure did ($300 bucks down the drain). Honestly I not complaining because I failed but now that I have taken it, I do not believe that it is a good meausre of someones SW actual skills. It's just too broad. Maybe there could also be a CSWPM (Certified Solidworks Professional Master) for those people who work with all the aspects and functionality of SW.
Comments welcome....
Did I fail - Yep, I sure did ($300 bucks down the drain). Honestly I not complaining because I failed but now that I have taken it, I do not believe that it is a good meausre of someones SW actual skills. It's just too broad. Maybe there could also be a CSWPM (Certified Solidworks Professional Master) for those people who work with all the aspects and functionality of SW.
Comments welcome....






RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
It’s not a waste of money because now you know what you need to learn next time if you decide to take it... I was the 2nd person in Indiana to get mine as a user. Now I not only still have my CSWP, but I also have my CSWST (Support Technician) and you think the CSWP is hard its double everything and you didn't get your choice of models you have to do them all and they have to correct without any mistakes or very few mistakes.
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP![[pc2] pc2](https://www.tipmaster.com/images/pc2.gif)
www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
I do agree that maybe there could be separate degrees of the exam. I suggest sending them your suggestion.
Chris
SolidWorks 06 5.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 02-10-07)
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
http://ww
Note training is emphasized.
There are free training files at
htt
I do not use animator, cosmos, surfaces, fastening features, mold tools, weldments, and many other tools. I wouldn't even take the test until I knew what was expected. $300 isn't a cheap lesson to learn.
SW07 SP2.0
Flores
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Having a CSWP is supposted to be a reassurance to the prospective employer that they are hiring someone with an advanced knowledge of solidworks and according to the SW website, this person should be able to walk into just about any typical design situation and handle it with ease. Well, if that situation is a weldment that CSWP might just sink like a rock because I do not remember 1 weldment question.
If a company that makes structural frames is looking to hire, they want to hire someone who knows weldments. They do not care if he can make a sheetmetal enclosure or if he knows the default SW hot key for toggeling the filters on and off. They could interview 10 CSWP's and maybe none know weldments and wasted everyones time. Now, if they interviewed 10 CSWWP's (Weldment Professionals) they would no doubt have 10 very qualified people for the job.
What makes more sense? Again, this is just my opinion but it seems to be a more accurate view of a persons SW skills if the exams were more industry specific. I thought this was the whole idea, an accurate reperesentation of skills.
I definatley will send the suggestion to SW.
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
You will never know until you start using them ... or any other function.
I think it is a good suggestion to turn in ... any suggestion from a user to SW is good for them.
It is good to know as much as possible of all aspects of SW. Just because there is the sheetmetal tools doesn't mean you have to be a sheetmetal designer. You can use the SM features for a lot of features in other designs. The same for other tools.
So, my suggestion, read up and take courses, then retake the exam. You will find that there is a lot you will learn that you wished you knew before.
Chris
SolidWorks 06 5.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 02-10-07)
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Sorry to hear about your CSWP experience.
But I do think Scott, Chris and The Tick make very good points.
When I wrote the CSWP, I found out which areas I needed to improve on.
You did mention having different levels of certification. FYI CATIA does something like this (they have Specialist and Expert levels):
http://w
Best wishes,
Joseph
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
1) general engineering content
2) discipline specific content
If SolidWorks wants to design and market their product to a wider field of customers, they should do the same with their form of certification.
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Sure he knew the software and could talk the talk, but that didn't cut it.
I know, different animal, but I don't put much faith in those test. My interview process now consit of walking out into the shop and the canidate has to tell me what he is looking at.
I can make time to show people things in the software that they may not have used before, but I don't have time to teach somebody how to be a designer.
Zuccus
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
None-the-less your opinion is your opinion, but you won't get sympathy from me, because a CSWP may not get me a job, might look good on a Resume, but like zuccus pointed out, if you don't know how to design, then what's the point of having a CSWP license... I guess its a good thing I can design then... or I would be screwed... and the cool thing is I have enough education that I can design using all the options in SW... it broadens my skills and allows more access to other job markets for me, besides just sheet metal or weldments... if the job requires some surfacing, imported files then hey I have a better chance then you at getting it, not because of my CSWP, but because I have had experience in it and use it more often.
Your right it's your Opinion and you can make your suggestions to SW, but don't complain about something that you should have researched more before dropping $300 dollars.
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP![[pc2] pc2](https://www.tipmaster.com/images/pc2.gif)
www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
SA
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Cole M
CSWP, CSWST, CSWI, CPDM
SW06
SW07
IBM T42p, 2g proc., 1g RAM,ATI Mobility Fire GL T2
HP XW4100, 3g proc., 3g RAM, Nvidia Quadro 980 XGL
HP XW4300, 3.4g proc, 2.5g RAM, ATI Fire GL 3100
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
WOW, nothing like getting bent out of shape. Maybe with your extensive SW knowledge you can use the flex and deform tool to straighten yourself out again. I am not sure how you misunderstood my intention here and I do not recall asking you for anything much less your sympathy.
I am not trying to offend anyone here but I see I have failed. This was supposed to be my opinion regarding an overview the the CSWP exam and how I feel it represents a persons actual skills.
At this time I am just saying that I think seperate tests would more closely represent a users true skills for the area of industry they are in, nothing more. The CSWP is probably great for those who have a broad knowledge of SW. However, that is not everyone.
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Actually mostly about the design side, but some on the Solidworks side also. Our company is making the transition from AutoCAD 2D to Solidworks, I partially hired him hoping that he would help guide us in the right direction. He was also not very good about interacting in a multiuser enviroment with any CAD package.
We choose to go with solidworks because of the strong weldment package (2/3 of our work) it has and the pipe routing (1/3 of our work) seemed to be ok. He had no idea how to use either despite his claims.
I am guessing that they don't test either of these on the CSWP exam. I could be wrong here.
Zuccus
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
You don't need extensive SW knowledge to use the flex and deform tools.
Chris
SolidWorks 06 5.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 02-10-07)
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
So who is the most knowledgeable CSWP...someone that past the test five years ago or someone that past it in 2006? I firmly believe in continued education or recertification. This is a requirement for a lot if not all fields that have some form of professional certification.
Best Regards,
Heckler
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SWx 2007 SP 2.0 & Pro/E 2001
Dell Precision 370
P4 3.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
XP Pro SP2.0
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
(In reference to David Beckham) "He can't kick with his left foot, he can't tackle, he can't head the ball and he doesn't score many goals. Apart from that, he'
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
The CSWP test gages your level of familiarity (not even mastery) with all areas of the program; it is not intended to concentrate on specific areas only. I think it is a good measure of a person’s familiarity with SolidWorks. I do not think it is an indicator of a person’s design skills, thought processes, or work experience.
I am not sure what lead you to believe that this test would not cover all areas of the program. Did you do any research into the CSWP exam before taking it? I know there are a few sample tests out there that provide good indications on what to expect when taking the CSWP.
I agree (to a point) that it would be nice to have more specific certifications available that were geared towards specific industries. The downside is that these specific certifications would do nothing but place limits on you as a perspective employee. Are you designing the same things you did 5yrs ago, 10yrs ago? When I see someone with a CSWP I see someone that has reached beyond their comfort zone to learn about all the capabilities of SW. It is something that I haven’t had the time, desire, or necessity to accomplish, but I respect it.
"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
You are complaining about the exam... that to me is a person that wants either sympathy or for everyone to agree. It's not going to happen, because there is too much gray area. I don't need to deform myself into anything... because I now voiced my opinion about this and you don't like... and I don't like yours... so see your not any better then. I choice my opinion that the CSWP exam is fine and if the break it out in specific groups that's their choice, but at this time its not if you don't like you know where to go... go complain to SW. But for now if you think the CSWP is that important you know what you have to study for next time.
We all have our opinions and you got mine twice... you don't have to agree with it either!
I am always expanding my knowledge of the software and the add-ins... with all the experience I get day in and day out I still have to get re-certified as a CSWST ever 2 years, but I think they changed that to 1 not sure at the moment. Supporting SW years ago was a piece of cake compared to today's standard. There are so many add-ins and stuff that comes standard with just standard SW that I have to keep up with it changing 2 times a year. Continually training is a necessary and should not be avoided. I am required when a Customer calls to know the answer well and you can't do that if you only knew a small portion of the software... yes I have been using the software since it came out in 95-96, but the changes compared to then would blow your mind if you could see it today. I know some of you remember the old SW.
Well TitaniumLeg that is my opinion about this CSWP and just because you didn't like the way they gave the test I don't think complaining about it here is going to really do much good. Because SW has done a lot for me and I have always protected it. So maybe I still have that chip, but it’s a great piece of software and I support it fully and have for the last 11 years. Now I do it as a job and get paid to help people with the software. Being on this site is what helped to understand the skill I have a problem solving and how much I enjoyed it. So good luck if you decide to take the test again... and as an Engineer hopefully next (if there is one) you will investigate your purchases better before making such a large commitment.
Best Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP![[pc2] pc2](https://www.tipmaster.com/images/pc2.gif)
www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
I knew there was a reason you were well liked here by the rest of us!
Chris
SolidWorks 06 5.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 02-10-07)
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
MadMango makes a great point
"I agree (to a point) that it would be nice to have more specific certifications available that were geared towards specific industries. The downside is that these specific certifications would do nothing but place limits on you as a perspective employee."
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
I think if you go through your VAR I think that's possible, but in all honesty I don't know for sure, because that's not my field here. If you contact your Sales Manager they can tell you for sure.
But if you do it on your own your not locked into it such a deal as far as I know. I know when I took mine, if I had failed it would have been $500 down the drain. You are required to get an 80% to pass. I managed to get by with a 90 I think and was the 2nd one to leave early form the 8 hours we are given to take the test.
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP![[pc2] pc2](https://www.tipmaster.com/images/pc2.gif)
www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
If you can, then I got screwed...sort of. I had to take the test twice to pass and had to pay both times. Granted, my second time I paid only a portion of the full price, but I did have to pay. Thankfully, I passed the second time even though I don't use all of the functionality in SW. As someone stated (Scott?), I'm just familiar with it. If you focus strictly on one aspect of SW, I think you're doing yourself a disservice. The more you know, the more valuable you become.
Jeff Mirisola, CSWP
CAD Administrator
SW '07 SP2.0, Dell M90, Intel 2 Duo Core, 2GB RAM, nVidia 2500M
http://designsmarter.typepad.com/jeffs_blog
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Fluid mechanics, heat transfer, dynamics, materials, machinery...a few other categories many of which I hadn't used in my career up to that point and some of which I STILL haven't used, but as a consultant, I better be prepared to use them if necessary.
How would you break out the exam so that it is still universally useful? Part modelers need to know assemblies. Sheet metal probably needs to know weldments. At best, I see two exams, so what's the point? If I'm SW, I don't make an exam that targets a specific industry...it's too expensive to build more than a few tests...especially considering the limited number of people that take it each year.
The CSWP is for the "best of the best" when it comes to using SW. SW doesn't care if that means they can't perform in a specific environment...their business is software!
[insert remaining rant here]
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
SW07 SP2.0
Flores
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
"Professional" just means you get paid for what you do.
I do hope to someday get my CSWU (user), if my company will pay for it.
Chris
SolidWorks 06 5.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 02-10-07)
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Thanks again for all of the input....:)
Side note for "TheTick"
Do you happen to play Battlefield 2142 online? There was someone on there the other night with the name "TheTick69"
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Good luck to you. When the time comes, please keep us posted on the outcome.
Chris
SolidWorks 06 5.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 02-10-07)
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Sometimes I go by "That70sTick" on usenet groups.
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Not a great win/loss or kill/death ratio, but I still play anyway.
SW07 SP2.0
Flores
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
To answer somebody's question about paying for the exam again. I know with my VAR they offer a one day prep course for something like $800 and this includes the test fee. If you take the prep couse and fail, you do not have to pay to retake the test again for something like a year.
This is part of their quarantee that you will pass the test by taking their course.
Now I am sure that they teach strictly for the test so your odds off passing are pretty good and I think you take the test the next day.
Nobody ever answered my questions if the weldments and routing were on the test. Titanium, maybe you can help me out on that one.
Zuccus
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
But from my experience, I have been involved with SolidWorks for about 4 years and my main duty where I work is to write the standards for using it and to teach people how to apply it. So basically I'm pretty much required to know the answer when asked a question about the software.
Taking the test was not the main forcus for me. I knew there were many areas that I did not know in SolidWorks so I worked my buns off for 3 months straight, putting in many hours to study the things I knew I didn't know. And to be perfectly honest, that was the best thing I could possibly have done. I've learned so much about the software in that short amount of time and I can honestly say that even though I didn't pass, I can still bring something back with me and help the people who I care about helping.
It was all a personal goal for me. At least I know that I had the passion and ability to study as hard as I did and retain what I learned to get myself to a level of knowledge that I wasn't even sure I could have. Passing was very important to me too but learning from this test was even more important and hopefully many others who take this test would see it that way as well, I agree...it was a huge learning experience. But everyone has their own goals so to each their own.
In all honesty, good luck with your retake. I will also be retaking it as soon as I can!
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
SMCADMAN - Sorry I do not know my K/D ratio at the moment. My handle is Body-Bagger and am currently a Sgt. Silver
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
You can take the CSWP exam at SolidWorks world for a much lower price (usually about $150). If you're a SW user group member you recieve a 25% discount on the test.
Rob Rodriguez CSWP
www.axiscadsolutions.com
www.robrodriguez.com
http://designsmarter.typepad.com/rob_rodriguez/
President: www.nvtswug.com
SW 2007 SP 2.0
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Cheers,
Ralph Wright, CSWP
SolidWorks 2005, SP5.0
Intel Pentium D, 3.2Ghz
2.0Gb RAM
nVidia Quadro Fx 1300 Card
Microsoft Windows XP Pro
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
Best Regards,
Heckler
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SWx 2007 SP 2.0 & Pro/E 2001
Dell Precision 370
P4 3.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
XP Pro SP2.0
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
(In reference to David Beckham) "He can't kick with his left foot, he can't tackle, he can't head the ball and he doesn't score many goals. Apart from that, he'
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
On a totally off-subject post ... what is your little figure supposed to be? And is your Beckham post supposed to cut off in mid-sentence?
Patricia Lougheed
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
(In reference to David Beckham) "He can't kick with his left foot, he can't tackle, he can't head the ball and he doesn't score many goals. Apart from that, he's all right." -- George Best
Best Regards,
Heckler
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SWx 2007 SP 2.0 & Pro/E 2001
Dell Precision 370
P4 3.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
XP Pro SP2.0
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
(In reference to David Beckham) "He can't kick with his left foot, he can't tackle, he can't head the ball and he doesn't score many goals. Apart from that, he'
RE: CSWP Test very off base in my opinion
<off-topic> Looks like you have overrun the max characters available for a sig, which I believe is around 250 </off-topic>
Good Luck
johnwm
________________________________________________________
To get the best from these forums read FAQ731-376 before posting
Steam Engine enthusiasts
Steam Engine Prints