×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

(OP)
Hi, we've got a device with an optical transmission line made as follows:
1) an infrared transmission device containing a led surrounded by either Dow Corning Sylgard or Araldite D and a 0.4mm thick PES disk as "external window"
2) a 0.5mm free air path
3) a receiver with the same architecture of the tx

We must do a thermical cycle to validate the product: 3h@-20°C, then 3h@+70°C, all this for 2 times.
What happens is this:
a) without thermical cycle our electronics has a gain X on the optical amplifier
b) with Sylgard we see that after the first -20°C the gain need to be lowered (i.e. the optical attenuation diminish), after +70°C the effect goes on the same direction but is less important and another -20 does almost nothing so we can say that the first cycle tends to improve and stabilize the path loss
c) with Araldite D the effect is more intense and after every step, both -20 and +70, ther is a substantial improvement without stabilization.

We made the cycle on some specimens without filler and saw no variations at all, so it must be the polymer that makes the difference.

Can anyone please suggest an interpretation of this?

RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

To me this looks like it may be due to post curing of the epoxy making it contract and put pressure on your window. Therefore I would suggest one of the following:

1. Cure the epoxy longer
2. Cure the epoxy at higher temperature
3. Use a catalyst to help the cure
4. Choose a more reactive epoxy

RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

(OP)
Hi Demon, I just talked to the guy who made the tests.
He says that in his last try he removed the PES windows on both tx and rx, so there are just the diodes embedded in the polymer and the air gap between.

RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

Hello,

Thanks for the info. I still think that it may well be the post curing of the epoxy stressing the diode and thereby changing the way light passes out.

RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

The reason I suspect that is that the epoxy is curing a bit more every time you cycle from -20°C to 70°C and so the effect lessens with each test cycle. Still just a guess though.

RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

The fact that you see the most significant change after a -20C cycle I think rules out any postcure effect. You will not get postcure at that temp. You will maximize the mechanical stresses due to thermal effects. I would surmize that the mechanical stress on silicon in the LED is changing its characteristic response to light.

RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

As I understood it the effect lessens with every temperature cvycle and that is what makes me suspect post cure during the 70°C part of the cycle. A straight mechanical effect cannot explain the observed variations.

RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

It may have nothing to do with the cure, per se.  You've got silicon potted in an acrylic potted in something else.  

What's the CTE match or mismatch?  Even if it were perfectly matched, you could still have problems, since the LED body may be sufficiently small enough to self-relieve the compression/expansion stress, relative to the diode portion.

TTFN



RE: IR transparency behaviour of epoxy and

Well let's divide this into two effects.

I agree that the variations may well be due to strain on the LED caused by the epoxy.

The fact that the magnitute of the magnitute of the variation lessens with each heating cycle may indicate that the epoxy is post curing.

One idea that could potentially help is to first coat the LED in a layer of curing silicone rubber. Then coat the silicone (after cure) with epoxy. The silicone (or other rubber) should act as a buffer when the epoxy contracts. So the epoxy will squeeze the silicone and not the LED! Another way to achieve the same effect is to add very small rubber particles to the epoxy or choose a lower moldulus epoxy.

Your idea of adding filler was a good one but it didn't work. I think that's because although adding filler reduces shrinkage on cure it also increases the modulus of the epoxy (relative to the unfilled) and thereby increases the force on the LED.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources