×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cast in Place Culvert
5

Cast in Place Culvert

Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
Some civil punk came up with this great idea to burry a culvert 60+ feet below finish grade and it was left up to me to design it.  No big deal, I got the loads from the geotech and designed it.  It looks more like a bomb shelter than a culvert, and would probably work as one too, unless it is the monsoon season.  This thing is stout and heavily reinforced, but I have not put any sort of expansion or control joints in it.  I really think it is fine, just let it crack.  Since this is my first culvert to design, I was just wondering if anyone else has designed one of these things and if control joints are typically used.  Thanks.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

An arch shape can probably save you 60% of the materials cost. I.E. 10" walls/ceiling vs. 24" top and 12" walls.  No control joints are required,(if ends are not restrained).  The vertical loads can be safely reduced by soil arching, (compared to a vertical prism of overburden).  Turn downs and scour protection at the ends will assure a usable life span.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
An alternate was proposed for the culvert by a precast arch manufacturer.  The example dimensions you gave are close to what I saw.  I hope they go that way, but for my case you don't think I need any control joints?  The precast system would naturally have some at each segment.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

If you read the DOT requirements on such things you'll find that some states construct culverts in 50' sections and others do not.  What I typically see in the midwest is that culverts less than 80' are constructed without joints and those that are greater have joints every 45 or 50'.

A continuous pour of 100' feet of concrete is rare, especially when it is 12 to 24" thick as may be the case for the base slab.  I know that bridge decks are routinely placed in one fell swoop but they are thinner.

So if you'll wind up with a cold joint, you might as well plan for it and make it a contraction or expansion joint.  

Regards,
Qshake
pipe
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

generally around here we pour in a checkerboard fashion to reduce or eliminate shrinkage cracks.  Expansion joints shouldn't be necessary since extreme temperature fluctuation is not to be anticipated below ground.  Contraction is eliminated by the checkerboard.  For high embankments, we would use waterstops at the joints.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

I'd probably put a CJ at midpoint and have a joint at the inlet and outlet structure.  I use the PVC 'flat' type of joint that is tacked to the inside of the form... They don't collapse.  What are the x-section dimensions of the culvert?  Did the geotekkie consider full height of the fill?  Can you put a layer or so of geotextile to promote arching action?

Dik

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
The inside dimesions are 8'x10' and it is about 1000 feet long.  The geotech gave me equvialent fluid pressures, so it was up to me to add the depth component.  

I agree with the no need for expansion joint, and I doubt it will be a continuous pour.  So my construction joint should allow contraction?  Or not not even worry about it?  I was just thinking of showing a shear key and continiuing the hor. reinforcement throuh the joint.  If I should allow for contraction, I would put smooth dowels in place of the hor. reinforcement.  So, contraction joint or no contraction joint?  Thanks.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

I vote no contraction joint, unless you are also willing to install waterstops

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
I thought about that too.  The last thing I wanted was to do was to allow water into my culvert!  I'm thinking no contraction joint too.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

2' slab for a 10' span seems a bit much... I would have thought 1/2 that thickness... Use proper corner bars and not just top dowels.  You should query your geotekkie and get a real design load envelope from him.  1000' long should have joints at 50'+/- o/c.  Maybe a typo?

Dik

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
It is 1000' long.  I know I am going to have construction joints at intervals like that, but my question is if I need to allow for any movement in them.

As for the thickness, I designed it based on the geotech's loads.  Without using shear reinforcement, it gets pretty thick.  I'm thinkink civil person must have done one of these.  He had a good guess for not much info.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

My experience is that the 2' is pretty good for the depth and span.  

However, I do not agree with the continuous pour, there is no way that will happen especially in the walls.  Usually the walls are around 12-18" thick and with all the steel can and height of the forms can require extra attentino to consolidation of the concrete.  The pour will move along slowly and there is time limits on the amoutn of time a truck can sit on site.  And the worst thing you want is a horizontal cold joint in a wall.

Do everyone a favor and place the joints on 50' centers and use a waterstop (good idea by the way).  The laborers and inspectors will thank you.  

Regards,
Qshake
pipe
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
Ok, ok! I know I will have construction joints at least every 50', if not more.  I know it won't be continuous.  

Your wall thickness estimate is right on.  I am glad some of you have come up with the same sizes I did.  Some of these guys around here thought I was killing it.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

Talk to Hydroconduit or somebody else that does pipe and check out a 108" pipe alternate.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

Contraction joints are, for the most part, nice looking cracks. This is done on exposed slabs/walls where you want to have a defined and uniform pattern of cracks and not a set random crack. They do not prevent cracking. I think the only control joints you need are construction. Will the top of the culvert be also in the ground?  

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

ConArch can construct the culvert in place using their patented rolling arch forms. No expansion or contraction joints are required. Close spacing of steel, (less than eight inches ), will keep cracking to a non-visible size.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

I would say to use corrosion-resistant or epoxy covered rebar.  Basic reinforced concrete box would be fine with that rebar as well though - joints only as required for construction.  Constructibility gains would more than offset the extra for the better rebar.  I'd still compare with pipe though.  It's near the crossover size where box becomes more cost effective.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
mitchelon - yes, the top of the culver will be well below grade, close to 60'.   Thanks for the tip, I am thinking along the same lines you are.

civilperson - a Con-something company may end up doing this as an alternate.  Out of curiosity, how can the walls be so much thinner?  Shear was controling the thickness, since I didn't use any shear reinforcement.  Is shear reinforcement used in these arches?   

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

The strength of the arch shape is similar to pipe in that the wall/soil interface is a major strength component.  Without suitable backfill, the loads would crush the pipe or the arch.  The arch has the advantage of compressive forces throughout the wall/ceiling. Shear strength of concrete in compression can be 32 times more than square root of f'c,(compared to 2 or 4 or whatever the long arithmetic formula gives).  Talk to ConArch in Arizona, top notch engineers on staff for really good design,(an education in reading their calculations).

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

If you don't put control joints every 40-50 ft, you'll get random cracks that will leak until dirt fills the cracks.  If you can live with a little leakage, then forget about it.  

If not, then make your construction joints into control joints.  Cut out half or all of your longitudinal reinforcing at the joint and put in a waterstop.  Also, your longitudinal reinforcing between joint should be a minimum of .005 of your concrete area, according to Table 7.12 of ACI 350, Code Requirements for Environmental Concrete Structures.  I'd use #7@10" for 24" walls.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

Con-Arch is worth checking out.  Here's the link

http://www.con-arch.com/

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

jmiec,

Why would water leak through random cracks and not through cracks at contraction joints?

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

(OP)
civilperson -  Reading parts of chap. 11 of ACI 318, it looks like at best 6sqrtf'chd.  Also,ACI 318 11.10.5 says only 2sqrtf'c hd for walls anyway.  I am going to have to look into how they can get such high values.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

Mitchelon-

A waterstop is located in the control joint.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

I think with proper design and placement of the reinforcing steel to minimize shrinkage cracking and with limits to the length of pour of say 50' - it should be possible to limit the cracking to a minimum, at least enough to prevent excessive entry of water through the cracks.  If concerned with differential settlement, control joints can be used as recommended and a properly designed waterstop will prevent water entry.  As recommended, a circular or arch shaped structure may be more economical.  120" pipe has nearly the same cross sectional area and would provide similar conveyance capacity, without the need for cast in place, control joints, waterstops etc. which might be a considerable savings if you can get this with the proper D-load.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

jmiec -

I like your reference to ACI 350.  I think it is more applicable to above ground structures or underground structures that carry contanminants though.  Either way, it clearly shows your looking at other resources.

Regards,
Qshake
pipe
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

waterstop heh, touche, touche.

RE: Cast in Place Culvert

Qshake-

I think of a culvert as an environmental structure.  In any case, ACI 350 is very concerned with preventing leaks through concrete, while ACI 318 is not.  I don't know of a better reference for this situation.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources