Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)
Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)
(OP)
I have a 34' X 120' pole building, where my client wants posts at 40' spacings. I designed non-constrained footings for lateral loads no problem.
However, what started as a 2' diam X 7' deep auger cast footing for lateral loads, has grown to a 3.5' diam. X 14' deep ftg. for vert. load. 3' diam. goes way too deep and 4' diam auger seems too large.
The huge increase came because of the weight of the footing. As I go deeper, the weight of concrete goes up as fast as the additional bearing capacity, theoretically. I am including skin friction {Fs=(K)(sigma prime v)(tan delta)}, which ended up about 12k of the total 42k capacity.
I have 25 psf snow, 8 psf dead load. Soil allow. cap. is 1500 psf, plus increase of 120 psf, per foot of depth, for soil overburden. My roof load is 22k. Footing wt. has reached 20k!
I am recommending going to smaller post spacings, but I am having a hard time convincing my client that we need this much footing. I know all this concrete won't sink to the middle of the earth, so my capacity increase for depth must not be linear like I am assuming. Any help? Sorry so long.
However, what started as a 2' diam X 7' deep auger cast footing for lateral loads, has grown to a 3.5' diam. X 14' deep ftg. for vert. load. 3' diam. goes way too deep and 4' diam auger seems too large.
The huge increase came because of the weight of the footing. As I go deeper, the weight of concrete goes up as fast as the additional bearing capacity, theoretically. I am including skin friction {Fs=(K)(sigma prime v)(tan delta)}, which ended up about 12k of the total 42k capacity.
I have 25 psf snow, 8 psf dead load. Soil allow. cap. is 1500 psf, plus increase of 120 psf, per foot of depth, for soil overburden. My roof load is 22k. Footing wt. has reached 20k!
I am recommending going to smaller post spacings, but I am having a hard time convincing my client that we need this much footing. I know all this concrete won't sink to the middle of the earth, so my capacity increase for depth must not be linear like I am assuming. Any help? Sorry so long.





RE: Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)
RE: Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)
RE: Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)
That is what I did in my 4th paragraph. Unless I get a geotech report, I am only aware that I can increase my allow. brg. pressure by the soil overburden I am removing. This is where I think I am being too conservative, but dont know what else I can do.
I could drill the ftg. I need for lateral, then add a spread footing at the top, just under the ground surface, like the head of a nail. Hmm.
CivilPerson,
Thanks, but I don't think my client would go to the expense of drilling a bell. It is supposed to be just a simple pole building, but his demand for 40' post spacing is making it not so simple.
RE: Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)
For your building:
Area on each pole: (34)(.5)(40) = 680 sf.
Dead Load: (8 psf)(680) = 5440 lbs.
Snow Load: (25 psf)(680) = 17000 lbs.
Total Load at top of pier: 22,440 lbs.
Net Weight of 3.5 ft x 14 ft pier = 9.62 sf x 14 ft x 45 pcf = 6,061 lbs.
Total load on pier = 22,400 + 6,061 = 28,501 lbs.
Skin friction = 12,000 lbs.
Net required bearing pressure = 28,501 - 12,000 = 16,501 lbs
For the 3.5 ft pier = end bearing pressure = 16,501 / 9.62 = 1715 psf. This doesn't look to high.
RE: Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)
Thank you very much for your thoughtful input. Yes, that is basically what I did. I just thought that a 3.5' diam x 14' pier was too big for a simple open pole building, where a little settlement would matter little anyway.
I since spoke in depth with a Geotech Engr who said it is industry standard to ignore the weight of a auger cast pier since the wt. of conc. is close enough to the wt. of soil removed. Then still taking the allow. brg. increase of 120 sf/ft of depth due to consolidation at that depth. He said the actual strength you get with depth increase is FAR more than this, so the design is still conservative. Assuming a Class 4 or 5 IBC soil.
This gave me a 3' diam. x 9' deep ftg, which seemed more reasonable.
RE: Auger Cast Ftg. for Cant. Wood Column (Pole Building)