×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Damping Ratio for Secondary System

Damping Ratio for Secondary System

Damping Ratio for Secondary System

(OP)
What is an appropriate damping ratio for use in a seismic analysis of a secondary system?  The device is a sheetmetal cabinet assembled sometimes by welding but mostly with threaded fasteners.

RE: Damping Ratio for Secondary System

The generic assumption in mechanical engineering is 5%.  Some "large structures" are as low as 1%.

So you run the analysis with both values.

Ultimately, damping cannot be predicted.  It can only be measured.

Tom Irvine
www.vibrationdata.com

RE: Damping Ratio for Secondary System

(OP)
Thanks for the reply.

Since my original post, I found NUREG/CR-6919, "Recommendations for Revision of Seismic Damping Values in Regulatory Guide 1.61", .  This paper gives recommendations for damping ratios for structures, piping, HVAC ducts, mechanical and electrical equipment, etc. This can be found at:

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/contract/cr6919/cr6919.pdf

RE: Damping Ratio for Secondary System

That looks like a good paper to back up the Regulatory Guide.  It is interesting that there appears to be no mention of how damping is affected by the stiffness of the secondary item - i.e. its fundamental period or by its level of ductility.  Haven't read it cover to cover, so may have missed it.  

It is my understanding that for rigid items, damping has no effect on its seismic response and it is only as the items fundamental period starts to get above 0.06 secs does damping start to kick in.  

Also, as an items response to an earthquake increases and things start to yield, the level of damping has a decreasing effect on its dynamic response.  Hence for structures with a strutural ductility factor of 2 or greater, it is normal to disregard the effects of damping and assume a response as per the 5% damping curves.  

So if your secondary item is meant to remain largely elastic and is not rigid, damping is a consideration in its response.  Whereas if it is rigid or is going to yield and deform substantially, damping will not be important.

RE: Damping Ratio for Secondary System

because you want this secondary system to behave elastically during big earthquake, I suggest you to take a 1% damping.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources