×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Thermal Conductance Value (Approriate Modeling?)

Thermal Conductance Value (Approriate Modeling?)

Thermal Conductance Value (Approriate Modeling?)

(OP)
Hi all,

    I am modeling two aluminum plates (.125 in thick, 1.048 in tall,2.25 in long) connected at a right angle to each other along the short side. There are three fasteners spaced evenly (NAS 662 Flat Head Screws (100°)). I take the thermal resistance to be L/kA with its inverse being the thermal conductance. For L I use the thickness of the plate (.125"). However, the units of this formulation are (m)/((W/m/K)(m^2)) giving W/K. ANSYS requires thermal conductance in W/m^2/K. So if I leave out the Area, the units are correct but then it seems that ANSYS is always using a Wet Interface (i.e. all the area around the bolts) but I want to represent a lesser area (a circle around each bolt whose diameter is 2*bolt diameter).  Any advice is appreciated.

RE: Thermal Conductance Value (Approriate Modeling?)

Wow!  You've managed to confuse the heck out of me.  Yes you're right that Ansys uses the "wet" area as you put it...or rather the area where it sees contact as the area where heat can transfer.  I'm really confused about how a lesser area would have twice the diameter like you explain in your second to last sentence but I do have a couple suggestions to offer:

a) Scale your thermal conductance values to give you the desired result at the respective interfaces (ie. you may have to define more than one real constant set to apply to your contact elements).  Or if you're using Ansys WB this is super easy.

b) Create custom contact or custom contact components so you have complete control over where conduction can and cannot occur.

-Brian

RE: Thermal Conductance Value (Approriate Modeling?)

(OP)
Thanks for your help . I'm not sure what the confusion is. In one case the thermal conductance is considers the entire interface area and in the other case it is not. I conservatively consider twice the bolt diameter as the effective area around each bolt where heat transfer occurs. I had thought about just scaling it and I wanted some one else's input.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources