×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

carbonate geology

carbonate geology

carbonate geology

(OP)
I am designing stormwater detention structures for a site with extensive carbonate geology.  It is evident because runoff from the entire 220+ acre drainage area passes through an existing 15" pipe without problem.  There are also some sinkholes on the site.  The problem I have is accounting for this carbonate geology in the stormwater runoff calculations.  I have used PSU IV for other projects but the minimum drainage area for that method is 1 sq. mile.  Any valid methods out there for accounting for carbonate geology when performing stormwater calculations?

RE: carbonate geology

a large part of hydrology requires applying "engineering judgement".  However, I would investigate what others have done in the past before just dreaming up some new loss coefficient.  You may find however, that the subject has been studied by others and subsequently accepted by the regulating agencies.  I would suggest you discuss this with your agency reviewer, indicating that you feel an adjustment of loss parameters is a reasonable approach and at least get some concurrence what an appropriate value of adjustment might be.  

RE: carbonate geology

You need to delineate your site into its various drainage basins.  I'd wager most of it drains to sinkholes and only a small section to the 15" pipe.  When you do your development, you'll use the normal hydrology methods to calculate your runoff and you need to make sure that your retention basins where your sinkholes are are large enough to hold the design storm volume.  

Plan to install Class V injection wells in each sinkhole to assist the water in draining and prevent spectacular fall-outs.  As the water percolates into the soil, it forms a vortex.  If that vortex isn't contained in a pipe, it is very erosive and can have some pretty dire consequences for any near-by structures.  Changing thet land use increases the amount of water draining to a sinkhole and this is when the sinkholes become unstable and fall out all over the place.

RE: carbonate geology

(OP)
cvg - Thanks for your response.  I have talked with several agencies, including the agency reviewer, and they did not suggest any accepted calculation methods for this situation.  This is part of my investigation to determine what others have done in the past instead of dreaming up a reduction factor.
francesa - Thanks for your response.  The pre-development drainage area totals 220+ acres which all drains to the existing 15" pipe. There are sinkholes on the site but none in the primary drainage course through the site.  Therefore it can be concluded that runoff does not necessarily enter the ground through visible sinkholes.  In fact there is a spring on the site which surfaces for a couple hundred feet of overland flow and then spreads out and disappears.  There is no visible sinkhole, it just percolates through the soil. I have delineated the site into several post-development drainage areas which all drain to detention basins.  The problem arises when I try to meet the pre-post flow reduction for this large area (much of which is not disturbed).
I am unable to create a reasonable pre-development model of the site which shows what runoff is doing on the site.  

RE: carbonate geology

The 1 sq mi min. is just an arbitrary number PennDOT uses.  If it is not a PennDOT job, you can use it, although 220 acres (less than 0.5 sqw mi) is pretty small for a regression model.  Section 5 of PSU IV allows correcting output less than 1.5 sq miles, by PennDOT rainfall region.

Engineering is the practice of the art of science - Steve

RE: carbonate geology

Have you done a soils analysis? The water can only get into the sinkhole as fast as it can get through the soil, and it sounds as if your site has some particularly porous soil.

When you say "visible sinkholes" do you mean open throated sinkholes or depressions with no outlet?

I agree that the site is a bit on the small side for a regression model, but if you want to go that way, Kentucky Region 7 regression equations were developed for a Carst landscape.  The soils generally are type B & C, and by the sounds of it you're dealing with a type A soil, so the equations may not be applicable.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources